Magic Data Science

Magic Data Science

@mtgds.bsky.social

Doing math with Magic; doing Magic with math. (Chromatic Lantern; Julie Dillon)

3.1K followers94 following2.4K posts

I've been listening to @justingary.bsky.social's podcast for awhile now, and was pleasantly surprised to see that this week's episode featured a guest -- and a game -- that you may be familiar with*: justingarydesign.substack.com/p/mark-rosew... A must-listen if you're interested in game design.

justingarydesign.substack.comMark Rosewater โ€” Designing for Emotion, Embracing Complexity, and 28 Years of Iteration (#103)Think Like A Game Designer Podcast

๐Ÿ“ฏI am pleased to announce the winner of the Lorwyn Eclipsed #P0P1 Challenge: ๐ŸŽ‡ @formersquid ๐ŸŽ† Going deep on BG, and hitting on the second-best Eclipsed creature (Kithkin), proved to be the keys to victory!

View full thread

๐Ÿ“ฏI am pleased to announce the winner of the Lorwyn Eclipsed #P0P1 Challenge: ๐ŸŽ‡ @formersquid ๐ŸŽ† Going deep on BG, and hitting on the second-best Eclipsed creature (Kithkin), proved to be the keys to victory!

@formersquid, with 458.6 points, can now proudly display this trophy text: ๐–๐ข๐ง๐ง๐ž๐ซ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐„๐‚๐‹ #๐๐ŸŽ๐๐Ÿ ๐‚๐ก๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ž๐ง๐ ๐ž๐Ÿ† No matter what happens, you will always be the winner of the ECL P0P1 Challenge, and no one can take that away from you.

#calledshots for the future The Hobbit set: RW draft archetype will be Dwarf Typal, or at least, heavily Dwarf-centric, maybe with a connection to treasure (tho that's more likely RG) The return of common Legends, at least to fit in some of the many lesser Dwarves

~ โ‰  โ‰ˆ I'm open to using the ~ if you're texting or in a hurry, but on an earnings report, I'd probably take the time to figure out how to write the โ‰ˆ. Also, some wild keming choices here

Magic Data Science reposted

Here is where ECL lands on the #PrinceVPauper ternary plot: decidedly _not_ Pauper. The rares and uncommons are relatively stronger than the commons, to a greater extent than pretty much any recent set. At common, look for good removal, friendly creature types, and... good luck!

Magic Data Science@mtgds.bsky.social

Here's a new visualization I'm trying out -- representing the #PrinceVPauper distribution of recent Limited formats. The axes are unitless, but essentially represent the relative win rates of cards, by rarity. The left-to-right dimension maps onto the common โ†” rare...

Here is where ECL lands on the #PrinceVPauper ternary plot: decidedly _not_ Pauper. The rares and uncommons are relatively stronger than the commons, to a greater extent than pretty much any recent set. At common, look for good removal, friendly creature types, and... good luck!

Magic Data Science@mtgds.bsky.social

Here's a new visualization I'm trying out -- representing the #PrinceVPauper distribution of recent Limited formats. The axes are unitless, but essentially represent the relative win rates of cards, by rarity. The left-to-right dimension maps onto the common โ†” rare...

Magic Data Science reposted

Some time ago, I came up with a method of measuring the "openness" of a card in Limited, which can summarize up to describing a particular format. One of the more interesting things I found was how relatively "on-rails" Bloomburrow was, with its 10 typal archetypes. You can...

Some time ago, I came up with a method of measuring the "openness" of a card in Limited, which can summarize up to describing a particular format. One of the more interesting things I found was how relatively "on-rails" Bloomburrow was, with its 10 typal archetypes. You can...

Some time ago, I came up with a method of measuring the "openness" of a card in Limited, which can summarize up to describing a particular format. One of the more interesting things I found was how relatively "on-rails" Bloomburrow was, with its 10 typal archetypes. You can...

View full thread

5) The least Open cards -- the ones that are most narrowly drafted/played -- are mostly finely-targeted Typal synergy cards, many of which explicitly say the name of a creature type. This is very Bloomburresque.

Some time ago, I came up with a method of measuring the "openness" of a card in Limited, which can summarize up to describing a particular format. One of the more interesting things I found was how relatively "on-rails" Bloomburrow was, with its 10 typal archetypes. You can...

View full thread

3) Contrast those with the Typal hybrid "signposts", which are drafted and played much more like gold cards than hybrid. In the graph ^^^^, you can see the distinction between these two groups of hybrid commons -- the gluey Changelings are way at the top of the distribution.

