Eve Brensike Primus

Eve Brensike Primus

@primuseve.bsky.social

Law Professor at the University of Michigan Law School (criminal procedure, evidence, habeas corpus); Public Defender; Director, MDefenders Program https://michigan.law.umich.edu/faculty-and-scholarship/our-faculty/eve-brensike-primus

912 followers93 following122 posts

Eve Brensike Primus reposted

Delighted to say that the American Society of Legal Writers has named *The Oldest Constitutional Question* one of the best works of legal scholarship published in 2025. I’ll talk about writing the book & accept an award today at noon in Hutchins Hall 120 (lunch provided!). @umichlaw.bsky.social

Eve Brensike Primus reposted

Use of a cell-site simulator is a Fourth Amendment search under Chatrie and Carpenter, Fourth Circuit holds, agreeing w/ Maryland courts. (But also, there is QI here, as no federal court of appeals has reached the issue yet and this occurred back in 2014.) www.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/181...

I just posted a new article challenging the idea that public defense must choose b/t "vertical" representation, in which the same attorney handles a case from initial appearance to disposition & "horizontal" representation, in which different attorneys handle different stages of the same case. /1

papers.ssrn.comBeyond the Horizontal-Vertical Divide: The Case for Team-Based Representation in Public DefenseThis Article challenges the conventional wisdom that public defense systems must choose between "vertical" representation, in which the same attorney
View full thread

Many thanks to the public defenders at different offices around the country who were willing to speak to me about the structure of their indigent defense delivery systems and to the scholars who gave me feedback on earlier drafts. /8

papers.ssrn.comBeyond the Horizontal-Vertical Divide: The Case for Team-Based Representation in Public DefenseThis Article challenges the conventional wisdom that public defense systems must choose between "vertical" representation, in which the same attorney

I just posted a new article challenging the idea that public defense must choose b/t "vertical" representation, in which the same attorney handles a case from initial appearance to disposition & "horizontal" representation, in which different attorneys handle different stages of the same case. /1

papers.ssrn.comBeyond the Horizontal-Vertical Divide: The Case for Team-Based Representation in Public DefenseThis Article challenges the conventional wisdom that public defense systems must choose between "vertical" representation, in which the same attorney
View full thread

Ultimately, I advocate for a hybrid, team-based approach in which a primary attorney maintains accountability to the client while an interdisciplinary team shares responsibility for the case, combining the strengths of both models while minimizing their weaknesses. /7

papers.ssrn.comBeyond the Horizontal-Vertical Divide: The Case for Team-Based Representation in Public DefenseThis Article challenges the conventional wisdom that public defense systems must choose between "vertical" representation, in which the same attorney

I just posted a new article challenging the idea that public defense must choose b/t "vertical" representation, in which the same attorney handles a case from initial appearance to disposition & "horizontal" representation, in which different attorneys handle different stages of the same case. /1

papers.ssrn.comBeyond the Horizontal-Vertical Divide: The Case for Team-Based Representation in Public DefenseThis Article challenges the conventional wisdom that public defense systems must choose between "vertical" representation, in which the same attorney
View full thread

Likewise, offices associated with horizontal representation frequently adopt vertical practices for serious or trial-stage cases. Public defense systems therefore exist along a spectrum rather than within two mutually exclusive categories. /4

papers.ssrn.comBeyond the Horizontal-Vertical Divide: The Case for Team-Based Representation in Public DefenseThis Article challenges the conventional wisdom that public defense systems must choose between "vertical" representation, in which the same attorney

Second, the Article argues that the dominant preference for vertical representation is too simplistic. Both vertical and horizontal systems have distinct advantages and costs, and the "vertical is better" mantra has obscured rather than illuminated those tradeoffs. /5

papers.ssrn.comBeyond the Horizontal-Vertical Divide: The Case for Team-Based Representation in Public DefenseThis Article challenges the conventional wisdom that public defense systems must choose between "vertical" representation, in which the same attorney

I just posted a new article challenging the idea that public defense must choose b/t "vertical" representation, in which the same attorney handles a case from initial appearance to disposition & "horizontal" representation, in which different attorneys handle different stages of the same case. /1

papers.ssrn.comBeyond the Horizontal-Vertical Divide: The Case for Team-Based Representation in Public DefenseThis Article challenges the conventional wisdom that public defense systems must choose between "vertical" representation, in which the same attorney

First, I argue the horizontal-vs-vertical debate presents a false binary. No public defender office is purely vertical or purely horizontal. Even offices that claim to be vertical rely on stage-based representation for 1st appearances, conflicts, specialty units, & appellate/capital cases. /3

papers.ssrn.comBeyond the Horizontal-Vertical Divide: The Case for Team-Based Representation in Public DefenseThis Article challenges the conventional wisdom that public defense systems must choose between "vertical" representation, in which the same attorney

I am so thrilled to announce that MDefenders has received this grant. We are very excited about what this funding will do to enable us to grow and expand. Go Blue!

