Rachel reposted
Replying to @dbernstein.bsky.social
… Meanwhile, as @juliaazari.bsky.social writes today, many Democrats are failing their moral duty on this, and probably for no good reason open.substack.com/pub/goodpoli...
Rachel
@lrigknat.bsky.social
A nerd on a journey beyond space and time
201 followers231 following702 posts
Rachel reposted
Replying to @dbernstein.bsky.social
… Meanwhile, as @juliaazari.bsky.social writes today, many Democrats are failing their moral duty on this, and probably for no good reason open.substack.com/pub/goodpoli...
Rachel reposted
Social scientists have lent our names to calls for electoral system change and rule of law, because of the findings of our disciplines. We should do the same for anti-trans ads, which have dubious benefit and demonstrable harm. My latest at GP/BP goodpoliticsbadpolitics.substack.com/p/social-sci...
Rachel reposted
Bloody cowards. This has to stop and *now*. Out with the people doing this, advising this, thinking this is okay. Out out out.
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC - @electdemocrats.bsky.social) is running anti-trans ads now, so I don't know how you can say the party itself isn't embracing transphobia. There are still some good Dems out there, but transphobia is apparently a party value.
Rachel reposted
On the road and forgot to tweet out my item this morning: The Expectations Game, other things that have no consequences, and things that do matter a whole lot goodpoliticsbadpolitics.substack.com/p/ah-expecta...
Rachel reposted
What is Trump’s closing message? Mostly France- and trans-bashing. My new one: open.substack.com/pub/goodpoli...
Rachel reposted
Rep. Delia C. Ramirez has introduced a bill that would abolish not just ICE, but the DHS altogether, repealing the 2002 law establishing the agency and replacing it with one focused on protecting civil and human rights.
Rachel reposted
Dominance Politics, Elite Gatekeeping and Jon Ossoff talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/domin...
Rachel reposted
Today's item from the Dep't of It Only Gets Worse Before It Gets Even Worse: Jim Jordan as House Minority Leader? Yeah, this'll go well. Or: What happens when no one in the party even knows what a leader is suppoed to do? At GP/BP. goodpoliticsbadpolitics.substack.com/p/the-next-h...
Rachel reposted
I wrote about the Republicans, with their information-free administration and their post-policy Members of Congress and, gee whiz, it isn't working. Plus all the links. goodpoliticsbadpolitics.substack.com/p/the-gop-go...
Rachel reposted
This semester has turned me into actual roadkill already somehow, but I still got a blog post together goodpoliticsbadpolitics.substack.com/p/studying-f...
Rachel reposted
Is there finally progress on making the Senate younger? Perhpas. Sort of. Maybe. I do through the numbers, at GP/BP goodpoliticsbadpolitics.substack.com/p/old-old-se...
Rachel reposted
Transportation Committee votes on amendments tomorrow at 9:30AM! Come make your voice heard!
NEW: Alexis Mercedes Rinck has proposed an amendment to Rob Saka's SAFER Streets Act that would give the City Traffic Engineer explicit authority to implement street changes in historic districts (Pioneer Square, Pike Place) without getting the approval of the local boards.
Rachel reposted
I wrote in defense of horse race coverage of politics. goodpoliticsbadpolitics.substack.com/p/the-stakes...
Rachel reposted
Rachel reposted
Re-upping today's: All about what collective self-government means. Hooked to the data center backlash. Smooshed together a lot here so hope it reads OK and certain some disagree - but I think there's good stuff here and hope folks like it. goodpoliticsbadpolitics.substack.com/p/data-cente...
Rachel reposted
Rachel reposted
I'd be a lot more sick of Julia's (terrific) book if it didn't keep being immediately relevant to our current politics. Which is only going to get more so if/when Dems run the House and have to deal with impeachment.
If you're not sick of me and my book yet, here we are on the New Books Network www.google.com/url?q=https:...
Rachel reposted
You should pre-order this book from real experts on building more trustworthy systems.
Did I mention that we've been writing a book? Fundamentally, security, privacy, trust&safety, AI safety -- all the fields aimed at dealing with dealing with how technical systems hurt people and how to avoid it -- share a foundation. We cover how to think and achieve *truly* effective practice. 1/
Rachel reposted
Midterm Madness: Platner and the Dem version of a Sutter Complex, Trump unifying the out-party, the drill on election-stealing, and the big dog-not-barking (It's SCOTUS so far). My new one. goodpoliticsbadpolitics.substack.com/p/fighting-d...
Rachel reposted
Rachel reposted
Replying to @juliaazari.bsky.social
and i wrote a book that might be of interest press.princeton.edu/books/hardco...
Rachel reposted
Rachel reposted
If only someone could figure out how to make milk safe to drink! It'd be such a big deal the process would be named after them.
