Joss Sheldon

Joss Sheldon

@josssheldon.bsky.social

Radical author, a bit of an anarchist - preaching the stuff the mainstream dare not touch. Woke as an insomniac after ten cups of coffee. πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈπŸ‰πŸŒ Get my books here: https://bookshop.org/shop/JossSheldon

5.4K followers4.3K following2.5K posts

Zionists hate to acknowledge that Zionism is racism, in the same way that Manchester City fans hate to acknowledge that their club has been cheating - because it's much more comforting to live in denial, to believe you're a victim, than it is to accept an uncomfortable truth.

The Green Party: "(We support) the establishment of a single democratic Palestinian State in all of historic Palestine with Jerusalem as its capital, equal rights for all, and the right of return for Palestinians and their descendants." Racists: "That's racist".

It's not racist to say "Nazism is racist". It's not racist to say "Colonialism is racist". And it's not racist to say "Zionism is racist". First you define racism. Then you fight it. This is basic stuff. If you have a problem with that, you're probably a racist yourself.

The two-state "solution" has always been a racist idea. It'd preserve apartheid Israel as a Jewish ethnostate, and create a new state where Jews might not be welcome. Anti-racists must support a single secular state, which embraces everyone, regardless of ethnicity or religion.

During the Indian Rebellion, locals slaughtered around 6000 Brits (including civilians). Haitian slaves killed ALL the French colonialists on their island Zionists knew that similar events, like October 7th, would take place in Palestine They have Jewish blood on their hands

The Green Party, which is led by a Jew (Zack Polanski), accepted a motion which was co-proposed by a Jewish holocaust survivor (Stephen Kapos). Now a party which purged anti-racist Jews en masse (Labour) is calling THEM antisemitic. Make it make sense!

Look, apartheid has always been racist. You can't have a system which favours one ethnicity over another, and say "that's not racist". It doesn't wash. So Israel, which practices apartheid, is a racist state. And Zionism, which underpins that state, is a racist ideology.

Look, it's okay to say "Nazism is racism", because it is. That doesn't mean you hate regular Germans. Same with "Apartheid is racism" and South Africans, "Segregation is racism" and Americans, and "Zionism is racism" and Jews. Anyone who says otherwise is being disengenuous.

No anti-Zionist has ever called me a "kapo". No anti-Zionist has ever called me a "self-hating Jew". No anti-Zionist has ever called me an "as-a-Jew". Zionists do this all the time. Indeed, the only antisemitism I've ever experienced has come from Zionists.

Any political ideology which requires ethnic-cleansing (to establish) and apartheid (to maintain) is inherently racist. You cannot subdue members of another ethnicity without being racist. It's impossible. This shouldn't be "controversial".

Macklemore's speech paid tribute to Jewish Voice For Peace! The only way you can take his speech, and deem it "antisemitic", is if you associate criticism of Israel with criticism of Jews. That itself is antisemitic! Anyone who does that is an antisemite.

Jesus was a refugee, who fled to Egypt to escape King Herod. He praised the Good Samaritan - someone who helped an outsider. He said "whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me." You can't be a Christian and anti-migrant.

I don't oppose Zionism (Jewish nationalism), because of its supposed "Jewish" nature. I opposed it because of its supremicism and nationalism. I support Jewish internationalism - for the rights of Jews to live at peace, as EQUALS - achieving self-determination ANYWHERE ON EARTH.

If an activist group were to bomb a wedding in our country, they'd be condemned & branded as "terrorists". But when the American army bombs a wedding in a foreign country, we call their soldiers "heroes", we allow them to build bases on our land, & we shmooze their president...

Let me get this straight... There are 41 ecclesiastical courts in the UK. There are a bunch of Jewish courts (the Beth Din). There's a Sikh court. But it's only the Sharia councils which have caused an uproar? I wonder why that could be...

And no... There are no Sharia "courts" in the UK. They don't have any legal authority. They only deal in religious matters, such as religious divorces. They're not a threat to anyone. If you're spouting on about these, it's because you're a hated-fueled bigot.

Good riddance to Keir Starmer. He won't be missed... + Purged Jews from the party en masse. + Supported a genocide. + Failed to deliver any of his "Ten Pledges" + Waged war on juries and political protest + Stole the winter fuel allowance + Cost Labour the 2019 election.

