Science & Technology Studies | History of Sci/Tech/Med | Qualitative Metascience | Medical Humanities.
Associate Prof at UW Madison.
🇨🇦 living in the 🇺🇸 married to a 🇩🇪.
Can medical humanities coursework build compassionate care skills? New research from our faculty says yes. A multimodal elective on suffering & social justice showed meaningful improvements across all outcomes measured. Read more in WMJ. #MedicalHumanities#MedEdwmjonline.org/125no1/babal/
new blog post at Journal of Trial & Error in series co-sponsored by @nanobubbles.bsky.social by Candida Sánchez Burmester, Maha Said, Martin Bush, myself & @nicolecnelson.bsky.social on "Field-Specific Barriers to Performing Replications" 1/x
blog.trialanderror.org/cultures-of-...
#STS#HSTM#HPS folks who are studying AI in use in scientific contexts...please check out this call! You can apply to get feedback on your work in progress or get 💵 to provide feedback on others' work. I will be workshopping some of my own stuff on cloud labs. datasociety.net/announcement...
We're hiring in history of science at UW Madison! TT Assistant Professorship with a focus on water. Joint appointment between the History and Integrated Liberal Studies depts, and part of a university-wide hiring cluster on earth/sustainability science. jobs.wisc.edu/jobs/profess...#STS#HSMT
We are co-sponsoring this event - make sure to attend!
Saving Hearts and Killing Rats: Karl Paul Link and the Discovery of Warfarin
Friends of the Libraries 2025 Annual Schewe Lecture
Thursday, September 25, 2025 | 5:00 – 7:00 PM
Steenbock Library
uwmadison.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_...
Job Opening at the Chair of Philosophy and History of Science and Technology at TUM! Research Fellow for 3 years (renewable). Preferably philosopher w interest in plant, crop & agricultural research (& their history and social studies)
All details: www.sts.sot.tum.de/en/sts/arbei...#philsci#sts
I had the pleasure of talking with @lucileveissier.bsky.social at #metascience2025 about what metascience is, how reproducibility problems rose to public attention, and more!
Suite à la conférence #metascience2025, mon interview de l'historienne des sciences @nicolecnelson.bsky.social à lire dans @themeta.news !
#VeilleESR#metascience
#OpenScience lobbyists, skeptics and everything in between: consider coming to Munich in May 2026 (gorgeous time to visit..) to discuss the future of Open Research!
FOR2026 is open for submissions: opensciencestudies.eu/for-2026-con... pls help spread the word 🙏 #philsci#sts#methods#policy 🧪
Seeing lots in my feed today referencing the @cos.io statement and @theguardian.com op-ed on gold standard science, and IMHO most people are worrying about the wrong thing -- it's not *closing down* the flow of science into policy that worries me, it's a radical *opening up* of data for reanalysis
Calling the Trump EO "fool's gold" and the like may feel like a pithy way of maintaining a preserve of "genuine" open science advocacy, but this boundary making is exactly the kind of exclusionary practice that has galvanized dissident scientists and motivated them to keep showing up.
You can read more here about this history and my take (along with my excellent students @bennettmcintosh.com and Kelsey Ichikawa) on why adjudicating between competing analyses is likely to be difficult, time consuming work: osf.io/preprints/me...
Seeing lots in my feed today referencing the @cos.io statement and @theguardian.com op-ed on gold standard science, and IMHO most people are worrying about the wrong thing -- it's not *closing down* the flow of science into policy that worries me, it's a radical *opening up* of data for reanalysis
*That* is what conservative advocacy for open science is about... enabling the production of "deregulatory science", as Becky Mansfield calls it, rather than enabling the exclusion of existing science. The end goal (deregulation) may be the same, but the mechanism is importantly different.
The difference is important because access to data is increasing with or without the specific laws/policies that Republicans have championed. Adversarial reanalysis is likely to become more of a feature of our scientific/political landscape, and we don't have great tools to deal with it.
