Pinned
Stephen Aguilar
Stephen Aguilar
@stephenaguilar.com
Educational researcher focused on EdTech x AI,student engagement and motivation. Associate professor at USC Rossier. Associate Director of USC Center for Generative AI and Society
1K followers641 following547 posts
My author copies are here, and I've decided to make them unique by signing and embossing them with a custom stamp. I thought it would be nice for folks to receive something special, especially in a world filled with synthetic products made by AI. Cool poster by @reforest-kelley.bsky.social
Stephen Aguilar reposted
AI didn't break your course. It stress-tested it. In today's blog post, @stephenaguilar.com explores how generative AI is challenging traditional assessment in higher education and offers a practical framework for teaching staff who are wondering where to begin. Read on: bit.ly/3TYFm83
Stephen Aguilar reposted
Are we asking the right questions when it comes to AI in higher ed? @stephenaguilar.com’s “Authenticating Intelligence” explores how gen-AI challenges traditional assessment and forces educators to rethink meaningful learning. Read the blog: https://bit.ly/4hlYW88 🍎 #AcademicSky #BookSky
A German court just held Google responsible for false info from AI Overviews. Good. Treat AI like food or cars. Set tolerances. Measure real outputs. Publish the error rates companies bury in fine print. www.wired.com/story/a-cour...
EdTech keeps selling promises. Administrators keep buying without asking hard questions. What do you need to know before investing in AI for your school? I laid it out. www.the74million.org/article/what...
NSF is cutting basic science 20-30% to fund a $1.5B AI initiative. That's cannibalism. Google, CRISPR, barcodes—none funded with a commercial application in mind. Basic science is the foundation of the AI revolution. Gut it now. The breakthroughs stop too. www.nsf.gov/impacts/google
My latest for @the74.bsky.social. As EdTech continues to sell promises, administrators and school leaders should be asking these questions. www.the74million.org/article/what...
Stephen Aguilar reposted
Great to hear @mattbernacki.bsky.social talking to @stephenaguilar.com about the power of learning analytics for understanding and supporting student success, as well as how #GenAI can support such work. podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/a...
Authenticating Intelligence has 100 plays on Spotify! It may not be a lot, but we all have to start somewhere. Plus, I have similar numbers on YouTube and Apple Podcasts. Give it a listen. Spotify: bit.ly/AuthIntelSp Apple: apple.co/4a4lVjG YouTube: bit.ly/AuthIntelYT
Stay tuned for a report from @uscrossier.bsky.social and my center that will help folks navigate these things better.
"In total, they shared 90 messages from 79 companies .... The sheer avalanche of options makes the task of finding a quality tool that much harder. The superintendents also said they’ve found the flood of emails takes away their time and attention."
I mean self-indulgent love powered by sycophantic AI is still a type of love, I suppose. We just used to think that it was a bad thing.
In @nytopinion.nytimes.com What happens when your parent falls in love with an A.I. chatbot? In this episode of “Divided,” Ernie confronts his mother, Celeste, and they try to bridge their differences — and rethink what love could look like.
"There are some baseline tasks that can be offloaded, but we can’t just, you know, undercut all of the entry-level positions, because then there won’t be people who develop the experience to really understand what happens when AI fails.” thehill.com/homenews/edu...
It’s not impossible to build a distributed community. I’m in many outside of my profession. The trouble is that in person communities are superior when it comes to learning, and it’s proven tough to re-establish them post-pandemic.
This issue also has knock-on effects, like demolishing campus culture (no one is around during the day, buildings are empty, there are no good times to schedule seminars, etc.)
Join me Sun, 4/19-1:30pm - 2:30pm at the @latimes.com Festival of Books! Session Title: Creativity and Curiosity in the Age of AI: From the Arts to Education Grab tickets online at latimes.com/fob starting Sunday, April 12, or at ticket booth #390 on the day of, while supplies last.
Given the current climate, Sal can be wrong infinity times—it won't matter. That said, calling out EdTech over hype that is never realized is like shooting fish in a barrel. It's their job to sell things, not make a difference. I just wish more folks knew that.
How many times does Sal Khan need to be wrong before people stop listening to him? @mattbarnum.bsky.social gets him on the record basically admitting Khanmigo has been a giant failure. Students aren’t into it. Which, ahem, I predicted *two years ago* at the peak of the AI-in-education hype cycle.
