smcphail.bsky.social

smcphail.bsky.social

@smcphail.bsky.social

Director of Campaign Finance Litigation at Citizens For Responsibility and Ethics in Washington

109 followers105 following270 posts

smcphail.bsky.social reposted

Trump made far more money in his first year in back in office than he has ever made IN HIS LIFE, and it was completely, undeniably intentional. We showed in a recent report that when Trump became the presumptive GOP nominee in 2024, he began a spree of corporate formation that continues to this day

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com

JD Vance: "I've not seen a single shred of evidence that Donald Trump participates or sanctions in that corruption ... I've not once seen evidence that Donald Trump has enriched himself"

smcphail.bsky.social reposted

BREAKING: We just sued Jared Kushner for unlawfully acting as one of the country's top diplomats without undergoing Senate confirmation or filing financial disclosures. It’s abundantly clear that he should be blocked from performing this outsized role: www.citizensforethics.org/legal-action...

the excuse? "nor do we have authority over ads produced by any third-party PAC that we contribute to in Arizona" Except you do, big donor. You can't just hand off a bag of cash (and claim the 1A right to do so without limit because it funds speech) & then wash your hands of that speech.

Rick Hasen@rickhasen.bsky.social

#ELB: “Airbnb Disavows Anti-Trans Ad From Republican Super PAC It Supported” https://electionlawblog.org/2026/airbnb-disavows-anti-trans-ad-from-republican-super-pac-it-supported/

And if Airbnb didn't control the ads and, it appears, didn't care what the ads it was funding would say - why is it funding a super PAC? If its not to fund ads like this, then what, pray tell, did Airbnb think it was buying with its $$$?

smcphail.bsky.social reposted

COURT WIN: In 2024, we sued on behalf of 2 GA voters over $5 million in spending on Senate races that was routed through multiple groups to hide its source. The FEC had split along partisan lines, with 3 commissioners improperly raising the bar and declining to investigate.

smcphail.bsky.social reposted

Good News: The 9th Circuit upheld an Arizona law created to combat corrupt elections and strengthen the state’s disclosure rules. In 2024, we filed an amicus brief in support of it. State laws can help close federal loopholes and bring real transparency to state elections.

smcphail.bsky.social reposted

BREAKING: In a victory for voters, a federal appeals court upheld Arizona's Prop 211, the landmark voter-approved law that reveals the original sources of dark money election spending. Campaign Legal Center Action represents Voters’ Right to Know in this case.

campaignlegal.orgFederal Court Upholds Landmark Campaign Finance Transparency Law in ArizonaSAN FRANCISCO — Yesterday, in a major victory for Arizonans, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld Proposition 211, also known as the Voters’ Right to Know Act. Approved by 7...

smcphail.bsky.social reposted

NEW: ProPublica revealed that the FBI was circling Sen. Collins over a defense contractor’s donations — until Trump gutted the unit in charge. Collins has since mustered a defense with a series of incorrect and misleading claims.

propublica.orgProPublica Debunks Susan Collins’ Claims About FBI Anti-Corruption ProbeProPublica revealed that the FBI was circling Sen. Collins over a defense contractor’s donations — until President Trump gutted the unit in charge. Collins has since mustered a defense with a series o...

A quid pro quo, or just "access and influence" donors earn? SCOTUS tells us only the former is problematic. But millions in taxpayer funds may have been misallocated, reflecting neither merit nor popular will, but solely a kick back of campaign contributions. Either way, taxpayers get bilked.

“Vigilant enforcement,” SCOTUS just told us this summer, is the best means to prevent wrongdoing. But that ignores the reality – unlike observable and verifiable metrics like contribution limits, quid pro quos aren’t done in the open for people to see.

And if we rely on government agencies for enforcement, they are the same people who may either be corrupted themselves or are serving people that are corrupted. The FBI was apparently waived off this investigation by those in power.

We’re often given a false choice: anonymous political activity or full public disclosure. But large contributions are rarely, if ever, anonymous. Donors want influence (or bribes) for their money, which requires officials to know who they are. The donors are only “anonymous” to the voting public.

