Ike Silver

Ike Silver

@ikesilver.bsky.social

Assistant Professor of Marketing at University of Southern California. I study spaces where morality, politics, and marketing collide.

483 followers173 following26 posts

Ike Silver reposted

Do women feel some emotions more strongly than men do? Out today in Affective Science, I argue that claims like this make a notoriously subtle mistake. What is it? And what does it have to do with an astigmatic painter and thyroid medicine? A short thread... (1/14)

link.springer.comThe El Greco Fallacy, this Time with Feeling: How (not) to Measure Group Differences in Emotional Intensity - Affective ScienceWe all get angry. And some of us get angrier than others. But are such differences systematic across groups? Affective scientists often make claims about group differences in emotional intensity by co...

Sam is one of the most thoughtful scholars of dishonesty around. His latest on the topic - disentangling cheating from lying - is required reading!👇

Sam Skowronek@skowroneksam.bsky.social

💢New paper alert💢 Dishonesty is everywhere — but it’s not all the same. My new solo-authored paper in Journal of Experimental Psychology: General disentangles cheating and lying as distinct forms of dishonesty. Link to paper: doi.org/10.1037/xge0... A thread 🧵👇

What makes people feel entitled to rewards? Check out Corey’s paper for a provocative new take…

Corey Cusimano@cusimano.bsky.social

What makes people feel entitled to rewards—the effort they put into their work or the outcomes they achieve? Out now in PNAS; with Jin Kim and Jared Wong: Achievement. Effort seems to matter very little (if at all). www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...

View full thread

Direction of comparison matters because scaling down condemnation (saying B is less bad than A) leaves ambiguity as to whether one is “downplaying.” Does scaling down mean I am not taking this seriously enough? This moral character threat is not present when scaling up (saying A is worse than B).

While people readily say that bad act A is worse and deserves more punishment than bad act B, they are reluctant to say that B is less bad and deserves less punishment than A. When asked which of two acts is less bad, many opt to say both are equally bad (even when one is quite transparently worse!)

Ike Silver reposted

1. For the past thirty years I've had the best job in the world. 
I've had the opportunity to follow my curiosity; explore the workings of nature and society; mentor students and junior colleagues in the same process; and teach generations of students about it all.

Ike Silver reposted

not paying indirect costs for research is like only paying the players in the Super Bowl. can't have a Super Bowl without coaches, referees, security, janitors, announcers, stadium staff, and a stadium - and you can't have research without supporting people and facilities

Ike Silver reposted

✨New preprint✨How does repeated exposure to transgressions online shape moral judgment? Results show two competing processes: 💠We get desensitized = ⬇️ wrong 💠Transgression seems more infamous =⬆️wrong Relative strength of each may predict outrage to viral transgressions w/ @danieleffron.bsky.social

Ike Silver reposted

I am worried that scientists will self-censor and not share their work because they view it as trivial relative to what is going on But let's not participate in the destruction of science. Please share your work unapologetically and share others' work Science matters; your science matters!

Ike Silver reposted

New work out in JEP:Gen with @erikakirgios.bsky.social and Edward Chang! How do historically marginalized job applicants respond to concrete, quantified diversity commitments in job ads? We conducted a large, preregistered field experiment to find out…

Erika Kirgios@erikakirgios.bsky.social

How do job seekers react when orgs quantify their diversity commitments? In a 🚨new paper🚨 with @ikesilver.bsky.social & Edward Chang, we explore competing predictions about how women and racial minorities react to measurable goals vs. vague, values-focused commitments.

Ike Silver reposted

Delighted to receive the Journal of Finance DFA First Prize for "Selling Fast and Buying Slow: Heuristics and Trading Performance of Institutional Investors" We show that behavioral econ findings not limited to the lab, they show up amongst the most sophisticated market participants.

papers.ssrn.comSelling Fast and Buying Slow: Heuristics and Trading Performance of Institutional InvestorsAre market experts prone to heuristics, and if so, do they transfer across closely related domains—buying and selling? We investigate this question using a uniq

Ike Silver reposted

been seeing lots of work lately on whether LLMs can give ethical counsel, but i am not so optimistic. it's pretty hard to know good advice when you get it! and sometimes the best moral advice transcends the prompt. www.scientificamerican.com/article/plea... #socialpsyc #PsychSciSky

scientificamerican.comChatGPT Gives Moral Advice. Here’s Why You Probably Shouldn’t Take ItBefore turning to a large language model for ethical counsel, consider what makes for good advice

Why condemn seemingly harmless cases of plagiarism? In my first ever paper, we argued that concerns about false reputation - agents claiming credit for traits they lack - were the culprit. Of course back then we didn't consider how accuser motives might impact this situation...

Jay Van Bavel, PhD@jayvanbavel.bsky.social

People strongly condemn plagiarizers who steal credit for ideas, even when the theft in question does not appear to harm anyone onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.... These negative reactions are driven by people's aversion toward agents who attempt to falsely improve their reputations

For creatures that usually struggle to remain principled and consistent across different situations ourselves, we sure do seem to expect/demand a great deal of moral consistency from others…

Ike Silver reposted

On further reflection, the selection of @simine.com as Editor-in-Chief of Psychological Science is one of the most important milestones for the reform movement in psychology. There will be impact on the journal, sure. But more, selecting a committed, visible reformer illustrates its normalization.

You are up to date.