Jeffrey Brainard

Jeffrey Brainard

@jeffreybrainard.bsky.social

Reporter, Science magazine. I write about scientific publishing, peer review, open science. jbrainard[[at]]aaas[[dot]]org. ... Signal: JBrainard.19 ... NewsScience[[at]]proton.me

509 followers108 following43 posts

As journals and conferences report a surge in papers containing AI writing, AI-text detectors struggle to flag human-written, AI-edited text. A new approach instead flags this writing based on the human-generated ideas it contains. #AIWriting #peerreview @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...

science.orgDid an AI or a human write that paper? New detector decides by examining its ideasAlgorithm looks for clues about a paper's origin that text-based detectors miss

Survey participants are often promised anonymity, but researchers studying crime posted a public data set that identified people who confessed to crimes. Without more care, #openscience can conflict with privacy #researchintegrity #academicpublishing @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...

science.orgSocial science studies may promise anonymity, but participant identities often lurk in public dataOne-fifth of data sets intended to support replication breached privacy standards, study finds

U.S. science agencies are forecast to pay more for #openaccess publication of journal articles. Are they ready? And is the author-pays business model sustainable? A GAO report draws criticism. #scholcomm @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...

science.orgU.S. agencies aren’t ready for the rising cost of making research papers free, report warnsScience agencies could soon face nearly $1 billion publishing bill, Congressional analysts find

The credibility of scientific journal articles might be bolstered if they carried a score capturing their rigor, such as whether the findings could be replicated. But constructing a telltale indicator of replicability remains a challenge. #openscience @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...

science.orgAcross the social sciences, half of research doesn’t replicateAmbitious effort tested whether more than 100 papers held up on multiple types of “repeatability” tests

Can researchers effectively use artificial intelligence to develop better understanding and insights into the rising number of scientific research papers if the content searched is siloed by publisher? #scicomm #scientificpublishing @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...

science.orgJournal giant Elsevier unveiled an AI tool that scans millions of paywalled papers. Is it worth it?First-of-its-kind product raises questions about costs, access, and equity

Many want to use AI to accelerate science, and utilizing it to explore the growing tsunami of research articles is getting lots of attention. Measuring the quality of AI answers to questions about science is a challenge. @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...

science.orgOpen-source AI program can answer science questions better than humansDeveloped by and for academics, OpenScholar aims to improve searches of the ballooning scientific literature

#SpecialIssues have fueled the growth of some of the largest #OpenAccess publishers. Does a journal that allows a #GuestEditor to both plan a special issue and write many articles in it have a conflict of interest? #scicomm #peerreview @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...

science.orgSome guest editors pack special issues with their own articlesThousands have penned more than one-third of a journal issue, raising conflict-of-interest concerns

#OpenScience costs money - think author fees/ APCs - but is assumed to provide benefits for academe, the public, and the economy. The PathOS study explored new ways to measure that. But proving a direct effect is tricky. #scientificpublishing #scicomm @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...

science.orgIs ‘open science’ delivering benefits? Major study finds proof is sparseIt’s hard to measure social and economic impacts of making papers and data free, researchers say

A rapidly growing share of letters to journals may be drafted by machines, undetected by editors. Study quantifies recently ‘prolific debutante authors’ who had published no letters before 2022, when ChatGPT debuted. #academicjournals #peerreview @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...

science.orgLetters to scientific journals surge as ‘prolific debutante’ authors likely use AINew study reinforces worries about “mass production of junk” by unscrupulous scholars aiming to pad their CVs

A human reviewer's take on an AI-written paper: 'Technically correct but neither interesting nor important.' Yesterday's first-of-its-kind #Agents4Science conference, where all papers were written and reviewed by #AI, considered their promise, limitations @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...

science.orgAt futuristic meeting, AIs took the lead in producing and reviewing all the studiesOrganizers aim to tune AI to help accelerate science

Can AI help identify high-volume, low-quality, “questionable” scientific journals (which some, controversially, call #predatoryjournals )? Authors of this new study emphasize aiding not replacing human evaluators of these journals. @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...

science.orgAI tool labels more than 1000 journals for ‘questionable,’ possibly shady practicesNew algorithm could help scientists avoid publishing in shady titles

Can authors afford APCs for #openaccess publishing if NIH caps its payments for them? Institutional read-and-publish deals offer an APC-free alternative, but NIH also wants to lower the indirect cost rate to 15%, which could squeeze money for such deals. @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...

science.orgNIH details options for limiting its payments for open-access publishing feesOther publishing proposals would scrap reimbursements or pay peer reviewers, unprecedented steps for a major government funder

Under a new NIH rule, the number of journal articles with #CreativeCommons licenses may soon grow. Many authors say they don't understand how CC licenses do - and don't - protect #intellectualproperty. A copyright lawyer explains. #openscience @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...

science.orgWhat scientists need to know about sharing—and protecting—their published workWith research papers becoming increasingly free to read and use, understanding open-access licenses is key

Many #researchintegrity sleuths are volunteers with little financial support for their often-daunting work to uncover #scientificfraud. One of the most prominent, Elisabeth Bik, has now provided money to change that. @elisabethbik.bsky.social @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...

science.orgRenowned scientific integrity investigator endows fund to support fellow sleuthsMicrobiologist Elisabeth Bik donates $200,000 to support training, travel

I’m glad to join the community here discussing science and #ScientificPublishing, which I write about for Science magazine. I welcome suggestions. #peerreview #ResearchPublication #ResearchPublishing #PublicationEthics #Authorship #ScientificCommunication #SciComm #scholcomm #AcademicSky

You are up to date.