Limot

The First Lady has come a long way. She used to be actively hostile to her position and literally wore "I don't care. Do you?" Now she feels connected to the people. This is a great idea, she would make a great peacemaker. The city could be the site of festivities, to show some Slavic culture.

Unusual Whales@unusualwhales.bsky.social

BREAKING: The White House says Melania Trump has brokered a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine "localised to the city of Oleshky".

I think there is a point of view that many people do not understand. They put themselves in my position, and assume they would want to be known by the future. This "being remembered" does not motivate me. I am more interested in creating and guiding the future rather than being remembered by it.

Limot reposted

Replying to @thedemcoalition.bsky.social

Zelensky agreed to a truce. To freeze the war. Stopping the killings is a GOOD thing, except for Democrats, who seem to be making money off the war profiteers. Republicans are probably also making money off the war, but they are not so disgustingly shameless about it like Democrats.

Huge miseducation of science == People are taught, I am not making this up, this is literal - that "science" = "peer reviewed published." This training is fundamentally unscientific. Peer reviewed published material CAN be valid science. It can also be total nonsense, junk.

Review by 1 or 2 people who can be counted as "peers" (as in, fellow professors or researchers) does not and cannot guarantee scientific accuracy. Same way, a message in an article or written on a paper inside a bottle that washed ashore, CAN be valid science. This is fundamental to science.

Science does not adhere to your preconceptions. YOU have to learn science. "Peer reviewed published" is form, as opposed to content. This miseducation is something that every schoolteacher, every college professor should be ashamed of. But they seem proud, not ashamed, of mis-teaching students.

There are reports that the Nordstream bombing (which Zelenskyites blamed on Russia) accused has admitted he was acting on orders from Zelensky. Proved: It wasn't Russia at all but Zelensky. American MSM - silence. If you blindly trust the MSM, you need to grow up. It is evil, EVIL to trust them.

Limot reposted

apnews.comMore polio cases now caused by vaccine than by wild virusLONDON (AP) — Four African countries have reported new cases of polio linked to the oral vaccine, as global health numbers show there are now more children being paralyzed by viruses originating in va...

Replying to @1kr5ur43m.bsky.social

Ah, the good old days when vaccine makers knew how to make vaccines. (At this point, vaccine makers have idiots instead of scientists. The idiots can do nothing but science mistakes and marketing/coverup miracles, such as paying shills to post/like memes on Internet.) apnews.com/article/heal...

New York Democrat Conspiracy Theory = There is a very clever marketing scheme from Big Pharma. They have created a measles vaccine that once in a while sheds live virus and affects people nearly with measles. They use this to create a measles scare, to sell more vaccines. And more measles scare.

OFFICIALLY invested in vaccine manufacturers, which to me seems criminal. Anyway, the New York Democrats are taking advantage of the tight party line control of the Democrat party, and are going fully tyranny on the Amish in search of more and more Big Pharma revenue.

@mayor.nyc.gov Many people think you are honest. In your state, this massive fraud is occurring, and you have nothing to say in defense of the Amish people, the Big Pharma fraud, and your governor's @governor.ny.gov shameless attack on US Constitution? Please take a stand.

The Amish are a glitch in the ointment, for they do not vaccinate and therefore provide a "control group." Anybody can point to the Amish "How come they are not suffering?" The New York governor and other Democrats appear to be on kickbacks from Big Pharma. According to X tweets, the state has

In Hindi, Buddha has two meanings, pronounced differently but with same spelling. Buddha can refer to Shakya Gautam, the founder of Buddhism. It can also refer to an old man. Ex called me telling me I was no Buddha. When was Buddha smoking cigarettes, and arguing with random strangers?

On a related note "They log on when they want, log off when they wants, without replying to everyting..." Yeah. That's how it works. Nobody is paying for my time, I am just another social media contributor (who holds that he clearly isn't really just another..., but that view isn't accepted.)

So if you aren't willing to publicly say even my name, but keep calling me "They" or "him" or some weird axe pronoun... What exactly is it I owe you? Nothing, and any expectations otherwise are rude.

This was out of the blue, I never told her (or anybody) I am Buddha. But I explained to her that I am a retired old guy unable to get any work, and having all day with nothing to do but argue with strangers on internet. Retired old guy is also "buddha" in Hindi. So I am not Buddha. I am buddha. 😁

I called the ambulances demanding payment, as marking USA as the most "uncivilized" of nations. Thinking it over there is a fine line. We cannot allow people to use ambulances as free taxis for a hospital trip. But ambulances take folks away from accident scenes. Asking for payment is uncivilized.

Cornell has this weird death cult. I don't know if it is still happening. But every few months, there used to be a death on campus. As the days without deaths went on, the tension on campus used to mount. Who is it going to be? Once a death happened, the pressure released. Everybody felt safe on

campus, at least for a few months. Therefore, campus deaths were celebratory events. Release of a pressure valve. That's one messed up campus.

I am not suggesting for anyone to not vote = Voting is a civic duty. That said, it is a personal choice. For instance, I feel I have done a LOT of civic duty, so that I don't have to feel obliged. Your personal equation may vary. If you have done a lot more civic duty than I, you may even feel

of, and in the past, often I have voted party line, depending on which party I liked more at the time. Occasionally I have voted for third parties. But even Third party candidates could be Israelis or Trumpists. It would require a lot of homework to find out which candidates satisfy my

requirements. Given my personal civic duty equation it may not make sense for me to do that much homework, especially if it seems I am the extreme minority and nobody could care less about the harms to the country caused by Democrats, Israelis, or Trumpists. Within your equation, voting is a duty.

qualified to lecture me, but yes, that's your personal equation. The problem for me is I do not want to vote for any Democrat, I do not want to vote for any Israel supporter, and I do not want to vote for any Trumpists. Leaves me little choice. Usually, the ballot is a list of names I haven't heard

Grok says that while there does exist research suggesting Graphene addition to Aviation fuel, the research apparently wasn't actually followed up on.