Seeing lots in my feed today referencing the @cos.io statement and @theguardian.com op-ed on gold standard science, and IMHO most people are worrying about the wrong thing -- it's not *closing down* the flow of science into policy that worries me, it's a radical *opening up* of data for reanalysis
For 30 some years, Republicans have recognized that they are under-gunned when it comes to regulatory science disputes because they don't have access to the large scale, longitudinal studies with which good science is made. And so they've been trying to pry open that can to get access to that data.
4S is scoping out the level interest in creating a mutual support network for scholars of all stages w/ HSS and SHOT for “Cultivating Community Among International Scholars in Uncertain Times.”
Please fill in the following survey (takes <5 mins): forms.gle/FD63QKGjXNJk...
Call for collaborators!
We are launching the Replicability Project: Health Behavior (RPHB) to replicate a sample of findings relevant to public health, epidemiology, health policy, and behavioral science.
Teams receive funding for conducting replication studies.
Details: www.cos.io/rphb
It's that season once again 🍂 ☀️ ❄️ 🌱 so please spread the word: Science, Technology, & Human Values are pleased to announce that we are taking proposals for Special Issues of the journal 📬 ⏰ The call closes 21 June 2025 - and you can find details in the form: forms.gle/6uYdQim9J1z5...
The thing that I've always most enjoyed using social media for is posting photos of all my little projects, so in an effort to wean myself off of meta I'll start posting here. A 1:14 scale model of my sewing room, in progress!
Don't have a team of potential editors already in mind, but would like to be part of the team that leads @estsjournal.bsky.social ? Send me an email! I am collecting up names and hold a Zoom call in a few weeks to introduce folks to each other and answer questions.
The call is now officially out for a new editorial team for
@estsjournal.bsky.social ! Please share widely, and email me to chat if you are interested in leading @4sweb.bsky.social's diamond OA journal. I am happy to help you put together your proposal and team! #STS4sonline.org/news_manager...
✨ #callforpapers ✨ - First STS India Network Conference in Delhi, 15-17 December 2025 - including tracks on histories of STS, digital STS, feminist STS and environmental STS: stsin.org/stsinc25/#cfp#sts@ushar.bsky.social
Expression of Interest:
Next editorial team for our diamond open access journal—
Engaging Science, Technology, and Society (ESTS)
More on the call here: www.4sonline.org/engaging_sci...
And for enquiries contact our Editor-in-Chief: estsjournal.org/index.php/es...
The call is now officially out for a new editorial team for
@estsjournal.bsky.social ! Please share widely, and email me to chat if you are interested in leading @4sweb.bsky.social's diamond OA journal. I am happy to help you put together your proposal and team! #STS4sonline.org/news_manager...
Saw that Outlook has a new pride color theme... I immediately tried it out, and it is disappointingly subtle. I really want to submit a support ticket that just says PRIDE THEME NOT GAY ENOUGH.
Deadline next Monday 01.04 for the Science Studies Symposium! Still time to apply. Event will be in Helsinki 6-7 June 2024 and focus on scientific contributions. Besides keynotes by Noortje Marres & Teun Zuiderent-Jerak we have also confirmed Minna Ruckenstein! #stswww.helsinki.fi/en/conferenc...
Join us for EASST-4S 2024 in Amsterdam to discuss: *Scientific cultures in conflict and transition: Studying reform in action* | @alexrushforth.bsky.social & @nicolecnelson.bsky.social
Session description behind link & below. We welcome papers from all across the #metasci and #sts communities. 1/
New publication day! Happy to announce that our paper on irreproducibility experiences and mental health is out. We found that irreproducibility is a nearly universal experience for biomedical science grads, and that ~25% had emotional responses to it that that interfered with their work/lives.
And for the PIs in the room: please pay extra attention to the wellbeing of your students when they're in the midst of failing to replicate something. It's a risky moment in the student life course, especially for undergrads and grads in their first few years.