The contractor's money went to a super PAC – a group that is supposedly independent of candidates. When SCOTUS (with help of the DC Circuit) unleashed super PACs, they assured us this independence meant there was no significant risk that contributions to super PACs would result in bribes.

But the super PAC was in fact closely associated with Senator Collins and made sure she knew who was donating, even if the public didn't. The donor clearly understood it was important Senator Collins knew they were behind this supposedly low-value contribution.

Must read piece in Pro Publica on the reality of today’s campaign finance system that shows the false promises SCOTUS made that got us here. 🧵https://www.propublica.org/article/fbi-susan-collins-navatek-campaign-donations-investigation

propublica.orgThe FBI Anti-Corruption Squad Was Circling Susan Collins — Until Trump Got in the WayAfter the FBI caught a defense contractor’s CEO making illegal campaign contributions, it sought to launch a sweeping political bribery probe involving Collins and others. Then the second Trump admini...

Pro Publica reports that a military-contractor – someone the law forbids from electioneering—engaged in a multi-million dollar bribery scheme with members of congress in exchange for government contracts. Though counterparties deny involvement, the reporting is still revealing.

smcphail.bsky.social reposted

Since Trump’s pardons, insurrectionists have sought offices from town clerk and school board all the way up to governorships and congressional seats—but voters across the country are overwhelmingly rejecting them. 🧵

smcphail.bsky.social reposted

Conditioning funding based on a recipient’s support or opposition to a particular political candidate or party is a violation of the Hatch Act. The Office of Special Counsel must investigate the Trump admin's "partisan punishment of American citizens."

citizensforethics.orgTrump administration’s politicized federal grant decisions violate the Hatch Act - CREW | Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in WashingtonThe Trump administration’s admitted cancellation of federal grants to states based on their political identity is a Hatch Act violation.

smcphail.bsky.social reposted

Trump became the presumptive GOP nominee on March 12, 2024, and within days, he started creating new companies and slapping his name on products. He hasn't stopped since. The tally now stands at 81 new businesses—36 since taking office (he started two more while I was drafting this report)

citizensforethics.orgTrump incorporated dozens of new companies in lead up to second term—and never stopped - CREW | Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in WashingtonTrump filed a financial disclosure in June revealing he brought in more than $2.2 billion in revenue during 2025. We found that more than a third of that revenue came from dozens of companies Trump ha...

smcphail.bsky.social reposted

One year ago, I started highlighting the growing number of enforcement matters that the FEC cannot resolve until we regain a quorum. Last year, there were 154. Now, it’s doubled to 307. We need a quorum to tackle this backlog and fully achieve the agency’s mission this election.

So Meta is donating $5 million to dark money groups for both the R and D sides of the house and senate. But I've been assured by SCOTUS that donors only contribute to these groups to fund speech they support....

Rick Hasen@rickhasen.bsky.social

#ELB: Quote of the Day https://electionlawblog.org/2026/quote-of-the-day-183/

smcphail.bsky.social reposted

NEW: Trump reported bringing in over $2.2 billion in revenue during 2025. More than a third of that revenue came from dozens of companies Trump had just incorporated months before. The data makes clear Trump’s intention to capitalize on the presidency like *never* before.

smcphail.bsky.social reposted

Massive political spending is an avenue for the sort of undue influence that most American voters view as corrupt. Restoring confidence in government will require major reforms to address the concentration of private wealth and public power.

brennancenter.orgCyclospora Outbreak Shows Why So Many Americans Are Angry About CorruptionFollowing major lobbying and campaign spending from the food industry, an important safety rule has been delayed for years.

smcphail.bsky.social reposted

NEW: Trump's second term has taken corruption to an entirely new level—expanding the ways he can profit from the presidency, reward allies and use the power of his office for personal gain. Here are 10 ways Trump's second term is even more corrupt than his first.

citizensforethics.org10 ways President Trump is more corrupt this term - CREW | Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in WashingtonCrypto schemes, corrupt politicians pardon, foreign deals, funding the ballroom, promoting his properties—Trump's corruption has worsened.

smcphail.bsky.social reposted

But I've been assured that all the court decisions during that time striking down campaign finance laws have been expanding free speech rights (if you're rich enough to afford them of course)?

