Joe Devanny

Joe Devanny

@joedevanny.bsky.social

Senior Lecturer | National Security & Cyber | Department of War Studies | King’s College London | All views mine, etc.

3.5K followers985 following109 posts

Joe Devanny reposted

Delighted to talk to @poltheoryother.bsky.social on the concept history of the Global South.

Politics Theory Other@poltheoryother.bsky.social

📢💥NEW EPISODE 📢💥 - @rkadelhi.bsky.social on the history of the concept of the Global South. We talked about its emergence in the 1960s and its reemergence in the context of fracturing US hegemony, and how Global South displaced terms like 'emerging markets' and 'the developing world':

On Lula’s win: an outstanding achievement of popular mobilisation, but this will be his toughest term yet. And the project of generational transition in leadership of Brazil’s left is extremely urgent.

Keir Starmer’s allies have argued that foreign policy is a reason for him to stay. But he cannot now provide the stable leadership that effective foreign policy, like anything else, requires. With thanks to Emma Burnell for publishing at Labour List. labourlist.org/2026/05/fore...

labourlist.org'Foreign policy is not a reason to keep Keir Starmer in No.10' - LabourListHowever it is done, searching for a new leader is the smarter foreign policy move than labouring under the dead weight of Starmer’s endgame.

This commentary rightly highlights the fluidity of national identities: they are contested, reshaped over time. The debate about defining Britishness as a national identity is also complex as the UK is a pluri-national state, & with many overlapping factors shaping personal identity experiences.

The New Statesman@newstatesman1913.bsky.social

Jeevun Sandher MP: Matt Goodwin isn't very British Britain’s finest hour was a fundamental rejection of petty ethnonationalism. Reform should remember that

Prescriptive, and politically instrumental, debates about British values will struggle to capture this intrinsic plurality of experiences that Britishness encompasses.

Collective defence agreements with Global South states are clearly a non-starter - if indeed that is what Polanski was trying to articulate (not entirely clear) - but all the effort to enhance European defence can be done without leaving NATO.

This is an interesting essay. I think two things missing are (1) assessment of international security risks posed by China and (2) the continuing importance of hard power, notwithstanding the value of pursuing broad multilateral and normative diplomacy.

The New Statesman@newstatesman1913.bsky.social

China is Britain's future, writes James Schneider. Keir Starmer’s trip should be the dawn of a new era.

Corbyn: “An independent foreign policy is one that understands all of the challenges we face: global inequality, displacement and environmental disaster.” Are they really *all* the UK’s challenges? And there’s an implicit assumption, I think, that greater moral clarity is enough to achieve outcomes.

This is a persuasive case. I also think liberal democracies need to adopt a pro-active, aggressive threat-hunting approach to identifying and extirpating influence/information operations by hostile state actors. You could call it a campaigning, persistent engagement approach.

John Denham@jydenham.bsky.social

Strategic autonomy is a patriotic and democratic opportunity to realign liberal democratic and progressive politics with Europe’s people. buff.ly/Aiz4uBp

If done well, and properly resourced, this could improve UK counter-cybercrime efforts.

Alexander Martin@alexmartin.bsky.social

The UK government on Monday unveiled plans for a far-reaching overhaul of policing that would centralize the fight against cybercrime, fraud and other internet-enabled offenses, arguing the current system is no longer equipped for crimes that are increasingly digital and cross geographic borders.

There’s a good case for a bicameral system leading to more considered legislation. If the elected first chamber employs a legitimacy argument against the unelected second, there’s an obvious solution that a government with a commanding majority could decide to pursue. What might it be?

Jim McMahon MP@jimmcmahon.co.uk

I don’t support the Assisted Dying Bill and voted against it, but it is not right for the unelected chamber to block the commons.

I think much of what this oped advocates could be achieved without leaving NATO, and that leaving NATO would make the UK’s current situation worse. But its arguments about the need for the UK to reduce reliance on the US are fair.

Worth separating the fact that it could well be smart politics domestically for Polanski to secure this NS oped today, harnessing anti-Trump sentiment as Starmer tries to walk a tight rope, & that some of his arguments (unilateral abolition of nuclear deterrent), are much less smart for UK strategy.

The UK clearly needs to invest in greater independence of capabilities, and intensify cooperation with the NATO MSs that believe in the principles of the NAT, but similarly there’s a strong argument for leaving the diplomatic space to salvage the US relationship post-Trump. Calibration is key.

Definitely worth reading this alongside listening to @thegrugq.bsky.social & Tom Uren’s recent discussion of the same topic - role of cyber capabilities in the Venezuela raid. Top line: cyber operations contributed, that wasn’t surprising, & shouldn’t be the main takeaway from the raid.

RUSI@rusi.bsky.social

'Most governments do not disclose offensive cyber operations. Boasting about capabilities is not the usual game' writes @lmhurel.bsky.social in the latest RUSI Commentary.

The Trump cyber boast is obviously classic him, but we now know a lot more about how governments think about this than, say, a decade ago, both from deliberate public statements, and then from the larger body of unattributable leaks to media, which obviously require careful interpretation.

