Laurits Skov

Laurits Skov

@lauritsskov.bsky.social

I study Neanderthals, Denisovans and the effect of their DNA surviving in present day humans. Assistant professor at section for molecular ecology and evolution at Globe Institute Copenhagen, Denmark.

461 followers315 following33 posts

Very impressed by how quickly this came together - Hats off to @ipatramanis.bsky.social :) Once again showing how complicated our evolutionary history can be and how challenging it can be to assign individuals to ancient groups.

(Y|G)iannis P.@ipatramanis.bsky.social

We have a new preprint out :D www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6... Did Denisovans inherit their AMBN gene from Homo erectus? We have released a short preprint trying to answer this question! @lauritsskov.bsky.social @fridowelker.bsky.social ~Summary below~

Such a helpful resource! Now you can finally see which talks are happening at the same time so you can plan your conference :) #SMBE2026 Nice job @moicoll.bsky.social

Laurits Skov reposted

Announcing SimHumanity, a baseline SLiM 5.0 model of the full human genome, replete with demographic history, autosomes, X/Y, and mtDNA. A shared starting point for reproducible evolutionary simulations. We’d love your feedback! #SLiM #evolution #genomics www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...

biorxiv.orgSimHumanity: Using SLiM 5.0 to run whole-genome simulations of human evolutionThe reconstruction of human evolutionary history has undergone repeated advances, each made possible by methodological innovations. In recent decades, genetic and genomic data played a central role in...

We recommend picking the alpha closest to the 45 degree line (ideally you want to be as close to the top right corner as possible). We call these plots Artemis plots because of the bow like shape!

In practice this hybrid decoding has the highest accuracy when it comes to intermediate sized fragments. For short fragment posterior decoding is best and for long fragments viterbi is best.

The best alpha will depend on the specific emission and transition parameters. Also an alpha of 0.5 does not nescessaraly mark the halfway point between the two methods. There we propose a simulation approach for picking the appropriate alpha for your analyse.

If you simulate data from your emission and transition parameters you can calculate point wise accuracy/joint posterior probability and sensitivity/specificity plots for each alpha and pick the best one!

If only there was a way to have your cake and eat it too! Inspired by previous work we propose a weighted mean of posterior and viterbi decoding controlled by a parameter alpha. When alpha = 0 you get posterior decoding and when alpha = 1 you get viterbi. When alpha is intermediate you get a mix.

Viterbi decoding maximixes the global probability of the hidden state path. While leading to high accuracy this decoding tends to not switch states as often as it should and many short segments will be lost.

View full thread
View full thread

This sampling approach is easy to implement and can be used for all HMMs commenly used! One could calculate what the distribution of long IBD fragments are between two ancient individuals, how much time you are in a given TMRCA state for PSMC or sample paths through the Li -Stephens copying model.

While this approach is useful for obtaining summary statistics it is not good at finding a single good hidden state path through the genome like Viterbi/posterior decoding. We have some thought on that too but that is for another thread!

View full thread

You can even get close to the true fragment length distribution. Black vertical line is true mean fragment length and black curve is expected theoretical distribution. Colored dotted vertical lines are means for each decoding type

View full thread

Another strategy is to sample many decoded paths conditioned on the data. The benefit of this is that sometimes you find the short fragments! And instead of one decoded path you have many sampled paths from which you can calculate any summary statistic you want (with confidence intervals!)

We show that by sampling hidden state sequences you can accurately recover summmary statistics (black dotted line) such as: How much of our genome is archaic? How many archaic fragments of DNA is there? How long is the longest fragment? You can even do it analytically! (red curve)

View full thread

To find fragments we use is a Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) which classifies the genome into an archaic and a human state based on the SNP-density of variants not found in African genomes where there is little archaic DNA. We then "decode" the genome to find into archaic and human fragments.

Decoding is not perfect and we cannot find all the archaic DNA fragments our genomes - especially when they are short. For decoding people typically use Viterbi decoding (more accurate but misses many archaic fragments) or Posterior decoding (less accurate but finds more archaic fragments)

Archaic DNA exists in small fragments throughout your genome if we are good at finding all of them we could answers questions like: How much of our genome did we get from Neanderthals/Denisovans? When did we meet them (shorter fragments of DNA = long ago, long fragments of archaic DNA = recent)?

Laurits Skov reposted

Laurits Skov reposted

Two weeks left to apply (Jan 15) for postdoc (2.5 years) in population genetics of the Paleolithic in my group in Aarhus, Denmark. It is an interdisciplinary project with Felix Riede @felixthehauskat.bsky.social, and a new postdoc in his group covering archaeology. Apply using tinyurl.com/4jt4dru4

tinyurl.comPostdoctoral position in population genomics of the palaeolithic - Vacancy at Aarhus UniversityVacancy at Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics - BiRC - Bioinformatics Research Center, Aarhus University

Another early Christmas present in the form of another cool study! Sümer et al takes us back to life in Europe 45,000 years ago.‬ Lots of cool stories - one of them being the fact an individual (at Ranis) were related to an individual at another site (Zlatý kůň) 230 km away - Small world!

Arev P. Sümer@arevsumer.bsky.social

I am very happy to share our new paper on the genetics of some of the first modern humans who ever lived in Europe! We sequenced nuclear DNA from 13 specimens from Ranis in Germany, and found that they belonged to at least 6 individuals. www.nature.com/articles/s41... (1/n)

This is a really cool study that provides a glimpse into a distant past when humans and Neanderthal lived side by side for thousands of years. Hats off to the two first authors @leonardoiasi.bsky.social and @mchintalapati.bsky.social!

Leonardo Iasi@leonardoiasi.bsky.social

Out today in @sciencemagazine, we've journeyed into our shared history with Neandertals by analyzing over 300 present-day and ancient modern humans, including 59 individuals who lived between 2,000 and 45,000 years ago. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...

Laurits Skov reposted

You are up to date.