Stephen Aguilar

Stephen Aguilar

@stephenaguilar.com

Educational researcher focused on EdTech x AI,student engagement and motivation. Associate professor at USC Rossier. Associate Director of USC Center for Generative AI and Society

1K followers641 following547 posts

Pinned

It's first-proof-lookin'-at-Wednesday! A new holiday I just made up. Delighted to report that yes, it contains all my favorite typos. Thank god for a second set of human eyes!

The same AI tool can produce brilliant work or useless slop. The difference is rarely the tool. Heck, even us experts get fooled by a confident wrong answer, especially if it's at the edges of what we know. Hopefully soon we'll learn that AI doesn't lower the bar for expertise. It raises it.

LAUSD just named its third superintendent in four years, but that's not even the headline. The last one resigned amid an FBI probe into a $6.2 million AI chatbot deal. The company folded. Half a million students got left holding the bag.

My book Authenticating Intelligence comes out in under two months. My editing hack: read every page out loud. Awkward sentences sound ten times worse spoken. Brutal, but it was worth it. Did it catch every typo? Nope. Probably added a few. Perfection's overrated.

Stay tuned for a report from @uscrossier.bsky.social and my center that will help folks navigate these things better.

Morgan Polikoff@mpolikoff.bsky.social

"In total, they shared 90 messages from 79 companies .... The sheer avalanche of options makes the task of finding a quality tool that much harder. The superintendents also said they’ve found the flood of emails takes away their time and attention."

Oh good. More AI stuff founded on gut feelings because there isn't enough AI stuff already.

The 74@the74.bsky.social

Three nonprofit education heavyweights are coming together to create an affordable undergraduate institution for the AI era. Here's the lowdown www.the74million.org/article/five...

I mean self-indulgent love powered by sycophantic AI is still a type of love, I suppose. We just used to think that it was a bad thing.

The New York Times@nytimes.com

In @nytopinion.nytimes.com What happens when your parent falls in love with an A.I. chatbot? In this episode of “Divided,” Ernie confronts his mother, Celeste, and they try to bridge their differences — and rethink what love could look like.

"There are some baseline tasks that can be offloaded, but we can’t just, you know, undercut all of the entry-level positions, because then there won’t be people who develop the experience to really understand what happens when AI fails.” thehill.com/homenews/edu...

thehill.comAs AI pushes students to reconsider majors, universities struggle to adaptA recent poll shows AI’s increasing role in how students decide on college majors, creating a rapidly developing situation for universities that are still struggling to determine how the technology…

It’s not impossible to build a distributed community. I’m in many outside of my profession. The trouble is that in person communities are superior when it comes to learning, and it’s proven tough to re-establish them post-pandemic.

Morgan Polikoff@mpolikoff.bsky.social

This issue also has knock-on effects, like demolishing campus culture (no one is around during the day, buildings are empty, there are no good times to schedule seminars, etc.)

Given the current climate, Sal can be wrong infinity times—it won't matter. That said, calling out EdTech over hype that is never realized is like shooting fish in a barrel. It's their job to sell things, not make a difference. I just wish more folks knew that.

Benjamin Riley@benjaminjriley.bsky.social

How many times does Sal Khan need to be wrong before people stop listening to him? @mattbarnum.bsky.social gets him on the record basically admitting Khanmigo has been a giant failure. Students aren’t into it. Which, ahem, I predicted *two years ago* at the peak of the AI-in-education hype cycle.

Listen us academics reach DOZENS of people with our work.

Laura K. Nelson@lauraknelson.bsky.social

I got a notification that an article I co-authored and published in a journal (should I name names?) is among their most cited articles. Awesome for us. But folks, it's been cited a whopping *5* times. So, um, yeah.

I have similar thoughts on Ed Research. It's easy enough to find disparities/inequities and show that they are statistically significant and/or people talk about them coherently (e.g., Qual work). But such findings are meaningless unless they're paired theories of action or contribute to theory.

Kirsten Read@kreadlab.bsky.social

first heading to teach this quarter's class on Developmental Psychology, then off to the airport to make it to #CDS2026 with this gem of a "zoom out" take in my pocket.. open.substack.com/pub/paulbloo...

Creativity isn't simply taking that initial spark and making it "real." It's refining; rendering the clumsy into expression. It takes time. Sure, you can try to prompt your way there, but that process is crude—especially if you don't really know what you're doing.

