Gal Sapir

Gal Sapir

@sapir.bsky.social

https://sparsethought.com/

89 followers427 following374 posts

the "lack of speaker" being the strongest signal imo. the same way my eyes just skip over 75% of codex/cc output is this feeling, the same feeling you get when you interact with a customer service bot. the sense you are reading a person's thoughts is important in reading (signal of actual 'effort'l

Ted Underwood@tedunderwood.com

Modelspeak may be a little worse than the typical cliché, in fact, because it makes the reader wonder whether there is any speaker — and that profoundly undermines communication.

so natural yet crazy to think that transplanted organs match their "age" (basically methylation patterns++) to recepient's

engineering is science for impatient people is great! i think also these days CS is science for impatient scientists as well

Tom Silver@tomssilver.bsky.social

This week's #PaperILike is "Artificial Intelligence: An Empirical Science" (Herbert Simon, AIJ 1995). Timely as new results make us revisit foundational questions. And hot takes: engineering is "science for people who are impatient." PDF: ic.unicamp.br/~wainer/cursos/2s2006/epistemico/simon-ia.pdf

yeah I dislike this phrasing too. In the "all models are wrong, some are useful" universe, I think it leans less towards "useful" when applied like that

Vladimir Salnikov@v4ldelund.bsky.social

Sorry guys, but "System 1 Decision model" is something on claudish Can we just call it classifier ?

domain-specific harnesses are all the rage (or so it sometimes seems) wrote a bit about my own experience working on one tldr - i think its a pretty effective way to try and 'encode' expert knowledge and save time+cost when working on projects in specific areas models aren't trained on

can i just say that Google calling for clinical trials wasn't on my bingo card in 2026? an interesting and imo smart take (still need to write a bit more about it)

"Trust is not a fixed property of a model and cannot be measured as a benchmark. It is earned incrementally through direct human experience with the AI agent and rigorous scientific analysis of the study results. Only prospective studies can observe this dynamic."

can i just say that Google calling for clinical trials wasn't on my bingo card in 2026? an interesting and imo smart take (still need to write a bit more about it)

"PCPs reported that AMIE shifted consultations “from data gathering to data verification”; patients arrived organized with coherent narratives, enabling more collaborative conversations and shared decision-making." i think this is really a first step

a really nice paper they articulate an important (emerging) gap really well - the gap between 'human comprehension bar' and 'agent execution bar' another important aspect they touch on is how to encode the human judgement that goes into the scientific process? super importance stuff

recommended reading!

Andy Matuschak@andymatuschak.org

I want weirder representations of "readings"—the trace/artifact produced by a reader's interaction with text(s). Here playing with a cut-up "poster-ification". Cumbersome in many ways, but interesting.

View full thread

another banger "Dialectical activities ... are valuable because their good can only be discovered from within the activity, as in parenting, art-making, friendship, or research [56]. Scholarly sensemaking is similarly dialectical: researchers develop ... become better researchers by orienteering..."

recommended reading!

Andy Matuschak@andymatuschak.org

I want weirder representations of "readings"—the trace/artifact produced by a reader's interaction with text(s). Here playing with a cut-up "poster-ification". Cumbersome in many ways, but interesting.

favorite quote so far: "We call our alternative vision reading for transformation: reading augmentation that treats the reader’s transformation as its central design concern." also

sharing my latest work: what can a deeply phenotyped human cohort tell us, and what can today’s AI models do with that information? we built PhenoBench: 90 tasks across 15 clinical domains, using clinical, imaging, molecular, and wearable data from the Human Phenotype Project.

sharing my latest work: what can a deeply phenotyped human cohort tell us, and what can today’s AI models do with that information? we built PhenoBench: 90 tasks across 15 clinical domains, using clinical, imaging, molecular, and wearable data from the Human Phenotype Project.

that's a good take :-)

Ryan Moulton@moultano.bsky.social

There are a few times when I've gone viral for work or a tweet that I was proud of, and it was pretty great. We should try to do that for more people, instead of the reverse.

the most accurate take

Vicki@vickiboykis.com

It’s pretty wild how cleanly the labs have been able to spin basic security incompetence into positive marketing

you know how they (Plutarch) say "the mind is not a vessel to be filled, but a fire to be kindled"? i feel like it describes working with modern llm/harness combos very well

first very preliminary impressions from gpt 6 astra - being very similar to 5.6 on scientific/biology texts ml-ish code kinda like the benchmarks suggested

btw notice the difference, to get to science and health you have to scroll wayyy down (and the improvements are really incremental it seems). Can't wait to test it myself though

Gal Sapir@sapir.bsky.social

I honestly think it's crazy (in a good way) that "scientific research" is front and center for a model release in a frontier lab

i agree and not sure how to handle it

Maria Antoniak@mariaa.bsky.social

Every part of this resonates. I've been trying to articulate something similar about "the ground shifting underneath language" or "language being destabilized." And this feels especially uncanny and dizzying when I suspect AI use in personal messages from people I know very well. IDK where it leads.

more and more I feel like the days resulting in my best work, are the days in which I hold back on "letting agents roam free" and being much more careful and well, full of care

two quotes i liked: "benchmarks that include health often sacrifice realism for breadth." and across imputation & forecasting, LLM strategies are "remarkably simplistic, predominantly defaulting to copy-pasting with noise injection" (!!)

comparing LLMs to SOTA ML on these tasks is lacking and important. that's the "real" baseline: cheap, (mostly) explainable, well accepted acknowledging health evals haven't kept pace with models is, well, also an important statement

non-intuitive bits: 1. reverse correlation between signal frequency and LLM performance. 2. specific areas where LLMs lag more than others (metabolic disorders, sleep). 3. most importantly - the CodeAct vs Biomni/Phylo comparison