Matt Reece

Matt Reece

@mreece.bsky.social

physicist, obsessed with axions. Boston resident. never had a twitter or a mastodon, but here I am, inexplicably.

648 followers391 following281 posts

Matt Reece reposted

We are now at 8 months of delay on NASA ROSES-2026 and in to a new US government fiscal year. There is still no update beyond "unknown" about the impacted programs. Yet again, USA: Require that Congress ensure NASA operate as it has ordered. And Jared Isaacman should not be NASA Administrator.

Michael Busch@michael-w-busch.bsky.social

NASA conventionally releases its "Research Opportunities in Space and Earth Sciences" in mid-February of each year. This announces dozens of grant programs that fund hundreds of science projects. Last year, it was delayed by 5 months. This year, it has been delayed by 7 months so far.

MA voting: no on 3 is particularly important, and I’m a bit worried it will go the wrong way. I agree with this entire list. (I think 6 should probably be a ‘no‘, but I don’t think it passing would be a catastrophe.)

Jonathan Cohn @jonathancohn.bsky.social

MA has a historic number of ballot questions. Here's a handy guide for the 9 statewide ballot questions this year.

Remember when NASA used to post a big annual call for proposals in many research areas, on a regular schedule? I wonder if that will ever happen again.

Maybe I was oblivious to other ways it affected me, but the only time I remember feeling out of place in an academic career path as a first-generation college student was the first time I went to a winter conference that paused every afternoon for people to ski (I never learned how).

On the other hand, I've been genuinely surprised by not just how many professors I know have parents who are professors, but even how many have parents who are professors at the same institution!

And then there's the implausibly large fraction of my faculty colleagues who were Harvard undergraduates. I think this has a real impact, e.g., resistance to changing curricula, policies, and traditions that were important to them as 20-year-olds, thirty or forty years ago.

Matt Reece reposted

This gets at something that’s been bugging me about the discourse around AI/N-S/Tao, etc. A lot of people are converting to what’s effectively a Romantic Author vision where they sound like Captain Kirk talking about how computers can never Love, except about Originality, Judgment, or Understanding.

Ben Recht@beenwrekt.bsky.social

Here’s my first attempt to grapple with AI companies’ conquest of mathematics and our new mathematical condition.

View full thread

Granted, there are new emails from deans about AI initiatives pretty much every day. I may be overlooking something. But if the much-discussed $2.5k/month access is real, I’m guessing it’s not widely used because it’s not at all clear how one would access it.

Maybe in the sense that I could “request” a pony, but: is there a policy of granting such a request? Harvard offers a $50/month Claude Premium subscription that offers “approximately 5x the usage of a Max 5x account,” according to one Harvard IT webpage.

Dear train nerds of YouTube: please learn to pronounce "Fuxing" approximately correctly. Signed, the parents of a boy who really wants to watch videos about fast trains.

Boggling that Harvard invited all faculty and postdocs to attend a "masterclass" on how to use AI for academic writing, run by a guy with only a handful of publications but an extensive YouTube record of his wacky ideas about fractals, Buddha, and Jungian psychiatry.

This semester I keep asking myself "why are there 20 quantum field theory textbooks and yet not a single book presents the subject in the way I want to teach it?" and of course it's because 20 other people have asked that question before.

I have to remember this so I don't get tempted to write another book that will satisfy me but leave other people asking "why are there 21 quantum field theory textbooks and yet none of them present the subject in the way I want to teach it?"

One of my best footnotes: main text said “In some sense this is the frame that is maximally far from Einstein frame, but it is a very useful one; we can refer to it as the keinstein frame“, footnote read “Leaving no stone unturned in the pursuit of bad physics puns.” (In a 2015 paper with Wei Xue)

Kenny Pearce@kennypearce.bsky.social

Academics, share your best footnote! Here's mine.

