This is a near perfect article whose only defect is the fact that it refers to them as Dan Sullivans rather than the correct Dans Sullivan. www.washingtonsun.com/national/dan...
Molly Reynolds
Molly Reynolds
@mollyereynolds.bsky.social
Senior Fellow, @brookings.edu. Still not the Senate Parliamentarian.
19.2K followers206 following564 posts
You say the ghost of the chief justice, I say the Thundering Herd.
Just took a survey that asked if I would support the institution of "Marshall law" to maintain order during elections. I assume that's when you summon the ghost of John Marshall to straighten things out?? Proofread your instruments, people!
Real ones are holding out for a return by @ringwiss.bsky.social for a joint appearance with Wick.
Policy/rules wonks assemble: Tom Wickham, former House parliamentarian, kicks off tomorrow’s show with @pkcapitol.bsky.social at 11am ET.
If they do this, I'm going to have to find a new name for my band because no one will know what Intervening Day refers to www.semafor.com/article/10/0...
"As time goes on, this will all pass away into memory, into a story with a beginning and a middle and finally an end. And that transition from the real into fable will bring its own kind of comfort and pain... I am only humbled: to be here, to be alive." www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/wel...
wherein Tom Edsall just goes and tells the world one of my greatest secrets: what happens when you ask @sarahbinder.bsky.social a question via email. www.nytimes.com/2026/06/23/o...
"Getting as far as to get disqualified from the ballot by an election official" definitely still counts as "running" for the purposes of my "Are you required to run for Senate at some point if you live in Alaska and are named Dan Sullivan?" line of inquiry, for the record.
!! JUNEAU, Alaska (AP) — US Senate candidate with same name as incumbent Sen. Dan Sullivan ineligible for Alaska ballot, election official rules.
Add in former Anchorage mayor Dan A. Sullivan's short-lived 2016 run and one has to ask: are you *required* to run for Senate at some point if you live in Alaska and are named Dan Sullivan?
New — Sullivan v. Sullivan How Dan S. Sullivan, the senator, sees his new GOP challenger — Dan J. Sullivan — as a major threat that could siphon away votes and boost Mary Peltola in critical #aksen Accuses him of being a Dem plant Dems say they had NO involvement J speaks:
"discharge petitions successfully forcing action" is to the 119th congress as "suspension bills aren't just for post offices any more" was to the 118th.
To be fair, Hill journalists were raised on "discharge petition, a procedure that never works in the real world" and they're suddenly living in a very different world. Can't emphasize how much *this never happens* in the modern House. It just doesn't.
(h/t @sarahbinder.bsky.social + Frances Lee, who did the interview from which it comes)
"What in the world does 'merely incidental' mean?" gets all the attention but it's the jurisdictional foot faults that will get you every time.
New Byrd bath results: Senate Judiciary and Budget Ds successfully argue that the ballroom provision violates the third prong of the Byrd rule — having matter outside of the Judiciary Committee’s jurisdiction. This is fixable, but only if Rs *severely* curtail the money’s flexibility.
I've genuinely contemplated using season 1 or 3 (on the Big Dig and the New England fishing industry, respectively) as the basis for a semester-long policy process class. (no shade towards season 2, on the Massachusetts state lottery; everyone should listen to that one too!)
Political scientists, if you haven’t listened to @iancoss.bsky.social podcasts, you’re missing out. www.bostonglobe.com/2026/04/17/a...
Can also highly recommend We're Doing the Wiz, especially if a.) you've spent any time in the Pioneer Valley and/or b.) are an ex-theater kid. www.radiotopia.fm/podcasts/wer...
I have been shouting with only moderate degrees of coherence about this very point so you should all read @mattglassman312.bsky.social's cogent written version. The erosion of the division between mandatory and discretionary $$ is, in short, an extremely big deal.
Despite all the ways Trump has sought to aggrandize the spending power, the real institutional changes to appropriations are actually happening in Congress. open.substack.com/pub/mattglas...
New data for the 2024 election and the 119th Congress is available here: www.brookings.edu/articles/vit...
As always, huge thanks to the research assistants, interns, and the excellent @brookings.edu Governance Studies comms team for helping make this happen.
An imperfect solution to something that should never have been a problem. But there's something fitting about the fact that this went up at the hands of AOC employees who simply showed up to do their jobs today, just as the folks it honors did on Jan. 6. www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
First twin-to-twin succession, but not the first sibling-to-sibling one. That happened with the Fitzpatricks in the House in 2016 and JFK-to-Ted Kennedy in the Senate.
AP call: Trever Nehls has won the GOP primary in #TX22, a safely Republican seat. He'll almost certainly become the first person to succeed his twin (Rep. Troy Nehls) in the House of Representatives.
I only know this thanks to the only people other than me crazy enough to read more than 13,000 entries Biographical Directory of the U.S. Congress to figure out, the fine staff at Roll Call rollcall.com/2025/12/31/t...
Per Judge Cobb's order granting the congressional plaintiffs' TRO in the case involving access for oversight of ICE facilities, turns out I was not the only one with questions about the plausibility of the government's claim. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
relevant (genuine, because budget execution is not my area) Q I've been mulling: how likely is it that DHS has actually segregated the OBBBA $ from the discretionary $ such that they can accurately claim facts consistent with the rider not applying (if, indeed, that's the correct legal argument)?
Since @bbkogan.bsky.social solved my longstanding linguistic problem of how to describe when a funding measure expires last fall ("midnight as Saturday begins"), I can now focus all of my pedantic energy on the difference between a lapse in appropriations and a shutdown.
We lost one of our most treasured colleagues in Governance Studies at @brookings.edu, Steve Hess, this past weekend. His work over five decades was wide-ranging and sharp, and he was relentlessly kind, demonstrating care for every member of our team. We will miss him. www.nytimes.com/2026/01/21/u...
The placeholder bill + rule + related discharge petition remains one of the more interesting procedural innovations of last two congresses.
A new placeholder bill (and rule) to be used with a discharge petition in the future, replacing the one they used for the ACA subsidies bill: www.congress.gov/bill/119th-c... www.congress.gov/bill/119th-c...
Given that David Valadao, the only other remaining House Republican to vote for impeachment in 2021, is sitting in one of the seats targeted by California's redistricting efforts, there may be zero such members come 2027.
Rep. Dan Newhouse, one of the last remaining House Republicans who voted to impeach Trump, won't seek re-election www.nbcnews.com/politics/con...
I'd also note that one lesson from 2025 vs. 2017 is that the politics of a narrower (in this case, health-focused) reconciliation bill are potentially trickier than a big (beautiful or otherwise) one. There's just one hill on which you win or lose, not a bunch of different hills you can choose from.
To quote Jeff Young, "just in time!" There is no evidence that a consensus on health reform exists within the Republican caucus — we still don't have a clear picture of what the HSA-based alternative to extending the enhanced subsidies is. (A Bill Cassidy bill? A Rick Scott bill? No one knows!)
I wish I could take credit for the phrase "new heights of flouting" but that came from the team at @theunpopulist.net who gave me the space for this take on the current landscape of congressional vs. executive power over spending. www.theunpopulist.net/p/founders-w...
featuring links to very helpful work by @bbkogan.bsky.social, the excellent folks at @centeronbudget.bsky.social, and @sbagen.bsky.social
If you are a person who judges the quality of a book by how many random historical documents and rabbit holes it involves (and why would you judge a book in any other way?), I can personally attest, based on watching Vanessa write it, that this is the book for you.
Ok but GUYS MY BOOK IS ACTUALLY OUT TODAY YOU CAN GO AND GET A COPY AND READ IT AND EVERYTHING www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/vanes...