People vaccinated with a measles vaccine, shed the vaccine virus on others. That creates measles epidemics. Like ghouls, Big Pharma is constantly searching for a death which can be classified as "From Measles", so they can eat off it. But really, the selfish vaccinated people are creating measles.

Trans is the ultimate domination of women by men. A man can up and declare "I feel like a woman", and take women's bathrooms, be placed in their jail cells, take their medals. There is nothing women have men can't invade. The domination is so utter, so total, that so called Feminists supported it.

Wealth vs. money = In first grad school, once I spent an entire summer watching a movie every single evening. I wasn't trying to do that, it's just that everyday somebody was going to a movie and they would ask me and I never said no. The on-campus movies cost $1, which was cheap even back then.

I doubt that just having more money makes life richer. If I had a lot of money compared to other grad students, it mightn't have been fun. Some of the fun was because everybody else had roughly similar monetary positions, they knew each other's monetary positions and everything was planned to fit.

That was the first time I was at Yale graduate school. I spent a few years out in the industry, and then returned again. The second time around, the experience was quite different. That was some of the times when I have felt the poorest. It all balances out, I guess.

a lot of money, but about having a rich and very interesting life, and enough money to maintain that rich interesting life. I mean, I had enough left over to join Yale Flying Club, which cost a princely sum, $25/hour of flight training. My Sailing Club membership was free, iirc.

What about time? I dunno. I really don't understand, but somehow there was enough time to do everything, and I never skimped on sleep. I could go home at 4 in the morning occasionally, but would sleep until afternoon. So that's my idea of a rich life. Yes, you need some money.

The stipend money wasn't a lot but covered my room and board with enough left over for eating out, not infrequently. Back then, I think things were comparatively cheaper. When a job like Research or Teaching Assistant came long, I had a ton of money by my standards. I watched entire movie series,

and most popular campus movies. (Yes, I saw Soylent Green where they talk about Carbon Dioxide causing oceans to boil. I didn't know anything about it back then but sounded interesting and totally believable.) I think that was close to the richest I have ever felt. The richness wasn't about having

The same with going out for pizza and beer, Chinese food, or sandwiches. I was never too busy (though I did create something deep and heavy called /dev/pty around then) and was always out to have fun. Graduate students are supposed to be poverty ridden. I honestly never felt a pinch.

American medical research is amazing. Not kidding, not sarcastic, the medical literature is amazing. But people don't know about it for the most part, because nobody is incentivized to bring it to you. Somebody has to buy advertisements from MSM, somebody has to pay social media influencers...

painstakingly, but Democrats destroyed that in their eternal control seeking.

Note: "Buy advertisements from MSM" isn't about the advertisements per se. They don't expect anybody to care about the ads, nor do they expect sales to move due to ads. They have much bigger levers to move sales. Ads are just a legal way to payoff MSM for supporting Big Pharma business interests.

That money can be spent only if there is a reasonable, fair, expectation of return. What the public sees is the tip of the iceberg, and the tip is NOT what would help public health. What the public sees is strictly limited by a reasonable business case, about potential returns.

And that is the angle which drives all medical "science" that you see, via MSM. This is strongly buttressed by paying for fraudulent business-serving research, which research is not going to lack for media coverage. There used to be this concept of scientific integrity that people had created

We don't have "Facts" in science. That's politicians trying to take over science with their worldview. In science we have measurements. They can be wrong. In science we have theories. They can be wrong. The politician wants religious dogma, and calls it "facts". We don't have those in science.

Many scientists are also politicians/priests at heart pretending to be scientists, for advantage. These "scientists" keep trying to turn science into a collection of dogma. E.g. they want to have "Laws" rather than Theory. They don't understand that even "Laws" are not unquestionable in science.

Big difference between Politicians, (Ideal) Scientists = To a politician, admitting a mistake is like ingesting excrement. To a scientist, admitting a mistake is honest behavior, and is a step in overcoming human ego. Politician intensifies and lives for ego, scientist is supposed to minimize it.

As a scientist, I think the Politicians' saying of "admitting mistake = ingesting excrement" shows they have filthy, filthy minds. Democrat takeover of science not only brings the filthy political mind into science, but they use power so their attitude controls science. This is bad for everyone.

Limot reposted

22 Sept

Replying to @thetnholler.bsky.social

Seems like somebody should be brought up on attempted murder changes? This ICE stupidity that Democrats caused, but have no spine to face, has gone on long enough.

Limot reposted

Replying to @deanobeidallah.bsky.social

No. Democrats can also lose the midterms if enough people in the USA decide that honesty and goodness matter. Democrats were an amazingly evil nightmare. They used false science to brainwash susceptible young children, making rules to make it illegal to inform parents, while rushing the children

So there is a meaning of "science" I grew up with. In the USA, there is a brand new meaning of science, which is roughly. Science consists of a set of facts. These facts may not be questioned, you are not entitled to your own facts. The facts come from obvious authorities, and can be backed up by

So there was this "beekeeper" theory of management. The beekeeper doesn't need to understand the language of bees, she just needs to know how to collect the honey. So scientists are the bees who make the honey, then the honey of "facts" are extracted by billionaires and politicians.

In that worldview, and seeing their science - climate, vaccines, trans, masks... We have some really inept beekeepers! Somehow, they have been managing to extract excrement, not honey.

"research", which "research" means a certain format of publication. This is bizarre to me. Science is about questioning the universe. We measure and theorize, we do not dictate to the universe. Politicians wish to dictate, because that's their worldview. It's just a question with them of "Who