Raduan Al-Shedivat

Raduan Al-Shedivat

@raduan.xyz

✳︎ software entrepreneur ✳︎ enhancing human productivity via summate.io ✳︎ sharing what i learn on ai, bootstrapped business & personal growth ✳︎ ai eng @ databricks

1.1K followers37 following524 posts

Using GPT-5 in @windsurf after wave 12, and it's noticeably better agent than what they had previously. Using high reasoning, it's slow, but instruction following is next level. Integration with DeepWiki also feels like an unfair advantage at this point. Very well done.

If only people would think in decades: Then they would care more about proof of work... Than any cluely-level short term marketing stunt to get views on some post. Stop posting rage baits on this timeline and start building something great.

From @zeddotdev blogpost by @conradirwin. My .02 cents: This will always be like that - humans in the drivers seat, but LLMs remove a ton of inefficency and help you translate inputs into outputs. Which means you will have flatter org structure and just faster pace of work.

Gergely's keeps bashing Cognition, though their product keeps improving week over week, and many competitors copy what they've built into @DevinAI. Might be saying more about the audience of Gergely (devs from big tech, who haven't used Devin), than about the Devin itself.

Early testing of gpt5: - amazing at following instructions - follows everything I told it in rules, similar to gpt4.1. - I let it debug issues on it's own - I still can't see using it instead of sonnet/opus for long-running high level use cases. - It's amazing in Cursor

not gonna lie, every time I see em-dash now questioning whether it's ai written or not not that it's a bad thing - I will still read the whole thing, if it's from good source. but would double-check it in case it's some hallucinated text. so not a bad side effect.

Found a new use-case: Vibe Reviewing. Been already using superwhisper / monologue by @every for a while. Now that I review more PRs than ever created by agents, realized that providing voice review is way better than me writing some things.

what if you had a separate inbox, but just for newsletters? > filter out emails by sender > read them / preview links that they sent > get AI summaries / key takeaways for each email > see stats and block useless senders in one click shipped and available at summate[.]io

Good take from @balajis. Doubling down on your prompt and building better systems for verification is what you need to be spending your time on. Improving inputs. Verifying outputs.