Some time ago, I came up with a method of measuring the "openness" of a card in Limited, which can summarize up to describing a particular format. One of the more interesting things I found was how relatively "on-rails" Bloomburrow was, with its 10 typal archetypes. You can...

View full thread

...as the graph shows, it also has the wide/low distribution characteristic of a fairly on-rails format. Here are some observations. 1) The most Open cards are, as usual, the colorless lands and artifacts, although even within these cards there are some archetype leanings.

2) The gluey hybrid Changelings are, as you might expect, pretty high-Openness. The "theoretical maximum" for these cards is a 7, which would be the 7 color-touching pairs playing the card equally frequently, and several of these are close, at 6+

Some time ago, I came up with a method of measuring the "openness" of a card in Limited, which can summarize up to describing a particular format. One of the more interesting things I found was how relatively "on-rails" Bloomburrow was, with its 10 typal archetypes. You can...

Someday they'll post a job that requires 2+ years of graph-making and Limited-format-predicting experience.

(S)Cary ๐ŸŽƒ@acry.bsky.social

There's a Magic Game Designer position up. Requires 2+ years competitive experience, not remote, exactly what it says on the tin: careers.hasbro.com/careers/job/...

Clearly Alara, and specifically, Bant

maro254.bsky.social@maro254.bsky.social

Someone on my blog asked what plane has the best pizza. One of the planes I chose was Ravnica, so another person asked which guild made the best pizza. It was โ€œAnother Day of R&D Productivity Lostโ€ (for fans of my old โ€œTales from the Pitโ€ comic). #WotCStaff

Magic Data Science reposted

Here is a plot of GIHWR by rank within color, for commons and uncommons in ECL, per @17lands.bsky.social Among commons, it's G and then everyone else, although R and B have a higher top-end before falling off, while U and W are a little flatter. Among uncommons, ...

...the lines are pretty well tangled up, which is often a sign of good color balance, though there is a slight edge to green. Just going off of this graph, I'd say -- look for Elves, but none of the 5 primary typal mechanics are guaranteed to fail, if built reasonably.

Magic Data Science reposted

With all of the Treefolk and -1/-1 counters running around ECL, folks have been talking about how high-toughness the creatures in this set are. But, are they? ๐Ÿค” I went to make this graph, expecting ECL to be an obvious outlier, and it's... just not! As you can see... ๐Ÿ‘‡

With all of the Treefolk and -1/-1 counters running around ECL, folks have been talking about how high-toughness the creatures in this set are. But, are they? ๐Ÿค” I went to make this graph, expecting ECL to be an obvious outlier, and it's... just not! As you can see... ๐Ÿ‘‡

View full thread

This holds up if you look at all cards, not just commons & uncommons. I just thought this was interesting, and a little counterintuitive. Especially after you add all of the -1/-1 counters, ECL is surprisingly low-toughness! (It's also interesting to see just how big...

With all of the Treefolk and -1/-1 counters running around ECL, folks have been talking about how high-toughness the creatures in this set are. But, are they? ๐Ÿค” I went to make this graph, expecting ECL to be an obvious outlier, and it's... just not! As you can see... ๐Ÿ‘‡

...all but 7 of these sets has higher average toughness than power, but the biggest toughness outliers are all old sets: Alpha, Alliances, & Antiquities. But even in the last year, Final Fantasy and The Last Airbender are substantially more tough-leaning than Lorwyn Eclipsed.

Magic Data Science reposted

Several folks on @maro254.bsky.social's Blogatog reported that players at prerelease were confused by the official 5-pair archetype guide, hesitating to explore the other five pairs, despite some support for them. So I made an unofficial guide to those secondary archetypes!

Magic Data Science@mtgds.bsky.social

ECL is another 5-archetype reference, but this one has an unusual twist: It includes three "allied" and two "enemy" pairs! This structure is mirrored in the #2CUDS as well as a common hybrid cycle, half of which are explicitly typal, half of which are Changelings.

Several folks on @maro254.bsky.social's Blogatog reported that players at prerelease were confused by the official 5-pair archetype guide, hesitating to explore the other five pairs, despite some support for them. So I made an unofficial guide to those secondary archetypes!

Magic Data Science@mtgds.bsky.social

ECL is another 5-archetype reference, but this one has an unusual twist: It includes three "allied" and two "enemy" pairs! This structure is mirrored in the #2CUDS as well as a common hybrid cycle, half of which are explicitly typal, half of which are Changelings.

I know this would have been more useful about a week ago, but ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ Maybe this will help someone, and if not -- I love these Archetype Guides, and wanted to dabble in the genre anyway ๐Ÿ˜„