Campbell F. Scribner

Campbell F. Scribner

@scribnerumcp.bsky.social

History and Philosophy of Education at UMD. Author of A IS FOR ARSON (2023); SPARE THE ROD (2021); and THE FIGHT FOR LOCAL CONTROL (2016). Caught somewhere between Ivan and Alyosha.

1.3K followers859 following2.9K posts

2/ I was sympathetic with (and grateful for) several of the conclusions, particularly around the need to recognize the complexities of moralizing higher claims in higher education, and the shortcomings of proceduralism and policy.

3/ But disappointed by an apparent reduction of all DEI opposition to “backlash,” not crediting int critiques, which seem bound to be overlooked; and (2) the fallback to proceduarlism (rather than cultural change) to handle moral disagreement, which I see as a vain hope.

Campbell F. Scribner reposted

“¿Dónde está TOTO? (Wo ist TOTO?)” by Carlos “Kopyeson” Talavera (American) – Colored pencil & acrylic on brown paper / 2024 – Experimentally Structured Museum of Art (Lawndale, California) #WomenInArt #Kopyeson #Talavera #ESMoA #art #artText #WizardOfOz #JackPumpkinhead #DorothyGale #Illustration

Campbell F. Scribner reposted

This is my first Bluesky post and I would like to respond to Brendan's critique on my recent paper: "The Effects of Course-Integrated AI Tutoring on Student Performance and Engagement: A Randomized University Trial." (1/2)

Brendan Bartanen@brendanbartanen.bsky.social

“The current study presents findings from, to our knowledge, the first large-scale randomized experiment evaluating the effects of AI tutoring on student learning at a large U.S. public university.” The only problem is the findings are wrong. brendanbartanen.substack.com/p/ai-tutorin...

View full thread

7/ To make this point, Ryen Burris and I use Hannah Arendt’s concept of “natality” and children as the source of radically new perspectives. We open with a Wordsworth quote, but one could also think of Emerson and “childhood as the perpetual messiah.”

View full thread

6/ Phenix was not an ordinary kid, but the argument of the piece is that even FOR ordinary kids historians of childhood cannot take intellectual selfhood or personal epistemology seriously b/c framing childhood as social construction precludes “felt” or freely chosen rationality.

View full thread

3/ The article is about a philosopher named Philip H. Phenix, the subject of my current book project, who seems to have arrived at his philosophical worldview by the age of fourteen (!), by way of neo-Kantian physics and metaphysics.

4/ Basically, Phenix fell in love with science but (for religious reasons) decided that he disagreed with Einstein about issues of absolute space and time. In doing so, he anticipated (and eventually exploited) the work of the mathematician, Hermann Weyl.

Campbell F. Scribner reposted

At a colleague's suggestion, I submitted some of my writing to ChatGPT for feedback. I can confirm that it does not understand the depth of the modern academic's alienation.