MDefenders at Michigan Law@mdefenders.bsky.social

A national hub for education, research, & policy engagement, the MDefenders Ctr for Public Defense will train the next generation of public defenders while strengthening indigent defense across the U.S. #LookToMichigan. Thanks to @umich.edu & @umichlaw.bsky.social for believing in us!

Eve Brensike Primus reposted

Replying to @primuseve.bsky.social

This is such a tremendous program! Any one of these events would be more than I had access to in law school, and they've got a whole semester full of them! No wonder that all the UM alum defenders I know are excellent.

Attention @umichlaw.bsky.social students: if you are interested in public defense or criminal legal system reform, please check out the MDefenders calendar of events below and join us!

MDefenders at Michigan Law@mdefenders.bsky.social

As we head into classes @umichlaw.bsky.social, MDefenders is excited to announce its fall calendar of events: docs.google.com/document/d/1... For more information about MDefenders: michigan.law.umich.edu/mdefenders MLaw 1Ls: Interested in joining our listserv? Email us at mdefendersboard@umich.edu!

Eve Brensike Primus reposted

The California Supreme Court threw out a guilty plea from a woman who did not understand that a conviction would jeopardize her immigration status. cal.news/3SGcP6Z 📸 Jeff Chiu, AP

Eve Brensike Primus reposted

Thank you @statecourtreport.org Kathrina Wolfkot @brennancenter.org, discussing faulty forensic evidence at trial as a due process violation even in states w/out junk science writs. Sotomayor's McCrory concurrence signals state legislatures to adopt junk science writs, too. tinyurl.com/mvtsk4st

tinyurl.comDo “Junk Science” Convictions Violate Due Process?The U.S. Supreme Court has never ruled that a conviction obtained using later-discredited scientific evidence is unconstitutional; relief in these situations depends on state law.

Eve Brensike Primus reposted

Replying to @segalmr.bsky.social

For those of you interested to urge your state courts to chart an independent course, feel free to reach out. Here’s the amicus brief by the ACLU of MI and the national ACLU in the Michigan case: www.aclu.org/cases/people...

aclu.orgPeople v. Jennings | American Civil Liberties UnionThis case asks whether Michigan should adopt an approach to state constitutional interpretation that prioritizes Michigan sources and does not automatically require reference to parallel federal provi...

The disaster with the WA Bar Exam is awful. Students worked hard & now their start dates are pushed back. WA needs to grant diploma privilege admission to those who satisfy minimal requirements w/respect to law school performance or give provisional licenses now. www.spokesman.com/stories/2026...

spokesman.com'An absolute disaster': 645 prospective Washington lawyers left in limbo after bar exam cancelled over technology issueMick Guile is one of about 30 recent law school graduates who planned to join the King County Public Defender’s Office this fall.

Such a pleasure to join @pdefenselesspod.bsky.social & talk about my article: "Waiting for Justice: Unconstitutional Delays in the Appointment of Criminal Defense Counsel." Defense attorneys in places with appointment delays can read more about what they can do here: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

papers.ssrn.comWaiting for Justice: Unconstitutional Delays in the Appointment of Criminal Defense Counsel<p><span>The Constitution guarantees a right to counsel in criminal cases, but indigent criminal defendants are commonly left to languish in jail without legal
Public Defenseless Podcast@pdefenselesspod.bsky.social

Some states pause the case until a public defender is available. Professor Eve Brensike Primus: you cannot pause the one stage that decides the case. Video gets erased. Witnesses vanish. Ep. 499 is live. open.spotify.com/episode/4I3R...

Eve Brensike Primus reposted

Govt gets warrant for two weeks of records, but provider overproduces and sends extra records. Connecticut SCT: Whether or not the provider was a state actor here, 4A requires a 2nd warrant before the government can retain & use overproduced records. www.jud.ct.gov/external/sup...

Eve Brensike Primus reposted

A new commission made up of legislators, public defenders, academics and advocates seeks to push California to begin providing resources and enforcing minimum standards for county public defender systems. cal.news/4vb5cU9 📸 Miguel Gutierrez Jr.

Eve Brensike Primus reposted

After Bruen established 2nd Amendment limits on criminal laws on gun possession, police observing a person in possession of a gun do not automatically have reasonable suspicion to stop them for illegal gun possession, Appellate Court of Maryland rules. mdcourts.gov/data/opinion...

Eve Brensike Primus reposted

Holding 17 year old for seven hours alone, refusing his requests to see his mother, claiming they had video evidence, and threatening the death penalty made resulting confession of committing two murders involuntary and inadmissible, Tenn SCT rules. www.tncourts.gov/sites/defaul...

