Earl Campbell

Earl Campbell

@quantumearl.bsky.social

Arch mage of quantumancy @ riverlane / Prof @ Sheffield uni / quantum error correction and algorithms / poster of posts / reader of sci-fi / player of games / father of daughters / cronic typer of typoes & requester of edit buttons

831 followers212 following219 posts

Pinned

You say Tera, I say Mega!

Riverlane@riverlane.com

✨What would you do with a MegaQuOp?✨ 🧙‍♂️A new #arXiv paper from @ucl.ac.uk & our @quantumearl.bsky.social introduces the ultimate magic trick "Mitigated Magic Dilution" to unlock Clifford circuits with limited qubit numbers: arxiv.org/abs/2505.10513 TL;DR: www.riverlane.com/news/a-magic... #QEC 🧪

Earl Campbell reposted

Earl Campbell reposted

🎉 It's publication day! 🎉 Congrats to the team for a new @prxquantum.bsky.social paper where their 'ghost protocol' speeds up QEC cycle speeds 10x for AMO qubits 👻 journals.aps.org/prxquantum/a... 👏 Mark Turner, @quantumearl.bsky.social, Ophelia Crawford, Neil Gillespie, and Joan Camps

journals.aps.orgScalable Decoding Protocols for Fast Transversal Logic in the Surface CodeA scalable decoding protocol enables fast logic with AMO qubits.
Riverlane@riverlane.com

👻 We ain’t afraid of no ghost! A new #arXiv paper from our team proposes the 'ghost protocol’ to enable AMO qubits to catch up with superconducting qubits, which lag in #QEC cycle speeds. It addresses the challenges of scalable #QuantumErrorCorrection in the context of fast transversal logic👇🧪

Earl Campbell reposted

Registration is now open for QEC26, to be held this June in sunny Santa Barbara, CA! See the registration page at qec-conference.org for a link. Also, the deadline for submissions is next Friday. Make sure to get those in and spread the word to friends and collaborators!

Coming out of social media hibernation to ask: Are you interested in hosting a future QEC conf? We are looking for detailed bids for QEC27 over the next month (provisional deadline 21st November). For more info: DM or email me. QEC26 will be in Santa Barbara

I also posted this on X and for the first time got more reposted here than on X! I try not to use X but this seemed too important to limit to the bluesky bubble, but maybe X is actually the smaller bubble now.

Roadmaps! Useful guides for the wider community, or overly simplistic and prone to exaggeration (sometimes, but not always!) ? thequantuminsider.com/2025/05/16/q... I ask because we are reviewing our roadmap: www.riverlane.com/press-releas... What would you like to know, or do you ignore these?

thequantuminsider.comQuantum Computing Roadmaps: A Look at The Maps And Predictions of Major Quantum PlayersAs of early 2025, major players are shaping the future with detailed roadmaps and predictions from their expert.

Mama etna has calmed down in time for our flight home to be undisturbed. Surreal to see videos of scary fast pyroclastic flows only a few days after we had a tour up there! (Check the news if you don’t know what I am talking about)

Google quantum symposium is fantastic. But many of the results presented are not on the arXiv yet, and we’ve been asked to not post about them on social media. So, sorry, no live update folks. But I can say cool stuff is coming!

Nice catalog of talks here.

Dom Williamson@domwilliamson.bsky.social

Talks from the recent YITP workshop “Logical Gates for Encoded Qubits” are up! Thanks again to the organizers for putting on a fantastic workshop. My talk about fault-tolerant logical measurement: www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0G0...

Arrived in LA. Stuck in traffic on way to hotel, of course. Good flights. Read some papers with a longer update coming soon. Movie: the Dracula remake. Very much liked. Only seen bits of the original but could tell there were a lot of references. Very dark and gritty. 5 stars.

There are also a bunch of other tricks in there like optimization of electron orbital basis to minimize a crucial parameter Lambda, also clearly a smart thing to do. Of course, the devil is in the details, and the work is brilliantly executed.

What is the main contribution of Gunther et al?  They explore the more LCU based approach (leaving behind diamond norms) while also using a “best of both worlds” approach.   This is clearly the right thing to do and was a combination that I never got to exploring.

And over the years, I have been excited to see lots of papers and conference posters on randomized approaches, from people including Eisert, Weibe, Guzik, and others.  I read some of these, but many are still in que (for another plane journey!) and I am sure I missed some gems.

So it was lovely to read Gunther et al and return to the topic.  Firstly, there are a bunch of connections, especially between my papers 1 and 3 above, which have never been very well explained the literature.

And after a tour de force of Mathematics from Kianna, we had want I considered a very beautiful result with improved resource estimates. Though the resource estimates were still not competitive except under some extreme assumptions discussed there.

Errors were measured with respect to the diamond norm.  In the appendices, I attempted a resource analysis of phase estimation, but I was lacking the tools / knowledge of the literature, and It wasn’t great!

2 - It was clear even then to me, that qdrift was suboptimal and that some kind of hybrid deterministic and randomized method would allow a “best of both” approach. At Sheffield, with Yingkai and David, we made some progress with the SparSto protocol.

This was a pleasure to read for me as it picked off from where I left my thinking on randomized approaches, ultimately leading to some decent resource estimates for this approach applied to hydrogen chains and FeMoco.

“Business mode” Going to economist quantum event in London. 1 day before look at website and surprised to see 1000+ expected attendees, with photos of previous events showing a high density of suits. 5 mins b4 leaving house recheck email and see “dress code: business attire” Slight panic…