John Holbein
John Holbein
@johnholbein1.bsky.social
Associate Professor of Public Policy, Politics, and Education @UVA. I share social science.
16.1K followers4.3K following2K posts
Which LDS apostles speak more like conservatives? Which LDS apostles speak more like liberals? Answer three questions, play the game, see the results here: johnholbein.github.io/apostle-scale/
This weekend is LDS General Conference. So I made a little game: Can you guess the LDS apostles’ political ideology from their speeches? 3 brief ?s → make your guesses → see the results Don’t know the current LDS apostles? No biggie; skip straight to results johnholbein.github.io/apostle-scale/
This weekend is LDS General Conference. So I made a little game: Can you guess the LDS apostles’ political ideology from their speeches? 3 brief ?s → make your guesses → see the results Don’t know the current LDS apostles? No biggie; skip straight to results johnholbein.github.io/apostle-scale/
If you are interested, here are the classroom materials you would need to replicate what I did. Link to the budget simulation: johnholbein.org/teaching-act... Accompanying slides (human generated with AI feedback): github.com/johnholbein/... Replication materials: github.com/johnholbein/...
Where does Jesus appear in scripture? Data: every verse in 22 canons. 36 Bibles. 11 Qur'ans. LDS standard works. etc. I coded 1.22M verses for Jesus mentions by name, by title, or through speech. I ran it multiple ways to try to (imperfectly) account for disputes. johnholbein.org/christ-menti...
"Artificial Deadlines (Part 2): Retrograding Ariely & Wertenbroch (2002)" datacolada.org/139
Academics are biased against null effects. As it turns out, so is the broader public.
🧐 What do citizens think about "null results" in scientific research? To find out, @johnholbein1.bsky.social & I fielded a large-scale online experiment. We gave respondents straightforward info about a study, asked them some Qs, showed them the results, then asked them Qs again.
“Artificial Deadlines (Part 1): Evidence of Fraud in an Influential Study About Procrastination” datacolada.org/138