I think, if you are under fire for lots of U-turns, you should reflect before you repeatedly use the phrase “we are turning the country around.” And around. And around.

This is persuasive, both re: the U-turns and also in the other recent stories about different policy/strategy views emerging in the leadership challenge conversations, and new initiatives to foster intellectual debates across the party. They all highlight the shortcomings of the current centre.

George Eaton@georgeeaton.bsky.social

The problem with Labour’s U-turns: rather than showing flexibility they have too often reflected incoherence. www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk-...

This is a good report about Iranian government efforts to control internet access, including the most recent and most severe cut off during the current protests.

Financial Times@financialtimes.com

The regime has attempted to cut off internet access to the outside world but pictures and videos are still emerging, with activists trying to get information out of Iran and help galvanise the protests. ft.trib.al/v1xIsij

This is an interesting analysis of how treaty commitments would shape NATO member states’ responses to a US attack on Denmark. I wonder about the likelihood of a different scenario - not an attack but a declared fait accompli - and what the response of Denmark’s allies would be in practice.

Mike Schmitt@mikeschmitt.bsky.social

My thoughts on whether NATO Allies would be obligated to come to Denmark's assistance if (I can't believe I am saying this) the United States were to attack. Answer: Yes.

This is a good report on the latest details about the emerging UK government cyber security refresh, with good expert comments too. The language is positive, but I think Jamie sounds the right note of scepticism in his quoted remarks.

Alexander Martin@alexmartin.bsky.social

In an unusually candid admission, the British government acknowledged that its years-long approach to its own cybersecurity was flawed and warned it will be impossible to meet a previous target of securing all government organizations from known cyber vulnerabilities and attack methods by 2030.

Link here to a commentary I wrote recently on this topic, which I think provides some useful context for how the UK cyber strategy has evolved and why a more implementation-focused approach is a good idea in principle. bsky.app/profile/joed...

Joe Devanny@joedevanny.bsky.social

Nothing says Christmas week like sitting down to read about the ghosts of cybersecurity strategies past, present, and yet to come. With thanks to @lawfaremedia.org for publishing.

Nothing says Christmas week like sitting down to read about the ghosts of cybersecurity strategies past, present, and yet to come. With thanks to @lawfaremedia.org for publishing.

Lawfare@lawfaremedia.org

The U.K. is expected to announce its new cybersecurity strategy before the end of the year. @joedevanny.bsky.social takes stock of previous efforts to improve cybersecurity and assesses the largest cyber challenges facing the U.K. government. lawfaremedia.org/article/the-u.k.-s-cybersecurity-refresh

Two more examples: shielded Jonathan Powell from all but one begrudging private JCNSS meeting (no good reason not to appear, it’s just because he can); & recent ISC report indicates its budget/staff/remit could/should be better. Quick wins for a government serious about doing scrutiny better.

A very nostalgic read for people of a certain age, symbolising how the internet changed media consumption incredibly quickly.

Joseph Menn@joemenn.bsky.social

I got to do something great a week ago: join a 25-year reunion for people who worked at #Napster. While the original experience was rough for most of them, this was a chance to process it with old friends. It remains one of the most remarkable stories of that era. wapo.st/3HdcJhv

Joe Devanny reposted

Is Putin preparing to challenge Europe within three years? Dr @joedevanny.bsky.social highlights the deterrent effect of NATO, stating: "There is a difference between Putin being “ready” to use military force against Nato and his actually deciding to do it". Read more: bit.ly/3ZXE9Os

bit.lyPutin could attack Europe within three years, warns senior Nato officialRussia may look to launch an assault on a European country far sooner than expected, one of Britain's most experienced military figures has warned

Joe Devanny reposted

Joe Devanny reposted

Dr @joedevanny.bsky.social explores the complex challenges facing the Omagh Bombing Inquiry: “There is huge expectation on the Inquiry, but it faces the very difficult task of making contextually complex, historical judgements." @instituteforgov.bsky.social Learn more: bit.ly/4lG3h5M

bit.lyThe Omagh Bombing Inquiry faces very difficult historical challenges | Institute for GovernmentThe Omagh Inquiry must make judgments about events of a quarter century ago.
Institute for Government@instituteforgovernment.org.uk

There is huge expectation on the Omagh Bombing Inquiry but it faces a very difficult task of contextually complex, historical judgement. Read our latest guest comment from @joedevanny.bsky.social www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/comment/omag...

Joe Devanny reposted

Joe Devanny reposted

So it turns out a delegate from the U.S. National Security Council managed to fluster quite a few European counterparts by suggesting the U.S. might take lethal action against irresponsible spyware companies during the Pall Mall Process conference in Paris last week...

therecord.mediaAs spyware market continues to expand, diplomatic Pall Mall Process hits a pivot pointThe Pall Mall Process — a diplomatic initiative designed to reform the commercial spyware and hacking market — has added more nations as it confronts an industry that is more complex than ever.

Joe Devanny reposted

📺South Africa, like other middle ground nations, must navigate the differences in how democratic and authoritarian countries want to regulate the internet. What are its global cybersecurity policies, and what's unique about its cyber statecraft? Full video on our website: bit.ly/4iYzweH