Rick

@peters.senate.gov @slotkin.senate.gov Congress holds the purse. Please consider this model rider: no funds, including 31 U.S.C. §1304, for the private presidential settlement fund unless Congress specifically appropriates by docket, purpose, and maximum amount. docs.google.com/document/d/1...

Discharge petitions shouldn’t be extraordinary. Citizens, states, counties, and local governments should be able to trigger a vote too. DOI: doi.org/10.5281/zeno... Doc: docs.google.com/document/d/1... Share it with your Congressmember.

If you're a scholar, researcher, or discoverer, do your best to stay away from Social Sciences Research Network (@ssrn.bsky.social). Opaque and arbitrary policies dominate their decision-making and they ALWAYS drag their feet getting your research uploaded anyway. Stay away. Zenodo is my choice.

My fellow humans, meet ¯\(ツ)/¯ <--- Chance ¯\(ツ)/¯ is the bedrock structure needed for the universe as we see it today. Yep...I'm claiming that. You can see the document when it gets accepted at @ssrn.bsky.social or below in my draft copy: docs.google.com/document/d/1...

Spoiler: the nervous system is input, not authority. That’s the entire professional canon. Full artifact + model school board template: pending acceptance at @ssrn.bsky.social, available here on GDocs. docs.google.com/document/d/1...

A crib sheet for anyone in the law profession; it uses Structural Flow as the lens to translate classic doctrine. Dispatches from the Record: Clerk Notes No. 9 — Entropy Across Doctrine It's awaiting acceptance on @ssrn.bsky.social or you can access it here. docs.google.com/document/d/1...

When corroborated harm persists, the Senate’s duty is oversight. That means hearings, records, conditions — and appropriations control if needed. Authorization pauses until constitutional limits are restored. @slotkin.senate.gov @peters.senate.gov. Before a Michigander is harmed.

Applying Structural Flow to Chemistry...look what fell out? Uploaded and awaiting acceptance on @ssrn.bsky.social or available below. docs.google.com/document/d/1... docs.google.com/document/d/1...

As promised, here is a more "proper research paper". I believe it introduces several possible paradigm shifts into Chemistry, but that's up to the specialists to parse. It's now uploaded and awaiting acceptance at @ssrn.bsky.social or available on GDocs below. docs.google.com/document/d/1...

Got a big and much needed belly laugh from this one. Thx prof! No one's going to hell anyway, so we should all just chill about it. Well said, my favorite Pink Prof!

@ssrn.bsky.social The people have spoken. My "learn along with me" series isn't popping. No problem, means less work for the good people at SSRN because I will collapse the rest of my series into classic research papers. Last "note" below. Full papers to follow. docs.google.com/document/d/1...

Can confirm. It's pretty terrible. So glad I had a spine and learned to reject early, but not everyone has that...and it shouldn't be an issue to begin with.

Enforcement without legal predicates isn’t enforcement — it’s unlawful force. The Constitution requires reasonable suspicion, warrants, and accountability. This lawsuit asks the courts to restore those limits.

100% agree. Treating people how they want to be treated (the platinum rule) is far superior to the golden rule anyway. So this approach is consistent. Well said.

@ssrn.bsky.social accepted ~10 uploads last night. Only a few hours in, the best performer is "The Quiet Classroom". Wonder why that is...lol. I think I will finish the law and Physio series before tackling Physics, Chem, and Philosphy. Thank you for the surprise. The work isn't done yet. Xoxoxo

When executive action persists without lawful authorization, the Constitution supplies remedies across Articles I, II, and III — oversight, appropriations control, judicial review, and formal accountability — until legality is restored.

Newest upload awaiting acceptance on @ssrn.bsky.social (as promised, slowing down...). A love letter to high-level clerks, their profession, and the work itself. Available here and soon on SSRN. docs.google.com/document/d/1... As you can see...it begins with a little spice...

A koan for originalism: if history yields no single, stable answer, what exactly is being “fixed”? Law still must decide under uncertainty. The problem isn’t history — it’s pretending selective fragments can substitute for institutional judgment.

The Fed’s independence is protected structurally, not rhetorically. Senators do it by guarding confirmation standards, resisting political pressure on rates, and enforcing evidence-based oversight. That boundary—not interference—is what stabilizes prices and expectations.