Matt Reece reposted

With Nick Rodd, Tracy Slatyer, & Linda Xu: possible tension with LZ and higgsinos arxiv.org/abs/2609.04175 If the LZ event is from a thermal higgsino, you would also expect events in the high-energy sideband, but LZ reports none. The collaboration can definitively check this with their acceptance.

arxiv.orgConfronting the Higgsino Interpretation of the LZ Event with the High-Energy SidebandThe LZ experiment has reported a single 248 keV nuclear recoil event in their $2.84$ ton-yr exposure on a xenon target. The absence of lower nuclear recoil events is naturally explained by inelastical...

Matt Reece reposted

Replying to @mreece.bsky.social

To me, it seems plausible that the uncertainty in the high-speed tail leaves room to fit LZ while pushing delta above their bound. There is a definite tension, though. Escaping their bound requires appealing to very uncertain dark matter astrophysics.

Matt Reece reposted

Replying to @mreece.bsky.social

I should follow up my thread from yesterday because of this paper that appeared tonight from Maxim Pospelov and Hari Ramani. They derive a new bound on higgsino dark matter from particles being captured in the Sun through the same inelastic scattering process we proposed at LZ.

arxiv.orgStrong Constraints on Higgsino Dark Matter from Solar CaptureHiggsino dark matter remains one of the most convincing dark matter candidates. It can exist in a ``quasi-Dirac" regime, when the splitting between two Majorana components is on the order of $O(\rm fe...

The LZ dark matter experiment announced today that they observed a single nuclear recoil event at 250 keV. This is not what "vanilla" dark matter does, but it is exactly what you might expect inelastic dark matter to do. Our optimistic take (having known about the signal for days): 1/3

arxiv.orgHiggsino Above the Sea of FogHiggsino dark matter is a classic, but still viable, weakly-interacting massive particle (WIMP) scenario that could point to supersymmetry, a new spacetime symmetry of nature. It is a simple realizati...
View full thread

We pointed out in our paper that the best fit for LZ is strongly dependent on the high-speed tail of the dark matter velocity distribution. A recent model incorporating effects of the Large Magellanic Cloud pushes the best-fit delta close to 500 keV (still in the range Pospelov and Ramani rule out).

To me, it seems plausible that the uncertainty in the high-speed tail leaves room to fit LZ while pushing delta above their bound. There is a definite tension, though. Escaping their bound requires appealing to very uncertain dark matter astrophysics.

The LZ dark matter experiment announced today that they observed a single nuclear recoil event at 250 keV. This is not what "vanilla" dark matter does, but it is exactly what you might expect inelastic dark matter to do. Our optimistic take (having known about the signal for days): 1/3

arxiv.orgHiggsino Above the Sea of FogHiggsino dark matter is a classic, but still viable, weakly-interacting massive particle (WIMP) scenario that could point to supersymmetry, a new spacetime symmetry of nature. It is a simple realizati...
View full thread

I should follow up my thread from yesterday because of this paper that appeared tonight from Maxim Pospelov and Hari Ramani. They derive a new bound on higgsino dark matter from particles being captured in the Sun through the same inelastic scattering process we proposed at LZ.

arxiv.orgStrong Constraints on Higgsino Dark Matter from Solar CaptureHiggsino dark matter remains one of the most convincing dark matter candidates. It can exist in a ``quasi-Dirac" regime, when the splitting between two Majorana components is on the order of $O(\rm fe...

The particles annihilate in the Sun, producing neutrinos, which the IceCube telescope could see but hasn't. They argue that this rules out higgsino mass splittings below 566 keV, and say this strongly rules out higgsinos as an explanation of LZ which prefers a 340-360 keV splitting.

The LZ dark matter experiment announced today that they observed a single nuclear recoil event at 250 keV. This is not what "vanilla" dark matter does, but it is exactly what you might expect inelastic dark matter to do. Our optimistic take (having known about the signal for days): 1/3

arxiv.orgHiggsino Above the Sea of FogHiggsino dark matter is a classic, but still viable, weakly-interacting massive particle (WIMP) scenario that could point to supersymmetry, a new spacetime symmetry of nature. It is a simple realizati...