Jameel Jaffer@jameeljaffer.bsky.social

Most Americans think the freedom of speech is eroding (hard to disagree with that) and, more disturbing still, that it will continue to erode over the next decade.

smcphail.bsky.social reposted

BREAKING: We just sued the Treasury Department for illegally withholding information about who is receiving settlement money from its Judgement Fund. Taxpayers need to know whether Jan. 6ers and Trump allies are getting massive payouts from the federal government.

citizensforethics.orgCREW sues Treasury Department for concealing January 6th settlement details  - CREW | Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in WashingtonThe Treasury Department is illegally concealing who is receiving settlement money from its Judgment Fund, obscuring whether January 6th insurrectionists are receiving payouts.

smcphail.bsky.social reposted

NEW: The Jan. 6 insurrection left American taxpayers with $2.7 billion in costs that were never recovered. Now, convicted Jan. 6 defendants are trying to use the Federal Tort Claims Act to extract substantial and secretive payouts from the government.

citizensforethics.orgJanuary 6ers cost taxpayers $2.7 billion. Now they're seeking secret payouts. - CREW | Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in WashingtonJanuary 6ers could seek negotiations for secretive payouts through the Federal Tort Claims Act should Congress fail to take action.

smcphail.bsky.social reposted

We helped secure a big win for Arizona voters! The Arizona Supreme Court upheld Prop 211, the voter-approved law that reveals the original sources of money spent in elections and protects voters’ right to know who is spending big money to influence their vote. 1/3

campaignlegal.orgMajor Victory for Election Transparency as Arizona Disclosure Law is UpheldIn a huge victory for Arizonans, Campaign Legal Center, our local Arizona partners, and for the fight against dark money in our elections, the Arizona Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of...

smcphail.bsky.social reposted

BREAKING: We filed for a temporary restraining order to block the transfer of $1.8B from the Treasury Dept to Trump's slush fund. Trump can't unilaterally and secretly disburse these taxpayer funds. The court must stop this grift before it's too late. www.citizensforethics.org/news/press-r...

citizensforethics.orgCREW files for restraining order to immediately block Trump’s $1.8 billion slush fund - CREW | Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in WashingtonThe court should issue a temporary restraining order to immediately halt the transfer of $1.776 billion to Trump’s secretive slush fund.

smcphail.bsky.social reposted

BREAKING: We sued the DOJ, Treasury Department and IRS to block the Trump admin from handing out $1.8 billion in taxpayer funds to Trump's allies who claim to be victims of government weaponization. This settlement is one of the single most corrupt acts in American history.

citizensforethics.orgCREW sues to block Trump’s $1.8 billion slush fund - CREW | Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in WashingtonThe Trump administration’s $1.776 billion “anti-weaponization” slush fund is unconstitutional and violates multiple federal laws.

smcphail.bsky.social reposted

smcphail.bsky.social reposted

BREAKING: We, alongside @campaignlegal.org, sued the FEC over its advisory opinion allowing wealthy donors and special interests to spend millions in coordination with candidates—while hiding who may be spending big to influence votes. The court must reject this illegal opinion.

citizensforethics.orgCREW, CLC sue FEC to strike down unlawful advisory opinion on canvassing coordination - CREW | Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in WashingtonCampaign Legal Center and CREW filed a complaint asking the U.S. District Court for DC to strike down an unlawful 2024 FEC advisory opinion.

smcphail.bsky.social reposted

NEW: We just submitted an amicus brief urging the court to reject the National Park Service's effort to remove an exhibit about freedom and slavery from Independence National Historical Park in Philadelphia. Read more:

citizensforethics.orgCREW files amicus brief in support of restoring Freedom and Slavery Exhibit - CREW | Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in WashingtonRemoving the Freedom and Slavery Exhibit at the Independence National Historical Park would undercut an accurate portrayal of U.S. history.