Marianne de Heer Kloots

Marianne de Heer Kloots

@mdhk.net

Linguist in AI & CogSci 🧠👩‍💻🤖 PhD student @illc-uva.bsky.social 🌐 https://mdhk.net/ 🐘 https://scholar.social/@mdhk 🐦 https://twitter.com/mariannedhk

1.3K followers590 following148 posts

Marianne de Heer Kloots reposted

Replying to @daanmulderdaan.bsky.social

door AI dreigen we nu te verliezen wat ons uiteindelijk mens maakt: andermans teksten beoordelen op gebruik van AI

Marianne de Heer Kloots reposted

🤖🧠NEW PAPER🧠🤖 What is the relationship between neural networks & symbolic systems? Based on evidence from mechanistic interpretability, we argue for a quasi-symbolic view of cognition: Neural nets implement symbols but only approximately Link: www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti... 1/n

Marianne de Heer Kloots reposted

I’m presenting this today at #SNL2026 in Geneva! See you at poster A5 in the morning session 🎉

Laura Gwilliams@lauragwilliams.bsky.social

check out our latest preprint led by the one and only @mdhk.net !! using intracranial EEG, we find that distinct neural populations within the temporal lobe encode preceding context, and future context, during naturalistic speech comprehension! www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...

Marianne de Heer Kloots reposted

the Gwilliams Lab and friends are at SNL 2026!! if you're into speech comprehension, intracranial and non-invasive time series, from single neurons to the whole cortex, across ages, using both classic linguistic approaches and advanced ML techniques - we've got something for you! 🧠 🌀 ✨

Marianne de Heer Kloots reposted

To make sense of speech, listeners must segment sound streams into pieces. Across languages, people do so based more on consonants than vowels. A new @science.org study investigates the phenomenon via EEG recording in humans & dogs, finding that dogs also show consonant bias in word segmentation.🗣️🐶🧪

science.orgNeural evidence that dogs segment the speech they hear with a humanlike consonant biasAcross many human languages, consonants carry more lexical information than vowels. During speech segmentation, humans, unlike nonhuman primates, rely more on consonant than vowel patterns, despite vo...

Marianne de Heer Kloots reposted

📣📣📣 Preprint Alert! 📣📣📣 Do predictive processes shape brain representations during learning? We investigated the effect of Predictive Coding by training identical recurrent networks with different optimization procedures and then comparing them to human EEG under the same visual learning task.

Marianne de Heer Kloots reposted

Marianne de Heer Kloots reposted

🦀New preprint! (w/ @najoung.bsky.social)🦞 Is grammaticality a major organizing principle of NLM representations? We show that many NLMs exhibit abstract rep. separation for grammaticality. We believe this work addresses debates about confounds in measuring model gram. knowledge. [1/10]

LLMs are everywhere, as are companies advertising LLM-powered products by their “beyond-human” performance levels. But how do LLMs *actually* fare against humans across the board? Join our effort to organize empirical evidence from the field into a systematic and publicly accessible overview ⬇️

Lukas Edman@lukasnlp.bsky.social

Ever feel like it's too hard to keep track of what LLMs cannot do as well as humans? We're making your life easier over at: what-llms-can-not-do.github.io We're compiling a list of papers testing the abilities of LLMs against humans. Check it out! And you can help contribute too!

Marianne de Heer Kloots reposted

I fear that placing too much emphasis on a specific interpretation of dimensionality, or treating dimensionality as an end-all quantification of some aspect of neural computation, may lead us down the wrong path, writes @mattperich.bsky.social. #neuroskyence www.thetransmitter.org/neural-dynam...

thetransmitter.orgDimensionality—neuroscience’s red herring?Placing too much emphasis on a specific interpretation of dimensionality may lead neuroscience down the wrong path.

The reading group I've been organizing is entering its 4th academic year of existence! We'll have our first meeting of this year this Thursday, with @gretatuckute.bsky.social and @klemenkotar.bsky.social presenting recent work on their AuriStream model 🧠🔊 dnn-speech.github.io

dnn-speech.github.io(D)NN-Speech Reading GroupWe are a reading group meeting regularly to discuss papers on speech-based deep learning models and their use in modelling human speech processing and acquisition!

Marianne de Heer Kloots reposted

look at my new babylm paper! arxiv.org/abs/2609.11870 basically, i initialize token embeddings with representations from an image encoder rather than randomly and then train text-only as usual. kind of a visual demonstration to start off the word learning process

I’m presenting this today at #CLIN36 in Brussels! See you at poster 25 in the afternoon session 🎉

Let’s study learning trajectories in self-supervised speech models! 🔊 Do they reflect the hierarchical organization of spoken language? We have analyzed a lot of training checkpoints to find out 🌠 Preprint: arxiv.org/abs/2604.02043 ⬇️

Marianne de Heer Kloots reposted

🤖🧠NEW PAPER🧠🤖 (The result of an 8-year project!) LLMs seem very different from symbolic systems. Yet LLMs excel in symbolic domains (e.g., language/code/math). How do they do it? Our finding: LLM representations have implicit symbolic structure! Link in thread ⬇️ 1/n

Marianne de Heer Kloots reposted

New preprint 🐝🧵 arxiv.org/abs/2608.25779 Bee species signal food via their waggle dance in different ways. Species with horizontal combs point straight at food. Species with vertical combs dance relative to gravity instead. How could a population evolve from one system to the other?

