David Lay Williams

David Lay Williams

@laywilliams.bsky.social

Political theorist at DePaul and author of The Greatest of All Plagues: How Economic Inequality Shaped Political Thought from Plato to Marx (Princeton, 2024). Essays in NY Times, Washington Post, Time, Bloomberg, etc. Jazz Guitar, New York Mets.

8.1K followers899 following1.7K posts

Big event for political theorists and inequality scholars!

Teresa M. Bejan@tmbejan.bsky.social

Today is the official release date for my new book, First Among Equals: Visions of Equality before Egalitarianism. It explores how and why “equality” became, rather suddenly, a basis on which ordinary men and women could make political demands in early modern England. Please, check it out!

As the op-ed itself notes, I don't want to say anyone who has studied or taught business conforms to the worst implied here. But there have been very broad negative effects on the whole. The single-minded focus on profit maximization has really perverted the culture and exacerbated inequality.

David Lay Williams reposted

CDs have arrived. Excited to sell you one next Thursday night at Local Note in Evanston! Don’t have a CD player? We hear these make great paperweights, coasters, or decorations… 😅

David Lay Williams reposted

This was a great book on the corrosive impact of economic inequality. 🧵👇

David Lay Williams@laywilliams.bsky.social

1) I saw this morning that Deirdre McCloskey is posting an argument from her 2016 book (Bourgeois Equality), in which she argues that economic inequality is unproblematic. I argued in the conclusion of my last book that you could only think this if you thought social problems in very simple terms.

David Lay Williams reposted

Großartige Sammlung von Argumenten, warum die Sorge um ökonomische Ungleichheit nichts mit Neid zu tun hat.

David Lay Williams@laywilliams.bsky.social

1) I saw this morning that Deirdre McCloskey is posting an argument from her 2016 book (Bourgeois Equality), in which she argues that economic inequality is unproblematic. I argued in the conclusion of my last book that you could only think this if you thought social problems in very simple terms.

David Lay Williams reposted

🧵 on a great book (recommended for our pleonexic age)

David Lay Williams@laywilliams.bsky.social

1) I saw this morning that Deirdre McCloskey is posting an argument from her 2016 book (Bourgeois Equality), in which she argues that economic inequality is unproblematic. I argued in the conclusion of my last book that you could only think this if you thought social problems in very simple terms.

View full thread

1) I saw this morning that Deirdre McCloskey is posting an argument from her 2016 book (Bourgeois Equality), in which she argues that economic inequality is unproblematic. I argued in the conclusion of my last book that you could only think this if you thought social problems in very simple terms.

mccloskey.substack.comInequality Is Not the ProblemThe absolute condition of the poor has been raised overwhelmingly more by the Great Enrichment than by regulation or redistribution.
View full thread

1) I saw this morning that Deirdre McCloskey is posting an argument from her 2016 book (Bourgeois Equality), in which she argues that economic inequality is unproblematic. I argued in the conclusion of my last book that you could only think this if you thought social problems in very simple terms.

mccloskey.substack.comInequality Is Not the ProblemThe absolute condition of the poor has been raised overwhelmingly more by the Great Enrichment than by regulation or redistribution.
View full thread

7) This is a very small sampling of reasons we ought not to be persuaded by McCloskey and others who have argued along similar lines (e.g., Pinker, Cowen, etc.). You can't ignore moral psychology, politics, and social relations and pretend you have a political philosophy.

1) I saw this morning that Deirdre McCloskey is posting an argument from her 2016 book (Bourgeois Equality), in which she argues that economic inequality is unproblematic. I argued in the conclusion of my last book that you could only think this if you thought social problems in very simple terms.

mccloskey.substack.comInequality Is Not the ProblemThe absolute condition of the poor has been raised overwhelmingly more by the Great Enrichment than by regulation or redistribution.
View full thread

4) For another thing, Hobbes writes about how concentrated wealth instills a sense of "impunity" among the rich, a sense that the rules of morality and the laws themselves simply do not apply to them.

1) I saw this morning that Deirdre McCloskey is posting an argument from her 2016 book (Bourgeois Equality), in which she argues that economic inequality is unproblematic. I argued in the conclusion of my last book that you could only think this if you thought social problems in very simple terms.

mccloskey.substack.comInequality Is Not the ProblemThe absolute condition of the poor has been raised overwhelmingly more by the Great Enrichment than by regulation or redistribution.

2) There are a multitude of reasons why moral and political philosophers should care a great deal about issues beyond ensuring that the poor have something to eat and a place to live, including the gap between the richest and poorest. I include snippets from my book for reference.

Really delighted to see this symposium on the Greatest of All plagues in the European Journal of Political Theory. It's an honor to have such insightful and generous commentators.

View full thread

Really delighted to see this symposium on the Greatest of All plagues in the European Journal of Political Theory. It's an honor to have such insightful and generous commentators.

View full thread

Really delighted to see this symposium on the Greatest of All plagues in the European Journal of Political Theory. It's an honor to have such insightful and generous commentators.

Sharing this new Foreign Policy essay from @arturochang.bsky.social, featuring arguments from his new @princetonupress.bsky.social book, A New World of Revolutions.

Arturo Chang@arturochang.bsky.social

Thanks for the book feature, Foreign Policy! In this essay I analyze the Trump administration's recent appeals to the Monroe Doctrine and how they've moved away from its intended political vision. foreignpolicy.com/2026/07/31/t...