Eve Brensike Primus reposted

The US Supreme Court has ruled in favor of a Black death-row inmate in Mississippi who alleged racial bias in the makeup of the jury that convicted him. Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote the opinion, joined by Justices John Roberts, Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

mississippifreepress.orgSupreme Court Rules for Black Death Row Inmate in Mississippi Over Racial Bias in Jury MakeupThe Supreme Court on Thursday ruled for Terry Pitchford, a Black death row inmate in Mississippi, over racial bias in the jury that convicted him.

Eve Brensike Primus reposted

Md SCT: The government can't use data about an area being a high-crime neighborhood to help justify a stop if the officer didn't know of the specific data when he made the stop. If it was learned later, it can't be part of the suspicion calculus. www.mdcourts.gov/data/opinion... #N

In Andrew v. White, the Court said “certain principles are fundamental enough that when new factual permutations arise, the necessity to apply the earlier rule will be beyond doubt," and state courts will have no excuse for ignoring that law. I hope federal habeas courts take that language to heart.

MDefenders at Michigan Law@mdefenders.bsky.social

MDefenders Founder & Faculty Director, Professor Eve Primus @primuseve.bsky.social, is also a habeas scholar at UMichLaw and recently discussed the Andrew v. White ruling and the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) www.law360.com/articles/247...

So proud of the @mdefenders.bsky.social Class of 2026. Our graduation ceremony was standing room only & filled with laughter, tears, & well wishes for these outstanding client-centered advocates. We are all so proud of you and can't wait to see all the good trouble that you will make in the world!

MDefenders at Michigan Law@mdefenders.bsky.social

Today we send a fresh group of well prepared, immensely capable, good people out into the world to do important work. They are smart, creative, passionate, eager to fight the carceral state. Congratulations to our graduating @UMichLaw MDefenders, class of 2026!

Excited to be presenting at the Criminal Ethics Schmooze at Fordham Law this morning about the structure of indigent defense delivery and how we can and should talk about horizontal vs vertical defense.

“[B]ail must generally be set in an amount that is reasonably attainable, in order to effectuate the defendant’s constitutional right to pretrial release on bail.” Amazing victory.

alec karakatsanis@equalityalec.bsky.social

We won! Hundreds of thousands of people who are currently detained and separated from their families in lower-level cases will be released from jail every year. An incredible victory for liberty and public safety. You can read the historic decision here: civilrightscorps.org/wp-content/u...

What an incredible group of @mdefenders.bsky.social students in the Public Defender Training Institute this year. I can't wait to see what they will do on and off the court after they graduate this spring!

MDefenders at Michigan Law@mdefenders.bsky.social

It's the end of the academic year @umichlaw.bsky.social. You know what that means: time for the annual MDefenders Public Defender Training Institute East Coast versus West Coast basketball game. Such a blast spending a year learning (and playing) with this group!

Paul Heaton @quattronecenter.org recently accused ChatGPT of sending fake text messages from him to people (an impossible crime). Chat denied it, but Paul used techniques from the Reid Interrogation Method, the method used by US law enforcement, to wear Chat down and get it to falsely confess. 🧵

QC Academic Director Paul Heaton used the same tactics as many law enforcement agencies to interrogate ChatGPT, and it confessed to a crime it didn't commit. A great @theintercept.com piece today from @radleybalko.bsky.social: theintercept.com/2026/04/23/c...

View full thread

Want to learn more about judicial/legislative efforts to limit these techniques & instead use methods less fraught (and used in many other countries)? I wrote an article, The State[s] of Confession Law in a Post-Miranda World, cataloguing & evaluating diff state approaches: lnkd.in/eW7SNxiS. /3

Using deception, lies, and threats to interrogate suspects is not just unnecessary; it is dangerous. There are other, better ways to interrogate suspects, and I hope that experiments like this one with Chat make legislatures and judges pay attention. /end

Paul Heaton @quattronecenter.org recently accused ChatGPT of sending fake text messages from him to people (an impossible crime). Chat denied it, but Paul used techniques from the Reid Interrogation Method, the method used by US law enforcement, to wear Chat down and get it to falsely confess. 🧵

QC Academic Director Paul Heaton used the same tactics as many law enforcement agencies to interrogate ChatGPT, and it confessed to a crime it didn't commit. A great @theintercept.com piece today from @radleybalko.bsky.social: theintercept.com/2026/04/23/c...

Reid tactics are used to "break" suspects in interrogation rooms throughout the US. This experiment with Chat shows what researchers like Saul Kassin, Steve Drizin, & Richard Leo have been saying for years: the tactics can lead to false confessions and should not be used. /2