OR, you're a gawd and can do what you want...it's really more of a weak suggestion, if we're honest. The best this book has to offer is the golden rule. The platinum rule is an upgrade. Stop acting like we don't know better. It's foolish and a waste of what little time we have on earth. Thx prof!

Yep. Sorry I'm not sorry. We know better now. Stop acting like we don't...or...you know...take an unnecessary risk and live (or not) with the consequences. Thx Prof.

If a voter lawfully submits a ballot on time, the vote is complete. Due process does not allow the State to retroactively assign voters the risk of mail delays beyond their control. Infrastructure failure is a state problem—not a voter defect. Full stop.

A real ban on congressional stock trading — covering members, spouses, staff, and independent oversight — already exists as a draft statute: docs.google.com/document/d/1... @slotkin.senate.gov @peters.senate.gov

I hope my senator, Senator @sarahanthony.bsky.social agrees. It also feels like something Senator @stephanielilychang.bsky.social would be interested in as well. Say the word, and I'll spin up a template or rough draft of the legislation. Otherwise, I support the shape of this idea. Two thumbs up.

There’s already a clean legal framework for this. A draft amicus brief addressing secret, pretextual federal efforts to restrict FDA-approved medication — grounded in the APA, FDCA, and due process — is available here: docs.google.com/document/d/1...

Love it. Flex the power that the Constitution has appropriated to the Senate. Hope my senators @slotkin.senate.gov @peters.senate.gov agree. My congressman is an incoherent professional, so I won't bother with him. Let your senators know this is a legitimate expression and use of their power.

Unprofessional, no matter how you slice it. Even if you're a believer, this is horse shit. Ty for sharing. Of course, I'm not surprised. Christian nationalists are disgusting people and it shows in their professional conduct. Imagine what they do when no one is looking? Disgusting.

Next series. I will let @ssrn.bsky.social catch up and slow down production. Law series up and running Biology series (through the lens of the human nervous system in classrooms) here. Econ, Chem, and Physics to come. All aimed at paradigm shifts. docs.google.com/document/d/1...

What a stand-up leader our president is.

Word.

Bwahahahahaaahahaaaahahaha.

Agreed. Now impeach Noem.

Empirically true from what I understand. Hey Prof, maybe you could discuss the research in depth on a video sometime? Maybe call it a special or something. Just a thought. Ty for the post, as always.

This is about whether the State may exclude a class of people from public life without evidence of harm. Courts exist to resolve that question using facts and constitutional limits — not political signaling.

Love it. The Executive is not a king. We do care about these business dealings. Ty for doing something about it.

Congressional oversight includes the right of access — and the authority to condition funding on compliance. Facilities that receive public funds are not exempt from constitutional accountability.

When the State treats identity as threat, it mistakes the person for the problem — and the law stops doing its job.

@neildegrassetyson.com chapter 3, I believe, and you mentioned questions to ask. It turns out, if a human accepts their nervous system as input, 3 questions emerge: what's my next first step; what do I get for free; where is the boundary and how do I allow for duality. Ty for the book so far!

Discharge petitions are procedural release valves, not power grabs. They compel consideration without dictating outcomes—unlocking hidden majorities while preserving debate, amendment, and rejection. Oversight and accountability begin with a vote. docs.google.com/document/d/1...

Word.

Needed a laugh today. The Pink Prof is almost always provides. WAY better than any deity I ever believed in or anyone else believes in, and he's a tribble. Weird how that shit works out.

Word.

Incoherence leaks, y'all. Terrible professional? That's because you're looking at an incoherent human. Incoherent humans aren't going to receive my vote (and therefore, I don't want to pay them).

Hand raised...must make me nobody. Which jives...

@ssrn.bsky.social your support page is still broken. Email sent regarding 2 artifacts sitting for near a month. 8 more (as I have already tagged you here show) have been uploaded over the weekend but I understand if those will take the "two weeks" to clear. Please fix your support page.

A reminder of constitutional design: the Senate’s power is not force, but permission. Through appropriations and conditions, it may pause authorization flow until oversight duties are satisfied. That restraint isn’t obstruction — it’s part of the gig. @slotkin.senate.gov @peters.senate.gov

I don't need to. I'm calling in public and again for my Senators to impeach this disgusting excuse for a professional in our government. And now again. Impeach her. My tax dollars are paying her to endorse murdering citizens and mistreat humans in general. @peters.senate.gov @slotkin.senate.gov