Pinned
Gal Sapir
the "lack of speaker" being the strongest signal imo. the same way my eyes just skip over 75% of codex/cc output is this feeling, the same feeling you get when you interact with a customer service bot. the sense you are reading a person's thoughts is important in reading (signal of actual 'effort'l
Modelspeak may be a little worse than the typical cliché, in fact, because it makes the reader wonder whether there is any speaker — and that profoundly undermines communication.
An interesting read! I love reading stuff on Terence's site even if it's a guest post. terrytao.wordpress.com/2026/10/15/w...
engineering is science for impatient people is great! i think also these days CS is science for impatient scientists as well
This week's #PaperILike is "Artificial Intelligence: An Empirical Science" (Herbert Simon, AIJ 1995). Timely as new results make us revisit foundational questions. And hot takes: engineering is "science for people who are impatient." PDF: ic.unicamp.br/~wainer/cursos/2s2006/epistemico/simon-ia.pdf
this is a *great* explanation! thanks @ed3d.net
Everyone on this blue sky wants to know: what the h*ck is a Jev? Why are nerds excited about this? Reader, I wish I knew. Watcher, I’ll tell you, don’t tell the reader guys. youtube.com/watch?v=HojO... (As usual, obeisance to the algorithm is appreciated. 🫡)
another banger "Dialectical activities ... are valuable because their good can only be discovered from within the activity, as in parenting, art-making, friendship, or research [56]. Scholarly sensemaking is similarly dialectical: researchers develop ... become better researchers by orienteering..."
might be of interest to @lampinen.bsky.social @adamgayoso.bsky.social and others studying model capabilities and biological ML. the LLM prompts, schemas, and synthetic examples are public too.
tabular foundation models showed small gains over ridge. the 14 LLMs showed a jagged frontier across tasks, generally behind models trained on the same inputs. paper: arxiv.org/abs/2609.06080 more on what we found: sparsethought.com/phenobench/
i spent some time with gpt-6 and fable 5.1, then looked at their model cards to see what improved in health. incremental gains, and some questions about the judges wrote about it here - sparsethought.com/2026/09/08/l...
can i ask experienced researchers here to review a cv please? looking for my next adventure (god i hate linkedin talk), more details soon :-) galsapir.com/cv/
can i ask experienced researchers here to review a cv please? looking for my next adventure (god i hate linkedin talk), more details soon :-) galsapir.com/cv/
btw notice the difference, to get to science and health you have to scroll wayyy down (and the improvements are really incremental it seems). Can't wait to test it myself though
I honestly think it's crazy (in a good way) that "scientific research" is front and center for a model release in a frontier lab
something slightly different (i usually don't to personal / wlb/ touch grass / future of work type stuff) - but this is different no agents after 8 pm sparsethought.com/2026/08/19/n...
Gal Sapir reposted
i agree and not sure how to handle it
Every part of this resonates. I've been trying to articulate something similar about "the ground shifting underneath language" or "language being destabilized." And this feels especially uncanny and dizzying when I suspect AI use in personal messages from people I know very well. IDK where it leads.
I love their reports. maybe someday I'll subscribe newsletter.semianalysis.com/p/rl-environ...
www.seangoedecke.com/llms-reward-... that's a origiod take (even if well known, it's phrased nicely)
a refreshing read! shelbyann.substack.com/p/the-sirens-of-data-sales (wrote some thoughts about it as well) - sparsethought.com/2026/08/04/t...
"large software projects have never been limited only by how quickly an individual can produce code. They are limited by how well people can coordinate their understanding of the system they are changing." lucumr.pocoo.org/2026/7/13/th...
recommended reading: "HEARTS: benchmarking LLM reasoning on health time series" some non-intuitive findings, some intuitive ones i'm glad to see thoroughly checked yang-ai-lab.github.io/HEARTS/#home
recommended reading: "HEARTS: benchmarking LLM reasoning on health time series" some non-intuitive findings, some intuitive ones i'm glad to see thoroughly checked yang-ai-lab.github.io/HEARTS/#home