Molly Reynolds

Molly Reynolds

@mollyereynolds.bsky.social

Senior Fellow, @brookings.edu. Still not the Senate Parliamentarian.

19.2K followers206 following564 posts

You say the ghost of the chief justice, I say the Thundering Herd.

Emily Thorson@emilythorson.bsky.social

Just took a survey that asked if I would support the institution of "Marshall law" to maintain order during elections. I assume that's when you summon the ghost of John Marshall to straighten things out?? Proofread your instruments, people!

"As time goes on, this will all pass away into memory, into a story with a beginning and a middle and finally an end. And that transition from the real into fable will bring its own kind of comfort and pain... I am only humbled: to be here, to be alive." www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/wel...

mcsweeneys.netWelcoming Remarks Made at a Literary Reading, 9/25/01For 24 years now, we’ve wondered what might be appropriate on this day, and we can never think of anything more appropriate than this piece, which John Hodgm...

Can you say "jurisdictional foot faults" eight times fast?

Bobby Kogan@bbkogan.bsky.social

Republicans learned about jurisdictional issues the hard way with the ballroom, so they split SAVE among 8 committees, and gave themselves flexibility just in case. $65 billion allowed, but as I say I think they’re targeting $20 billion.

"Getting as far as to get disqualified from the ballot by an election official" definitely still counts as "running" for the purposes of my "Are you required to run for Senate at some point if you live in Alaska and are named Dan Sullivan?" line of inquiry, for the record.

Seung Min Kim@seungminkim1.bsky.social

!! JUNEAU, Alaska (AP) — US Senate candidate with same name as incumbent Sen. Dan Sullivan ineligible for Alaska ballot, election official rules.

Add in former Anchorage mayor Dan A. Sullivan's short-lived 2016 run and one has to ask: are you *required* to run for Senate at some point if you live in Alaska and are named Dan Sullivan?

Manu Raju@mkraju.bsky.social

New — Sullivan v. Sullivan How Dan S. Sullivan, the senator, sees his new GOP challenger — Dan J. Sullivan — as a major threat that could siphon away votes and boost Mary Peltola in critical #aksen Accuses him of being a Dem plant Dems say they had NO involvement J speaks:

"discharge petitions successfully forcing action" is to the 119th congress as "suspension bills aren't just for post offices any more" was to the 118th.

Jonathan Bernstein@jonathanbernstein.bsky.social

To be fair, Hill journalists were raised on "discharge petition, a procedure that never works in the real world" and they're suddenly living in a very different world. Can't emphasize how much *this never happens* in the modern House. It just doesn't.

My own personal favorite Barney Frank quote: "The key to understanding deal making in Congress is to remember that the ankle bone is connected to the shoulder bone. Anything can be the basis of a deal...In Congress, the jurisdiction is universal."

"What in the world does 'merely incidental' mean?" gets all the attention but it's the jurisdictional foot faults that will get you every time.

Bobby Kogan@bbkogan.bsky.social

New Byrd bath results: Senate Judiciary and Budget Ds successfully argue that the ballroom provision violates the third prong of the Byrd rule — having matter outside of the Judiciary Committee’s jurisdiction. This is fixable, but only if Rs *severely* curtail the money’s flexibility.

I've genuinely contemplated using season 1 or 3 (on the Big Dig and the New England fishing industry, respectively) as the basis for a semester-long policy process class. (no shade towards season 2, on the Massachusetts state lottery; everyone should listen to that one too!)

Debbie Schildkraut@debbiejsr.bsky.social

Political scientists, if you haven’t listened to @iancoss.bsky.social podcasts, you’re missing out. www.bostonglobe.com/2026/04/17/a...

I have been shouting with only moderate degrees of coherence about this very point so you should all read @mattglassman312.bsky.social's cogent written version. The erosion of the division between mandatory and discretionary $$ is, in short, an extremely big deal.

Matt Glassman@mattglassman312.bsky.social

Despite all the ways Trump has sought to aggrandize the spending power, the real institutional changes to appropriations are actually happening in Congress. open.substack.com/pub/mattglas...

If hours staring at lists of members of Congress is good for anything, it's that it allows me to remind you of this: Tony Gonzales: GOP congressman from Texas, resigning now Anthony Gonzalez: *different* Republican congressman, served from Ohio until 2023

If you are a person who wrote me a very polite email at any point in the last year asking when new Vital Statistics on Congress data was coming (you know who you are), today is your lucky day!