I have similar thoughts on Ed Research. It's easy enough to find disparities/inequities and show that they are statistically significant and/or people talk about them coherently (e.g., Qual work). But such findings are meaningless unless they're paired theories of action or contribute to theory.
first heading to teach this quarter's class on Developmental Psychology, then off to the airport to make it to #CDS2026 with this gem of a "zoom out" take in my pocket.. open.substack.com/pub/paulbloo...
This week on the Authenticating Intelligence Podcast I sit down with Dan O’Brien (former Blue Sky Studios animator) to talk about the "homogenization" of animation and the quiet threat to entry-level craft. youtu.be/dIY99L0zPvM
Creativity isn't simply taking that initial spark and making it "real." It's refining; rendering the clumsy into expression. It takes time. Sure, you can try to prompt your way there, but that process is crude—especially if you don't really know what you're doing.
Lots of tech dudes think the "idea" is the important part of creating, not the creative journey you take through work to give that idea actual meaning. Ideas are the easiest, cheapest and least fulfilling part of it. Giving ideas life through work, and sharing that work with others, is the stuff.
Nothing humans make is neutral. That includes EdTech. Tools are extensions of our cognition, and make plain what we value when we use them to engage with the world around us. I dig into this concept a fair bit in Authenticating Intelligence.
Education technology is never neutral by @daisychristo.bsky.social open.substack.com/pub/daisychr...
Stephen Aguilar reposted
I felt the same. Also Project Hail Mary is one of the best movies I've seen in a while. It's ALSO very true to the book (won't spoil it). If you liked the book you'll really enjoy this movie. Breath of fresh air.
Been thinking a lot about this fantastic video about "haptic" filmmaking, movies that have solidity and realness as opposed to the thin uncanniness of so many contemporary movies. This is something that Project Hail Mary really nails. It all *feels* solidly physical www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvwP...
Read this thread. I'm the son of immigrants. I was a teacher in a majority English Language Learner district where I was the English Language Development Coordinator. Providing free access to education ALWAYS makes everything better. To argue otherwise is to be an idiot fueled by ignorance.
There's a hearing in the House today—bitterly ironic that it's being hosted by the Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution—entitled #Immigration Policy by Court Order: The Adverse Effects of Plyler v. Doe. I'm gonna use this thread to share some thoughts. judiciary.house.gov/committee-ac...
Pre-order is live! a.co/d/00VJtuU2
Here's the final book jacket for Authenticating Intelligence. Super happy with how it came out, and thrilled to have some wonderful endorsements from folks I respect.
Stop the presses! More hours spent trying to learn with support from an educator leads to more learning. 🤯 The fact that there are folks who disagree—or ignore—this fact is shameful. I'm glad folks like Morgan exist to call them out on it.
When kids get less instructional time, they learn less. It's maybe the single most obvious finding in all of education research, yet there are countless examples of policymakers pretending it's not true.
AI is moving fast. The US school system? Not so much. I’m joined by @mpolikoff.bsky.social on the Authenticating Intelligence Podcast to discuss how AI is shaking up our locally controlled (and very fragmented) education system. youtu.be/274C1RpXOMY
This sums up my feelings about the pice in Nature pretty well.
Nature published another pile of trash i am trying to catch up on some of my reading but this one is getting under my skin so here’s a thread highlighting why this piece is either ill-informed or intentionally ignorant of a wealth of knowledge from embodied cog sci and related fields 1/
Stephen Aguilar reposted
A very good read for people who don't understand the federal role in research and its importance. // "'I came because America was the place to do science,' he said." www.nytimes.com/2026/03/13/u...
In my interview with EdSoruce I highlight a key argument from Authenticating Intelligence: Educators should understand "AI as a constellation of tools, a series of tools, and then they can decide what problems those tools are going to be used to address.” edsource.org/2026/califor...
Stephen Aguilar reposted
It's a first for the @uscedpolicyhub.bsky.social Substack - we are sharing brand new, original research results! @annarsaavedra.bsky.social, Amie Rapaport and I are looking into reasons for teen absenteeism using the Understanding America Study edpolicyhub.substack.com/p/the-driver...