Nick White

Nick White

@nickwhite.bsky.social

Supramolecular chemist at the Australian National University. www.nwhitegroup.com. British-born, NZ-raised, newly Australian. Boulderer and trail runner.

505 followers196 following52 posts

Michael McGuirk and I wrote an tutorial review on supramolecular frameworks (hydrogen bonds, halogen bonds, chalcogen bonds etc) where we try to get everyone to agree on some common definitions for things. Might be a long shot! Hopefully useful for new students. pubs.rsc.org/en/content/a...

pubs.rsc.orgDefining, designing and determining the structure of supramolecular frameworksSupramolecular frameworks, ordered porous networks assembled by noncovalent interactions, are a broad class of functional materials with emergent combinations of properties arising from the relatively...

We have a new paper out with Annie Colebatch: we metalate 6+ hydrazone cages to give M3-cage metallocages with coordinatively unsaturated metal ions. Et solubilising groups give expected 3-fold symmetric metallocages. OMe or OPr give funky low-symmetry cages tinyurl.com/4ehppaex.

onlinelibrary.wiley.comLow Symmetry Cage Complexes Formed by Metalation of Symmetric Hexa‐Cationic Organic CagesThreefold symmetric hexa-cationic hydrazone cages coordinate a range of transition metal ions upon deprotonation. When the cage contains ethyl solubilising groups the expected threefold symmetric cag...

Very good thread on the silliness of impact factors.

Valentin Rodionov@arbitraryeffect.bsky.social

This is an excellent illustration of how useless the "Impact Factor" metric is. The most influential multidisciplinary chem journals are JACS and Angewandte. They did not make the list. In this short ad hoc 🧵 I will analyze in real time what made the list and why. I have a bad feeling about this.

2024 journal impact factors are out, and I had a bit of a play around comparing the numbers with 2019 IFs. Bit of a thread to follow, but general trend seems to be most journal IFs are trending downward but JACS/Angew and big “less-selective” journals buck the trend.

View full thread

Is this because they’re publishing more of the better papers? Or just focusing on highly cited areas? Or that people are getting lazy with their citing and just concentrating on JACS/Angew? Possibly all of the above?

2024 journal impact factors are out, and I had a bit of a play around comparing the numbers with 2019 IFs. Bit of a thread to follow, but general trend seems to be most journal IFs are trending downward but JACS/Angew and big “less-selective” journals buck the trend.

View full thread

Pleasingly this year, there are lots of papers that have been cited a few times, which seems more sustainable! (Each paper only contributes to IFs for the year it is published and the following year).

2024 journal impact factors are out, and I had a bit of a play around comparing the numbers with 2019 IFs. Bit of a thread to follow, but general trend seems to be most journal IFs are trending downward but JACS/Angew and big “less-selective” journals buck the trend.

View full thread

On a personal note, Supramol. Chem. has increased from 1.3 --> 2.6 in this time. This probably says something about the vagaries of IFs though: a couple of years ago, it was even higher (3.3), in that case largely based on one very highly-cited paper.

2024 journal impact factors are out, and I had a bit of a play around comparing the numbers with 2019 IFs. Bit of a thread to follow, but general trend seems to be most journal IFs are trending downward but JACS/Angew and big “less-selective” journals buck the trend.

View full thread

The other journals that have improved a lot are RSC Adv., ACS Omega and Molecules. This means that the ACS and RSC “less-selective” journals now have higher IFs than e.g. JOC, Dalton, OBC. This isn’t just that they’re publishing more reviews.

My suspicion is that this is because these journals are publishing a lot of highly/rapidly citing materials chemistry, but I don’t really know. It could be the effects of being open access too, or that there is a lot of useful stuff in these journals.

2024 journal impact factors are out, and I had a bit of a play around comparing the numbers with 2019 IFs. Bit of a thread to follow, but general trend seems to be most journal IFs are trending downward but JACS/Angew and big “less-selective” journals buck the trend.

IFs are clearly silly and game-able, and I don’t think they have that much of a correlation with “quality,” but it’s interesting (to me) to see how they’re changing over time. This chart compares 2019 and 2024 IFs: things above the black line have increased, below have decreased.

JACS, Angew and Nat. Comm. are notable improvers, while what I would consider the next tier down from JACS/Angew (Chem. Sci., Chem. Comm. CEJ) have decreased quite a lot. That means the gap between JACS/Angew and the rest is pretty huge.

Nick White reposted

We have a 3-year postdoc position available, starting in October, to work on molecular capsules for catalysis. Click on the link below to apply! 👇 Happy to have informal chats about the post - send me an email. Application deadline 6 July. edzz.fa.em3.oraclecloud.com/hcmUI/Candid... #chemsky

edzz.fa.em3.oraclecloud.comResearch Fellow - School of Chemistry - 105878 - Grade 7To create and contribute to the creation of knowledge by undertaking a specified range of activities within an established research programme and/or specific research project.

Does anyone tech-savvy know if there's a browser extension or something that get journals to just show me the normal pdf rather than their annoying epdfs? Manually deleting the e from epdf in the web address and reloading is getting tedious. #chemsky

Bit belated (thanks COVID), but thanks to everyone who came to Supramol25 in Canberra last week. Some great plenaries and prize talks, and most impressively of the ~ 30 talks over 2 days, not a single one was in 4:3 format! I think this might be a career highlight.

1 pm Saturday: invitation to review a revision of a manuscript I've previously reviewed 6 pm Sunday: "I recently invited you to review this manuscript and have yet to receive your response" I get that journals want things signed off before Christmas, but this seems a bit much!

We report porous halogen bonded frameworks, assembled using NaCl ion pair templation. Not stable to evacuation but stable to solvent exchange and iodine vapour. Congrats to first/corresponding author Jordan who designed the system and visiting Edinburgh MChem student Callum who first made them.

onlinelibrary.wiley.comPorous Halogen‐Bonded Frameworks Assembled through Hetero‐polytopic Ion Pair TemplationA tetratopic halogen-bond donor with a discrete cation binding site was designed and synthesised. When crystallised with NaCl, a 3D framework is formed where the charge-balancing cation is sequestere...

You are up to date.