Media Pundit

Media Pundit

@mediapundit.bsky.social

Writer and sometimes film reviewer. Published online at Seven Stories magazine. Working on my first novel! Letterboxd: https://bit.ly/46ipvlF. Blog: https://tinyurl.com/mud3xvz4

863 followers1.3K following1.9K posts

I’m surprised there isn’t more Carrie 2026 discourse considering a) adaptation of a legendary film/book, b) hugely popular, c) major and controversial changes to the source material. #Carrie

It is probably possible to make genuine art/products with AI, and even use it to enable things with a creative spark. The problem is that the spam merchants will always out produce the artists.

Casey S. Pumpkins 🎃@caseyexplosion.bsky.social

I wish I was exaggerating, 16 games from one dev, all AI slop, all clones of something else, all pumped out in the space of months. That's my experience of what AI tools are enabling, not creativity, not anyone's dream game, but spam. Constant, low effort, neverending, AI generated spam.

The best ROI with AI comes from button mashing and spamming a million variations on the same thing, until you get lucky. There’s no barrier to doing it, so why not? The only people it hurts are the consumer and the entire creative ecosystem, not the person making it.

Random example: late in the book it becomes clear that the Nazis will lose the war, the camp will be shut down, and Doll will probably be executed. He thinks about how successful the Nazi regime has been, with these facts fully in mind, and gives it a 2.5 out of 3. #TheZoneofInterest

Media Pundit@mediapundit.bsky.social

On the other hand, it also gets deeper into the psychology and history of its characters. Paul Doll, the fictionalised version of Hoss is one of the most compellingly pathetic depictions of evil I can remember reading. #TheZoneofInterest

View full thread

Basically people who are skilled at office politics and working their way up hierarchies, but complete blundering dumbasses in every other area. #TheZoneofInterest

Picture a guy who was all-in on crypto in 2021 and who is now all-in on AI, and that’s Paul Doll. Only with Nazism as the ‘in’ thing. #TheZoneofInterest

Random example: late in the book it becomes clear that the Nazis will lose the war, the camp will be shut down, and Doll will probably be executed. He thinks about how successful the Nazi regime has been, with these facts fully in mind, and gives it a 2.5 out of 3. #TheZoneofInterest

Media Pundit@mediapundit.bsky.social

On the other hand, it also gets deeper into the psychology and history of its characters. Paul Doll, the fictionalised version of Hoss is one of the most compellingly pathetic depictions of evil I can remember reading. #TheZoneofInterest

His main justification is the Nazi party getting 37% in the 1933 election, thus demonstrating that Germans support them more than any other party in history. #TheZoneofInterest

Doll constantly thinks to himself that he is completely normal, which is partly desperate rationalisation- he is very, very evil- and partly sort of true. If you work in any sort of corporate hierarchy you probably know a few people like Doll. #TheZoneofInterest

View full thread

On the other hand, it also gets deeper into the psychology and history of its characters. Paul Doll, the fictionalised version of Hoss is one of the most compellingly pathetic depictions of evil I can remember reading. #TheZoneofInterest

What the film has going for it is being completely realistic and lacking in drama. It’s a slice-of-life depiction of the Kommandant of Auschwitz, and the deadness of the camera adds to the horror. #TheZoneofInterest

The book has a ‘plot,‘ and ‘subplots’ and all of things you would find in an ordinary story, which is arguably unnecessary given the gravity of its subject matter. #TheZoneofInterest

Media Pundit reposted

Much like the bioterrorism panic and grey goo, "memetic hazards" are also just vestigial fear of the USSR repackaged for the 1990s. There is no such thing as a "superhuman persuader" in practical terms.

This post is unavailable.
View full thread
View full thread
View full thread

Romantasy tropes which don’t appear in this book: 8)Lots of sex: I don’t think there was any sex in this book, even offscreen. The main couple get a few charged moments, and that’s it. One of the characters was the lesbian mistress of the Queen, but we don’t get much detail on that.

View full thread

7)Everyone is white: yeah. Ellis explains this, IMO charitably, as being driven by authors not wanting to overstep any bounds regarding racism, appropriation etc. Although the result is that the genre as a whole is racially problematic in a different way.

View full thread

5) Human in a world of x: typically faeries, vampires, elves etc. This trope kind of appears but not really. It’s more like ‘country girl in a world of vaguely sinister, mask-wearing city folk.’ Which, kind of like Faeries I guess?

View full thread

Necromancy also drives the core plot of the book, which is Azul’s attempt to resurrect her sister. Unfortunately, that requires her to physically touch her sister’s missing bones. Again, not a bad idea for a story. Simple, understandable, high stakes.

View full thread

4) Main character is a something-bender: Azul is a necromancer, which means she can bring anything back to life (and to some degree control it) using bones. Which is one of the cooler parts of the book, actually.

Necromancy allows for some of the best world building ideas (for example, that the world is literally built on the bones of the gods). It’s also surprisingly versatile.

View full thread

The male romantic lead is kind of horrible to Azul, being that he is an Emissary of Death, an organisation which religiously persecutes necromancers. On the other hand, he’s not super good looking and kind of breaks the mould in other ways, so I would give it half a point.

View full thread

3) Dark Fuck Prince male romantic lead: Ellis describes this as kind of like Beauty and the Beast, except that the beast is ugly on the…inside. Which is weird. So the male romantic lead is a super hot aristocrat but absolutely horrible to the main character.

View full thread

Going through the tropes, kind of in order of importance. 1) Underdog female main character: Azul is a 19-year-old necromancer in a world where necromancers are persecuted. So yep.

Malfoy has three characteristics: 1) Racist jerk 2) Kind of meh at everything 3) Blonde The fact that the HP fandom is obsessed with him doesn’t say good things about the fandom. #Malfoy

View full thread

Going to the ‘new’ section in the library is the closest thing to literally picking a book at random. Also brings to mind Orwell’s comment about not finding out how terrible most books are before he started reviewing them. #MistressofBones

Personally I am only interested in AI art/literature etc if a) it is genuinely exceptional or game-changing in some way, or b) it couldn't possibly have been made without AI. I don't think I have (yet) seen any examples of either. #AI

Mostly unrelated but I dreamed last night that I bought a Lego set for £400, and it was haunted. I think I was mostly upset about the price.

Mar Hicks@histoftech.bsky.social

A haunted house where every room has several colleagues to whom you owe work, or email responses