P.S., thanks for the shout out over on Twitter, @biolumijeffence.bsky.social, and for sharing your own experience... it was an inspiration for our work!
New publication day! Happy to announce that our paper on irreproducibility experiences and mental health is out. We found that irreproducibility is a nearly universal experience for biomedical science grads, and that ~25% had emotional responses to it that that interfered with their work/lives.
I would love to see more work in the #metascience community that focuses on the impact of failure to replicate on scientists, and not just the science!
🚨 It is time to announce (*drumroll*) that we are holding an STS School next year, June 2024 in Singapore. 4 packed days of seminars, workshops, keynotes and fieldtrips. See sthvschool.org for details and the call for applications! 🚨
All I've learned from reading a lot and studying on science is that these boundaries have always been fuzzy and that we don't have access to a complete picture of what science is or can/will/should be. I recommend reading history of science to every scientist. It'll shake your beliefs to its core.
Trying to start off the new academic year right by moving away from the bird site, so I'm getting myself set up on Mastodon and trying this out as well. Here's a little about me:
I'm an STS scholar, but I also spend time in the history of sci/tech/med, metascience, and medical humanities.
Beginning scientists and beginning doctors are both struggling a lot with what can be known and especially with what they themselves are capable of doing. I love helping them explore those uncertainties using tools from the humanities.
So there's me! I tended to be a lurker on the bird site and I'm not sure whether this account will be more post-y or lurk-y. But if we share some interests, please give me a follow so I can follow you back and at least lurk on you!
Trying to start off the new academic year right by moving away from the bird site, so I'm getting myself set up on Mastodon and trying this out as well. Here's a little about me:
I'm an STS scholar, but I also spend time in the history of sci/tech/med, metascience, and medical humanities.
So I'm kinda a meta-metascientist, but I also consider myself part of the metascience community, where you'll find me flying the flag for qualitative research. IMHO metascience needs more of a critical mass of folks with deep qual expertise, and I'm happy to lead the charge on that front.
Since I study enculturation into scientific communities, I tend to spend a lot of time studying trainees, and that (plus my teaching in the med school) has put me much more into contact with the medical humanities community in the past few years.
Trying to start off the new academic year right by moving away from the bird site, so I'm getting myself set up on Mastodon and trying this out as well. Here's a little about me:
I'm an STS scholar, but I also spend time in the history of sci/tech/med, metascience, and medical humanities.
Around the time I was finishing that up, I got interested in the "reproducibility crisis." It seemed like a sea change in thinking about foundational scientific tools, like NHST. What you could or could not know from a significance test was suddenly up for debate in a big way.
The book that I'm writing now on the replication crisis is one part historical and one part ethnographic: What were the conditions of possibility for this conversation/reform movement to emerge, and what's it like to do scientific work in this changing/changed world?
Trying to start off the new academic year right by moving away from the bird site, so I'm getting myself set up on Mastodon and trying this out as well. Here's a little about me:
I'm an STS scholar, but I also spend time in the history of sci/tech/med, metascience, and medical humanities.
I looked mouse models of psychiatric disorders for my first book because there was no shortage of disagreement about those questions. Some people though mouse models were awesome for understanding genetics, others thought they were basically useless if you wanted to understand humans.
I studied how scientists got socialized into belief systems about how to use mouse models to study them, and communicated those views to others. It was super fun: I met a guy who used the same brand of shampoo for his whole PhD and a woman who walked out on a date who mansplained genetics to her.
Trying to start off the new academic year right by moving away from the bird site, so I'm getting myself set up on Mastodon and trying this out as well. Here's a little about me:
I'm an STS scholar, but I also spend time in the history of sci/tech/med, metascience, and medical humanities.
My core research question is: how do scientists think about the knowledge production capacities of the tools they use? That is, how much do they trust the data a method generates? What kinds of limitations do they think it has? What do they think it should absolutely not be used for?