The Notting Hill Carnival is an iconic feature of multicultural Britain - the legacy of immigrants who contributed to British culture - people who helped to improve and evolve our nation. If you hate that, then I'm afraid to say you hate Britain. Please feel free to leave.

In Britain we have a simple custom: If you stand for election, you make an appearance at the count, and stand in a line on stage when the results are announced. Farage didn't do this. He disrespected our way of life. He clearly hates Britain.

To all those people who wish to "close the borders" because immigration is "affecting British culture"... Why don't you wish to ban motor vehicles, which have destroyed the British culture of horse-based transportation? Why the double standard?

Right now, it's hard to understand the slave trade. It feels so vile. (But then we remember it was profitable too). In the future, I reckon people will feel exactly the same way about the arms trade: It's vile, it's murderous, but it makes a lot of money...

Under the current system of law, any organisation - a community group, a school, a religion - can be classed as a "terrorist group" on a whim. You can then be arrested and thrown behind bars for supporting it. That's nuts.

If you're fine with people receiving hundreds-of-thousands of pounds in unearned handouts via inheritance, then don't you dare ever whinge about people on benefits getting Β£100 here and Β£200 there.

Let me get this straight... The first time Burnham tried to become Labour leader the membership rejected him. The second time Burnham tried to become Labour leader the membership rejected him again. Now he's being pushed on us without a vote? Smells dodgy to me...

Struggling to differentiate between antisemitism and anti-Zionism? Then ask yourself a simple question: Would an anti-Zionist Jew have an issue with the act/speech? If the answer is "yes", it's probably antisemitic. If the answer is "no", it's probably anti-Zionist.

If you "support a two-state solution", then put your money where your mouth is and give away half of your country's land to Zionist settlers. Don't expect the Palestinians to give away half of their land.

Burnham's record so far... + Promised rent controls, then backtracked. + Promised to work with Trump to bomb Iran. + Expanded oil drilling in the North Sea. + Spoke about Gaza without using the word "genocide". Meet the new boss, same as the old boss...

All people should be granted the right to self-determination in all places (so long as they don't impinge on other people's right to self-determination). If you support a state which only gives self-determination to the members of one group, then you are a fascist. Shame on you.

I love the idea that rent controls might make landlordship unprofitable... + Landlords would be forced to sell their properties. + Property prices would plummet. + Former renters would be able to afford to buy their own homes. + Landlords would be forced to find productive work.

If you're opposed to "all violence" or "all forms of political violence", then you need to oppose armies, soldiers, police forces, police, border controls, prisons and prison staff - all of whom are violent.

Does anyone else get Nigel Farage vibes from Andy Burnham? He's charming, a great communicator, with a knack for taking people in. He supports a brand of mainstream, neoliberal, war-loving politics. He sticks around, despite being rejected by people time and time again...

Monocultures lack genetic diversity, which leaves them vulnerable to disease. The lack of biodiversity cannot sustain diverse ecosystems. Monocultures can only survive with poisons, such as pesticides and herbicides. This has been a post in favour of multiculturalism.

Labour Party members have rejected Andy Burnham, not just once but twice. If he's anointed now, without a vote, it'd be an insult to the party's members and to the English people as a whole.

If you thought things would improve when Johnson was replaced by Truss. Or when Truss was replaced by Sunak. Or when Sunak was replaced by Starmer. And you still believe that things will improve when Starmer is replaced... ...Well, then you're really not learning the lesson!

We don't need to change Prime Ministers every two years. We need to change the system once and for all. Neoliberalism has failed. We need an economy which serves the 99.99%, not the 0.01%.

My prediction... 1) Burnham becomes Prime Minister. 2) The country sees him for who he is. 3) Public opinion turns against him - his approval ratings plummet. 4) He's either replaced as Labour leader, or Labour lose 100+ seats at the next General Election.

Starmerite logic... The IDF: The militia behind a 78 year occupation, and an ongoing genocide: NOT a terrorist organisation. Palestine Action: A group that protests against genocide, which has never killed anyone: IS a terrorist organisation. #StarmerOut

> Fred West killed 12-20 people. No riots. > Harold Shipman killed 215-250 people. No riots. > 522 murders took place in England and Wales, in the year ending March 2025. No riots. > An immigrant kills 1 person. Violent riots. It's two-tier rioting, isn't it?

Here's a suggestion: We make the IDF a proscribed terrorist organisation. Anyone who joins in with their genocide gets arrested as soon as they return to Britain. Job done.