Rob de Vries reposted
One of the fundamental presumptions that needs to be challenged here is that peer review should be a gatekeeping exercise used to exclude science🧪 from the scholarly record. Dissemination and peer review need to be decoupled. Check out a one new model : publish-review-curate.org
LLMs, asked to "peer" review 200 papers published this year in top science and medicine journals, either rejected or recommended major revisions 76% of the time. Telling the LLMs the paper was a revision paper made them much more generous. arxiv.org/abs/2610.31414