J-Dave

J-Dave

@j-dave.bsky.social

CA lawyer. Almost social. Almost gifted. Almost retired. Still learning new tricks. Disobedient in advance and at most other times too.

446 followers91 following2K posts

J-Dave reposted

Today I learned one of the services I use for live video will become much more pricy for me. If you're been enjoying my clipping and/or PN but aren't supporting my work, now would be a great time to do so. The best way is by signing up for a paid sub, but I also accept tips on Venmo (@atrupar). Thx!

publicnotice.coSubscribe to Public NoticeSign up for independent, incisive coverage of US politics and media, right in your inbox five times a week. Click to read Public Notice, by Aaron Rupar, a Substack publication with hundreds of thousan...

I'll take "Nuremburg trial exhibits" for $200

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com

DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin: "You gotta dig in and go find the people that are deeply hiding. At some point the self-deportation numbers are going to start decreasing, and we are gonna have to go start rounding all these individuals up."

When you're afraid to publish Steve Vladeck, you're *really* on the wrong side

Steve Vladeck@stevevladeck.bsky.social

This morning, I recorded a video on TikTok about why DHS’s arguments for the power to enter homes without judicial warrants in immigration cases are bunk. Nine hours later, TikTok still says my video is “under review,” and can’t be shared. Well, here’s a link: georgetown.box.com/v/Vladeck-IC...

Now *there's* a template for opinions to follow: "The person claiming to be U.S. Attorney was not validly appointed and has been disqualified. Please refile this action, if appropriate, in the name of a validly appiinted U.S. Attorney. To validly appoint a U.S. Attorney ..."

A civil attorney who Trump enthusiast Lindsey Halligan brought in to prosecute the Letitia James case screwed up his initial appearance and the court had to give him step-by-step instructions about how to save a PDF.

Democrats still want to win by appealing to people who would make good trial jurors -- you know, set aside prejudices, consider evidence carefully, all that stuff. Republicans win by appealing to people who should never be on a jury. It's a terrible game, but Republicans are definitely good at it

Mike Masnick@masnick.com

"You can't policy your way out of a propaganda problem" is such a good line. Policy matters, but how you communicate stuff matters more right now.

A good trial juror will set prejudices aside, consider only the applicable law and admitted evidence, and decide the case impartially. Democrats try to win with people who would make good jurors. Republicans try to win with people who wouldn't. Republicans understand the game better than Dems do.

Vladeck subscriber confirms and attests to value of subscription

Steve Vladeck@stevevladeck.bsky.social

Pretty sure that this is the first time a “One First” post has been cited in a judicial opinion—here, in Judge Thacker’s concurrence in the Fourth Circuit’s denial of the government’s stay request in Abrego García: s3.documentcloud.org/documents/25...

So the criminal grifter moron who can't tell political asylum from an insane asylum gets elected inmate-in-chief. Only in what used to be America.

You are up to date.