It's a higgsino. The inelastic splitting points to gauginos at the 1-10 PeV scale. The 1-loop higgsino mass correction points to the heavy Higgs doublet not being above the PeV scale, so it's not split SUSY. Gauge coupling unification works with a 1 TeV higgsino and other SUSY at PeV. 2/3

They have more data to analyze. The one event could be an upward fluctuation, so even no events in the extra data doesn't mean this one isn't real. We need more experiments to weigh in. Fermi-LAT may have seen hints already in gamma rays. This could be the first sign of very exciting things to come.

Matt Reece reposted

Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope NASA launch went well! A month or so for it to settle to L2 and then commissioning, but another great space science launch!! Ahhhh!!!

I love the urgent inquiries my three-year-old comes up with to try to delay bedtime. Tonight's gem: "I don't know if Brisbane has water taxis."

“Faculty lounge” discourse is odd to me because, as far as I’m aware, no department I’ve been in has ever had one. There is a (university-wide) Faculty Club, which mostly serves as a place to take interviewees for superficially nice but mediocre meals that are easy to bill to the department. 1/

I gather the Faculty Club was more of an actual faculty hangout in the 1980s or before. Steven Weinberg famously ate lunch there regularly and always ordered the horse steak. (He continued to hold court in a similar way in Texas for many years, but as far as I know without the horse option.) 2/

I got a text telling me Maura Healey endorsed Nick Collins for state Senate, which is supposed to make me want to vote for him but somehow just lowers my already low opinion of both of them.

Matt Reece reposted

A theme here is that if a person inside city government intervenes on behalf of a restaurant losing parking spots or a random driver getting a parking ticket, that's seen as constituent services. If another government insider works on behalf of keeping people alive, that's seen as advocacy.

StreetsblogMASS@mass.streetsblog.org

A public records request reveals how @mayorwu.boston.gov's election-year "review" of transportation projects created a duplicate layer of authority inside City Hall that fomented confusion and stalled urgent safety initiatives: mass.streetsblog.org/2026/07/22/f...

Today's talk from Gina Rameika at the Department of Energy at the APS DPF meeting made it clear that the US is completely abandoning any leadership, or even meaningful investment, in experimental particle physics. It's a complete disaster.

In 2015-ish, an official pre-tenure review from my department told me to do "a major breakthrough," so I can attest that telling a human this doesn't work at all. Luckily, as everyone reminds me, Harvard's tenure standards declined precipitously around the time I was hired, so I didn't lose my job.

mr. TIM@timkellogg.me

the Dinitz-Garg-Goemans conjecture, a graph theory problem that’s gone unsolved for 30 years, was solved with this prompt

Not for the first time I forgot the Red Line was shutting down, took the Orange Line downtown instead of the 1 bus to Harvard, and was confronted with the fact that the Red Line is somehow the only functional transit link from downtown to Cambridge.

Matt Reece reposted

Given the age range on bsky there must be a *lot* of us who keep having to stop and puzzle out that our feed isn't talking about the United States Mutant Ninja Turtles.

Matt Reece reposted

Donald Trump came one vote away from getting the Supreme Court to say that the 14th Amendment does not guarantee birthright citizenship for the children of undocumented and temporary immigrants, a view held only by fringe far-right nativists until VERY recently. This is shocking. I am stunned.

5-4 on reading plain English. This court must be destroyed.

Chris Geidner@chrisgeidner.bsky.social

BREAKING: The Supreme Court holds that the Fourteenth Amendment protects birthright citizenship, blocking Donald Trump's executive order to end it. Roberts has the opinion for the court, which is 5-4 on the constitutional question and 6-3 on whether federal law protects birthright citizenship.

Matt Reece reposted

Boston needs to recoup the damage massive passenger cars/trucks cause, both in deaths and road wear, by adding a weight component to our city car tax @wutrain.bsky.social @ruthzee.bsky.social @clrhenrysantana.bsky.social @edflynnforboston.bsky.social @enriquepepen.bsky.social

The War on Cars@thewaroncars.bsky.social

"The report calls for hood height caps of 85 cm (33.5 inches), width limits of 192 cm (75.6 inches), taxes tied to vehicle dimensions, parking fees based on size, and regulatory incentives reserved for smaller EVs measuring less than 4.2 meters (165.4 inches) long."