Lucas Castillo

Lucas Castillo

@lcastillo.bsky.social

Research Fellow at Dept. Psychology Uni Warwick | (he/his) | https://www.lucascastillo.net/

107 followers156 following14 posts

Pinned

Lucas Castillo reposted

Lucas Castillo reposted

Lucas Castillo reposted

Welcome back to Dr Lucas Castillo, who is starting an ESRC-funded postdoc with Prof. Adam Sanborn using statistical sampling algorithms as standard models of human perceptual and cognitive behaviour. Lucas recently gained his PhD in the department exploring why people are not able to act randomly.

Lucas Castillo reposted

New Preprint Out! ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€ Can people generate a random sequence if given enough time? Keep reading if - You make cognitive models with randomness in them - You like to explore the world, be creative, choose well - You want protection from clever agents exploiting patterns in your behavior. osf.io/awg9j

osf.ioOSF
View full thread

If you use randomness in cognitive models: if you were using it as a catch-all for unexplained variance then keep at it, but if your model postulates that people use random draws then consider the time frame used and if lower than 2s consider autocorrelated noise instead. (7/8)

New Preprint Out! ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€ Can people generate a random sequence if given enough time? Keep reading if - You make cognitive models with randomness in them - You like to explore the world, be creative, choose well - You want protection from clever agents exploiting patterns in your behavior. osf.io/awg9j

osf.ioOSF
View full thread

We found people's sequences are random if 2-4s elapse between items! ๐Ÿคฏ๐Ÿคฏ In the experiment we ran we asked people to do the task at two different speeds and so we could test whether it's time that matters (as in the weather) or number of items (as in card shuffles). The answer: time โŒ›โŒ›โŒ›(5/8)

If you like to be creative, explore the world, make good choices, be protected from agents exploiting patterns in your behavior: this is good news! We now know that the strategy of behaving randomly is available to humans and doesn't need much time, which is useful in all these domains. (6/8)

New Preprint Out! ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€ Can people generate a random sequence if given enough time? Keep reading if - You make cognitive models with randomness in them - You like to explore the world, be creative, choose well - You want protection from clever agents exploiting patterns in your behavior. osf.io/awg9j

osf.ioOSF
View full thread

We thought: actual random stuff isn't random instantaneously (the weather is unpredictable some time from now; a deck of cards needs a few shuffles). Maybe we haven't given people enough time? (3/8)

We analysed previous data from experiments asking people to generate sequences at random, and did our own experiment: we looked at altered versions of the sequences where we skipped some items (thinned sequences). This way we could evaluate sequences at different delays between items. (4/8)

New Preprint Out! ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€ Can people generate a random sequence if given enough time? Keep reading if - You make cognitive models with randomness in them - You like to explore the world, be creative, choose well - You want protection from clever agents exploiting patterns in your behavior. osf.io/awg9j

osf.ioOSF

Being able to generate randomness would be quite useful (to avoid others taking advantage of patterns in your behavior, to be creative, to explore your environment...) -- BUT! Research on human random generation says people cannot do this (2/8)

You are up to date.