I assume everyone paying attention to the Senate's current extended debate experience has something they're watching out for. For me, it's whether anyone does something as funny as when Booker talked about how mad he is about the giant picture of Mark Kelly at Newark Airport.

An imperfect solution to something that should never have been a problem. But there's something fitting about the fact that this went up at the hands of AOC employees who simply showed up to do their jobs today, just as the folks it honors did on Jan. 6. www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...

washingtonpost.comLong-delayed Jan. 6 plaque honoring police quietly erected overnight at CapitolThe memorial honoring officers who defended the Capitol was required by law to be installed by March 2023.

First twin-to-twin succession, but not the first sibling-to-sibling one. That happened with the Fitzpatricks in the House in 2016 and JFK-to-Ted Kennedy in the Senate.

Nathaniel Rakich@baseballot.bsky.social

AP call: Trever Nehls has won the GOP primary in #TX22, a safely Republican seat. He'll almost certainly become the first person to succeed his twin (Rep. Troy Nehls) in the House of Representatives.

View full thread

For all the reasons you are thinking of (and maybe some you're not), this has been a HARD year for many people who live in Washington. That's making the decision to gut the parts of the Post (metro, sports) that cover the region as a place that people *live* extra hard to take.

Per Judge Cobb's order granting the congressional plaintiffs' TRO in the case involving access for oversight of ICE facilities, turns out I was not the only one with questions about the plausibility of the government's claim. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

Molly Reynolds@mollyereynolds.bsky.social

relevant (genuine, because budget execution is not my area) Q I've been mulling: how likely is it that DHS has actually segregated the OBBBA $ from the discretionary $ such that they can accurately claim facts consistent with the rider not applying (if, indeed, that's the correct legal argument)?

The placeholder bill + rule + related discharge petition remains one of the more interesting procedural innovations of last two congresses.

ringwiss@ringwiss.bsky.social

A new placeholder bill (and rule) to be used with a discharge petition in the future, replacing the one they used for the ACA subsidies bill: www.congress.gov/bill/119th-c... www.congress.gov/bill/119th-c...

Five years ago today, many people simply woke up on January 6, 2021 and went to work in and around the Capitol to serve their country in ways big and small, only to be met with violence. Their stories are many, and they are still with me.

Given that David Valadao, the only other remaining House Republican to vote for impeachment in 2021, is sitting in one of the seats targeted by California's redistricting efforts, there may be zero such members come 2027.

Sahil Kapur@sahilkapur.bsky.social

Rep. Dan Newhouse, one of the last remaining House Republicans who voted to impeach Trump, won't seek re-election www.nbcnews.com/politics/con...

View full thread

The Gottheimer ACA discharge petition has, at its root, HR 185, the Responsible Legislating Act. This is the *third* separate discharge petition this year to have that catchall bill as its core underlying vehicle.

It’s also that members now expect that they might need a discharge effort as an action forcing mechanism to the point that they introduce placeholder bills with very broad jurisdictions that just sit out there, waiting to become the target of a future discharge effort.

I'd also note that one lesson from 2025 vs. 2017 is that the politics of a narrower (in this case, health-focused) reconciliation bill are potentially trickier than a big (beautiful or otherwise) one. There's just one hill on which you win or lose, not a bunch of different hills you can choose from.

Adrianna McIntyre@adrianna.bsky.social

To quote Jeff Young, "just in time!" There is no evidence that a consensus on health reform exists within the Republican caucus — we still don't have a clear picture of what the HSA-based alternative to extending the enhanced subsidies is. (A Bill Cassidy bill? A Rick Scott bill? No one knows!)

I wish I could take credit for the phrase "new heights of flouting" but that came from the team at @theunpopulist.net who gave me the space for this take on the current landscape of congressional vs. executive power over spending. www.theunpopulist.net/p/founders-w...

theunpopulist.netFounders Would Be Horrified by Congress's Surrender of its Power of the Purse to POTUSThe shutdown is testimony to how a subservient legislature makes governance dysfunctional

If you are a person who judges the quality of a book by how many random historical documents and rabbit holes it involves (and why would you judge a book in any other way?), I can personally attest, based on watching Vanessa write it, that this is the book for you.

Vanessa Williamson@vanessawilliamson.bsky.social

Ok but GUYS MY BOOK IS ACTUALLY OUT TODAY YOU CAN GO AND GET A COPY AND READ IT AND EVERYTHING www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/vanes...