Idaho health officials are investigating how nearly 60 people got sick after drinking raw milk in the past two weeks. The Idaho Department of Health and Welfare says they didn't name two dairies potentially linked to the outbreak “because this is a potential risk for any raw milk producer.”
Rachel reposted
Now that everyone has moved on from the DNC report, I wrote about it. What would a well-designed report do? And why no one has any incentive to do it. open.substack.com/pub/goodpoli...
Rachel reposted
Rachel reposted
AOC doesn't need me to give her career advice, but I foolishly went and did it anyway. Plus all the links. goodpoliticsbadpolitics.substack.com/p/aocs-future
Rachel reposted
In @nytopinion.nytimes.com The first step in truly reining in the Supreme Court "is to remember that the republic — and the Constitution that brought it to life — is meant for us. It is ours to interpret and ours to transform,” our columnist Jamelle Bouie writes.
Rachel reposted
Certainly. But remember: It. Doesn't. Work. He does this crap, and he just gets more and more unpopular. He was unpopular first-term during good times, and he's unpopular now. Of course people should call him out on it, but he hasn't discovered some secret formula for anything.
Part of Trump’s general pattern of: Create a completely self-inflicted catastrophe; eventually retreat; declare victory & pat self on the back for partially “solving” the problem you caused.
Rachel reposted
The new focus of @smotus.bsky.social's newsletter is fantastic and pressing - the STAKES of the upcoming nomination contests for American democracy. There's not a better political science blogger - or person - for you to support!* *except for Jonathan and David and me
Rachel reposted
The paperback copy of Congress's Constitution is currently 50% off if you order directly from the @yalepress.bsky.social website! yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300...
Rachel reposted
Rachel reposted
Josh Marshall: The Supreme Court's corruption runs so deep there is simply little effort any more to hide it. The Court no longer has any consistent or even comprehensible jurisprudence. It simply has political goals it seeks to achieve.
Rachel reposted
Looking at the midterms after the Iran cease fire. Plus: Links! @dandrezner.bsky.social @smotus.bsky.social @dcinbox.bsky.social @normornstein.bsky.social @rickhasen.bsky.social @donmoyn.bsky.social and more goodpoliticsbadpolitics.substack.com/p/10-midterm...
Rachel reposted
Wrote about impeaching Trump - again - and the options available to next year's (likely) Democratic House majority. goodpoliticsbadpolitics.substack.com/p/impeachmen...
Rachel reposted
oh look at that www.pew.org/en/research-...
Rachel reposted
Women’s progress in attaining elected office stalled in 2024. Yesterday we got a first look at whether 2026 will change that trajectory. My new one: open.substack.com/pub/goodpoli...
Rachel reposted
Rachel reposted
Rachel reposted
On AOC '28. Plus the links @johnsides.bsky.social @lizsuhay.bsky.social @jennmjacksonphd.bsky.social @dandrezner.bsky.social @smotus.bsky.social @mirandayaver.bsky.social and more all at GP/BP goodpoliticsbadpolitics.substack.com/p/aoc-28
Rachel reposted
Really excellent @jonathanbernstein.bsky.social column today on how to think about presidential primaries. open.substack.com/pub/goodpoli...
Rachel reposted
Finally got around to reading Backlash Presidents and it's so, so good. I learn so much from @juliaazari.bsky.social. Totally recommend. press.princeton.edu/books/hardco...
Rachel reposted
_Strength In Numbers_ gains more strength as it gains more numbers. Spitting distance from being a top-50 publication on Substack. Join us! (a free sub gets you at least two articles a week — a pretty good deal for time invested, IMO) gelliottmorris.com/subscribe
Rachel reposted
NEW: There are 2,400+ elections for DA & sheriff this year. These matter hugely to criminal justice & policing—including: *these are often officials who decide ICE collaboration.* So I took a dive into these 2,400+ races to identify early hotspots and battlegrounds. Read, & check out our maps:
Rachel reposted
Replying to @jonathanbernstein.bsky.social
Also I'll immodestly say: I think @juliaazari.bsky.social and @dbernstein.bsky.social and I have been good guides to [all this] and if you haven't subscribed you should, and also I'll invite y'all to support us and keep us going with a paid subscription. goodpoliticsbadpolitics.substack.com
Rachel reposted
Wrote a thing about whether the American presidency even exists anymore. No reason. open.substack.com/pub/goodpoli...
Rachel reposted
Everything Jamelle says. Plus: The problem with doomer expectations of "canceling" elections (other than it's annoying) is there are real things Trump/GOP might do to attempt to impede fully free & fair elections and doomerism doesn't go well with preparing to counter and resist those real dangers.
the question to ask about this is, okay, he wants to cancel the midterms. how does he get the VA state board of elections to cancel the midterms? how does he get the georgia board of elections to do it? how does he convince republican house members to quit their jobs and give up their paychecks?