John Scalzi@scalzi.com

Lots of tech dudes think the "idea" is the important part of creating, not the creative journey you take through work to give that idea actual meaning. Ideas are the easiest, cheapest and least fulfilling part of it. Giving ideas life through work, and sharing that work with others, is the stuff.

Nothing humans make is neutral. That includes EdTech. Tools are extensions of our cognition, and make plain what we value when we use them to engage with the world around us. I dig into this concept a fair bit in Authenticating Intelligence.

Paul Kirschner@paulkirschner.bsky.social

Education technology is never neutral by @daisychristo.bsky.social open.substack.com/pub/daisychr...

I felt the same. Also Project Hail Mary is one of the best movies I've seen in a while. It's ALSO very true to the book (won't spoil it). If you liked the book you'll really enjoy this movie. Breath of fresh air.

Chris Hayes@chrislhayes.bsky.social

Been thinking a lot about this fantastic video about "haptic" filmmaking, movies that have solidity and realness as opposed to the thin uncanniness of so many contemporary movies. This is something that Project Hail Mary really nails. It all *feels* solidly physical www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvwP...

LinkedIn thoughts about AI are weird. Heading: "Imagine if we used computers the way many organizations use AI today." I guess I need *checks desk* two more screens to fully integrate computers into my workflow. I'm so close!

Read this thread. I'm the son of immigrants. I was a teacher in a majority English Language Learner district where I was the English Language Development Coordinator. Providing free access to education ALWAYS makes everything better. To argue otherwise is to be an idiot fueled by ignorance.

Conor P. Williams@conorpwilliams.bsky.social

There's a hearing in the House today—bitterly ironic that it's being hosted by the Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution—entitled #Immigration Policy by Court Order: The Adverse Effects of Plyler v. Doe. I'm gonna use this thread to share some thoughts. judiciary.house.gov/committee-ac...

Oh, and I was an ELL kid. English is my second language. (You can't tell, I don't have an accent.) I've published/written: 1 book >50 papers >50 grant applications (over $9MM funded) ~20 op-eds I did all that thanks to public K12 education. (Colton Joint Unified School District, in CA)

Here's the final book jacket for Authenticating Intelligence. Super happy with how it came out, and thrilled to have some wonderful endorsements from folks I respect.

Stop the presses! More hours spent trying to learn with support from an educator leads to more learning. 🤯 The fact that there are folks who disagree—or ignore—this fact is shameful. I'm glad folks like Morgan exist to call them out on it.

Morgan Polikoff@mpolikoff.bsky.social

When kids get less instructional time, they learn less. It's maybe the single most obvious finding in all of education research, yet there are countless examples of policymakers pretending it's not true.

This sums up my feelings about the pice in Nature pretty well.

Dr Abeba Birhane@abeba.blacksky.app

Nature published another pile of trash i am trying to catch up on some of my reading but this one is getting under my skin so here’s a thread highlighting why this piece is either ill-informed or intentionally ignorant of a wealth of knowledge from embodied cog sci and related fields 1/

"The new wealth gap is who cares about intellectual integrity and who doesn't. Here are 17 prompts that..."

Derek Silva@derekcrim.bsky.social

fuck this so much we are so not prepared for the mountain of dogshit “scholarship” about to flood journals everywhere

From chapter 9 of Authenticating Intelligence:

Carl T. Bergstrom@carlbergstrom.com

Readers may not be aware that all Philip had to do was ask nicely and he already got my “expert advice” on his (very good) book Citizen Scholar. No slop, no bullshit. We should all do more of that: Reach out to humans we know and/or trust.

Anthropic came out with a report. Sectors that keep shoving AI into every nook and cranny predict that AI will *checks notes* be incorporated into a bunch of stuff. I did my own back of the envelope calculations and came up with this. I'm entertaining offers from VCs. Bidding starts at 500 billion

In my interview with EdSoruce I highlight a key argument from Authenticating Intelligence: Educators should understand "AI as a constellation of tools, a series of tools, and then they can decide what problems those tools are going to be used to address.” edsource.org/2026/califor...

edsource.orgCalifornia schools debate how much AI belongs in classroomsClose vetting of artificial intelligence programs, strong data protections, ongoing feedback from school community remain critical in AI implementation.

Stephen Aguilar reposted