Marianne de Heer Kloots reposted

New Blog post: Which Data Repository Should you Use? In light of OSF closing down, I compare Zenodo, Dataverse, ResearchBox, PsychArchive, and local repositories on six important dimensions. If you want to know which to pick: It depends! daniellakens.blogspot.com/2026/08/whic...

daniellakens.blogspot.comWhich Data Repository Should You Use?The Center for Open Science has announced that from November 16, 2026, no new projects can be created on the Open Science Framework. After F...

Marianne de Heer Kloots reposted

Let’s study learning trajectories in self-supervised speech models! 🔊 Do they reflect the hierarchical organization of spoken language? We have analyzed a lot of training checkpoints to find out 🌠 Preprint: arxiv.org/abs/2604.02043 ⬇️

Marianne de Heer Kloots reposted

Our ability to speak involves remarkable feats of motor sequencing that most of us take completely for granted. The new issue of @science.org has a fascinating essay by Sergey Stavisky, covering his team's use of brain-computer interfaces to restore speech for people with neurological injuries. 🧠🗣️🧪👇

science.orgRegaining your voiceAI speech neuroprostheses can restore day-to-day communication after neurological injury

Marianne de Heer Kloots reposted

What's more nonsensical: smashing a pumpkin using a number, or growing flowers inside a sneeze? Our paper on graded inconceivability is out now in Cognition! Come for the cognitive science 🧠🔍, stay for the whimsy 🌼🧚! 🔗Journal link: bit.ly/gradedInconCog

Tomer Ullman@tomerullman.bsky.social

Now out (for realz) in Cognition: "People Make Graded Judgments About The Inconceivable" (by Hu, Sosa, & me) Free preprint: www.tomerullman.org/papers/grade... Journal link: bit.ly/gradedInconCog @jennhu.bsky.social @cognitionjournal.bsky.social

View full thread
Sathvik@sathvik.bsky.social

What (if anything) can LLMs tell us about human language processing? I discuss this question and how psycholinguistics is moving forward with @colinphillips.bsky.social , to appear in BBS as a commentary on Futrell & Mahowald's article about LLMs & linguistics. arxiv.org/abs/2604.09466

Centre for Language Evolution@uoe-cle.bsky.social

New commentary by Jennifer Culbertson, @simonkirby.bsky.social & @kennysmithed.bsky.social in response to @futrell.bsky.social & @kmahowald.bsky.social 2025: #Language models do not yet achieve explanatory adequacy because language is more than incremental prediction. 🔗https://tinyurl.com/3nufv5hp

View full thread
Raphaël Millière@raphaelmilliere.com

My commentary on @kmahowald.bsky.social & @futrell.bsky.social's excellent BBS paper on the relevance and significance of LLMs for linguistics is now out, along with many other peer commentaries: www.cambridge.org/core/journal... (preprint to follow)

Mark Dingemanse@markdingemanse.net

Out now! For robust research, center values, not technology, w/ Christine Cuskley DOI doi.org/10.1017/S014... PDF pure.mpg.de/rest/items/i... Our commentary on "How linguistics learned to stop worrying and love the language models" by Futrell & Mahowald

View full thread
Stefan Hartmann@stefanhartmann.bsky.social

Very happy to see this out: @bbunzeck.bsky.social, Sina Zarrieß, Elena Lieven and I have commented on @futrell.bsky.social & @kmahowald.bsky.social's excellent and thought-provoking BBS target article on LLMs and linguistics. I also enjoyed reading the other commentaries a lot!

^ I hope the link above gives access to everyone, otherwise find the preprint here ⬇️

'Tis the season to preprint BBS commentaries; I'm happy to share ours too! 🎄✨ The textual basis of current LLMs causes trouble, but linguistically relevant insights *can* be found in systems modelling the more natural form of human spoken language: the speech signal itself. arxiv.org/abs/2512.14506

I can highly recommend the full treatment, incl. the target article and all other commentaries, for a great set of current perspectives on everything Linguistics ∩ LLMs!

Kyle Mahowald@kmahowald.bsky.social

The full BBS treatment from me and @futrell.bsky.social on "How linguistics learned to stop worrying and love the LMs" is now out, with all the commentaries and our response. If you "Save PDF", it will give you the whole target article + commentary + response pdf: www.cambridge.org/core/journal...

Marianne de Heer Kloots reposted

The full BBS treatment from me and @futrell.bsky.social on "How linguistics learned to stop worrying and love the LMs" is now out, with all the commentaries and our response. If you "Save PDF", it will give you the whole target article + commentary + response pdf: www.cambridge.org/core/journal...

cambridge.orgHow linguistics learned to stop worrying and love the language models | Behavioral and Brain Sciences | Cambridge CoreHow linguistics learned to stop worrying and love the language models - Volume 49