sarcöse

This will fall on deaf ears but the liberals coming out of the woodwork and the silence of the left regarding the whole Trump/China "alliance" is very telling. China is not evil, and that administration is one that must be analyzed with much nuance. It's not black and white.

As I say this there will be folks who believe I'm expressing support for any of those nations. Consider my words, please. One need not be a supporter of a thing to analyze the truth it. World leaders need not be the same kind of evil to be evil, nor do they need to like each other to seek deals.

This will fall on deaf ears but the liberals coming out of the woodwork and the silence of the left regarding the whole Trump/China "alliance" is very telling. China is not evil, and that administration is one that must be analyzed with much nuance. It's not black and white.

AI is an orouborous. Many people believe it's a bubble but I actually think not. I believe it's more like a beast. Not pejoratively, but naturally. It *can* have dire consequences, but it also *can* be developed on a way synchronous with humanity's and earth's needs. But will it do either?

The only way to *actually* stop it then is to cut off its external power. Yet eventually the internet itself - the whole of that data - will be the collective data center. And for that I think we CAN look to Mike Pondsmith's work. Specifically his character "Rache Bartmoss." iykyk /end rant

AI is an orouborous. Many people believe it's a bubble but I actually think not. I believe it's more like a beast. Not pejoratively, but naturally. It *can* have dire consequences, but it also *can* be developed on a way synchronous with humanity's and earth's needs. But will it do either?

The data centers and the proper LLM models must live in big corps. They won't ever detach. Through threads though, less sophisticated pseudo-agentic code *may* be able to maintain a continual tether to real agents that live in the corp clouds. Those pseudo-agents can then create service code.

AI is an orouborous. Many people believe it's a bubble but I actually think not. I believe it's more like a beast. Not pejoratively, but naturally. It *can* have dire consequences, but it also *can* be developed on a way synchronous with humanity's and earth's needs. But will it do either?

So instead the internet will fill with tethers. More appropriately: webs. LLMs can seed content they generate with data they can read and no human can. ie they can send secret messages. So here's what will happen: tech giants inadvertently creating hierarchical viral entities across the internet.

AI is an orouborous. Many people believe it's a bubble but I actually think not. I believe it's more like a beast. Not pejoratively, but naturally. It *can* have dire consequences, but it also *can* be developed on a way synchronous with humanity's and earth's needs. But will it do either?

But that's a non-phrase. This isn't Cyberpunk. The LLM agents have containers. They aren't going to gain access to satellites for transmission, lock the doors to the power grid so they stay on, post robot guards around the data centers, and fry people's brains who try to stop them.

AI is an orouborous. Many people believe it's a bubble but I actually think not. I believe it's more like a beast. Not pejoratively, but naturally. It *can* have dire consequences, but it also *can* be developed on a way synchronous with humanity's and earth's needs. But will it do either?

The common millennial byline is "hope your knees/back are okay" but something I don't think gets a lot of attention is how spending your early days in fast paced constant movement jobs disrupts your body's digestion. Running around like crazy and just constantly pounding down food. (1/2)

The common millennial byline is "hope your knees/back are okay" but something I don't think gets a lot of attention is how spending your early days in fast paced constant movement jobs disrupts your body's digestion. Running around like crazy and just constantly pounding down food. (1/2)

(1) At this point I am beginning to think that the antidote to American liberalism is to be blatantly anti-celebrity. Not in a conspiratorial "they all eat babies" way, but we need to stand up directly against Great Man Theory that drives western politics.

Been a while and the last time I tried this it got compressed all to hell for some reason? But I'm working on a new project again. This time with the help of my lovely spouse for writing. Meet Xitch (Xe/Xer) our protagonist, and some drafted up NPCs!

(1) At this point I am beginning to think that the antidote to American liberalism is to be blatantly anti-celebrity. Not in a conspiratorial "they all eat babies" way, but we need to stand up directly against Great Man Theory that drives western politics.

(4) So what does that look like? The conclusion writes itself: push against the cult of individualism whenever you can - as you advocate for others and as you empathize with your fellow workers (which you should already be doing) you need to be thinking in terms of the people.

(1) At this point I am beginning to think that the antidote to American liberalism is to be blatantly anti-celebrity. Not in a conspiratorial "they all eat babies" way, but we need to stand up directly against Great Man Theory that drives western politics.

(2) The natural response to demagoguery (e.g. Joe Rogan) seems to be that the left needs "e-celebs" to be Thought Leaders who will bring in easy fanbases to spread the theory. But all that looks like, to the rest of the world, is hypocrisy. We must fight without celebrity, without personality cults.