Stephen Spaulding

Stephen Spaulding

@stevespaulding.bsky.social

Brennan Center at NYU Law | Used-to-be: Policy Director for Senator Amy Klobuchar + the Senate Rules Committee | VP @ Common Cause | Sr. Counsel to Representative Zoe Lofgren + House Admin Committee Dems | Special Counsel at the FEC | opinions are my own 🏳️‍🌈

1.9K followers377 following400 posts

Stephen Spaulding reposted

Since Citizens United, the composition of the top 40 donors in the midterms has shifted dramatically: more money, more support for Republicans, less transparency, and new industries like crypto surging while older sectors like labor disappear. bit.ly/4BsIIS9

brennancenter.orgBig Changes to Makeup of the Biggest Midterm DonorsSince Citizens United, the composition of the top 40 donors in the midterms has shifted dramatically: more money, more support for Republicans, less transparency, and new industries like crypto surging while older sectors like labor disappear.

Extraordinary language from Justice Kagan last night. She said SCOTUS has: —“Depriv[ed] masses of citizens” of the right to equality in voting. —Created a “nightmare” with the money it has unleashed in our elections. The kicker: she said that she misses the “kind of legitimacy” SCOTUS once had.

wapo.stJustice Kagan says Supreme Court has damaged democracy with recent rulingsThe liberal justice took aim at the conservative majority’s rulings on the Voting Rights Act, campaign finance and partisan gerrymandering.
View full thread
View full thread

That's one reason among many that we need term limits for U.S. Supreme Court justices. Under the most popular proposal, justices would serve for 18 years before transitioning to senior status. Importantly, this means each president would get two -- and only two -- SCOTUS noms.

So there'd be regular turnover. Each president could leave an equal imprint on the bench and avoid the situation where one president could get three, four, five, or even more picks -- and others (like President Carter) who got none.

View full thread

I spoke with @axios.com about the Trump administration’s unprecedented use of the shadow docket to get SCOTUS to revive presidential policies that lower-court judges—including judges appointed by presidents of both parties—have found likely unlawful. www.axios.com/2026/09/29/t...

axios.comTrump leans on SCOTUS shadow docket more than Biden, Obama and Bush combinedTrump's 41 filings far outpace the emergency applications of recent administrations.

Today the Trump administration hit a new milestone. It filed its 41st application on the Supreme Court's shadow docket. Forty-one. That's how many it filed during the president's *entire* first term.

View full thread

We need reform to the shadow docket, and Congress needs to act. First, the justices should have to explain themselves when issuing their decisions. That's what courts are supposed to do. Explain themselves. Second, the shadow docket should only be used for true emergencies.

Today the Trump administration hit a new milestone. It filed its 41st application on the Supreme Court's shadow docket. Forty-one. That's how many it filed during the president's *entire* first term.

View full thread

The latest case involves the administration's efforts to deny gender affirming care to people who are incarcerated. A Reagan-appointed federal district judge ruled the Trump administration violated federal law when it issued this new policy denying said care.

Now, as has become its habit, the administration is asking the Supreme Court to weigh-in now, and not wait for the case to reach the Court in the usual way--after a trial and/or more extensive consideration.

Today the Trump administration hit a new milestone. It filed its 41st application on the Supreme Court's shadow docket. Forty-one. That's how many it filed during the president's *entire* first term.

The Trump administration has been using the shadow docket in unprecedented ways to urge the Supreme Court to expedite review of lower court decisions—made by judges appointed by presidents of both parties—that have found the administration's actions to be likely unlawful.

Stephen Spaulding reposted

"If mounting threats and baseless impeachments influence who is willing to serve as a judge, how judges make decisions or whether their families can live safely, we risk allowing intimidation to infect the judicial process," a former federal judge writes in @thehill.com.

thehill.comAttacks and threats against federal judges have spiked, and it threatens our democracyIf those in power continue attacking judges with violent words and images without consequence, we risk losing the founders’ design of judicial independence.

NEW: Today Marquette released fresh September polling on SCOTUS. Public approval continues to decline. 📉 But support for Supreme Court term limits remains strong & resilient at 79 percent—including supermajorities of Republicans, Democrats, and Independents.

today.marquette.eduMarquette Law School Poll finds approval of United States Supreme Court declines from 47% to 43% | Marquette TodayAlso: A new Marquette Law School Poll national survey finds approval of the United States Supreme Court dipped to 43% in September, down from 47% in July. Disapproval rose to 57% in September, from 53...

New Hampshire’s Chief Justice resigned today—the result of an investigation done pursuant to transparent, enforceable judicial ethics rules. By contrast, SCOTUS—the highest court in the land—has no such rules. That must change.

nhpr.orgNH Chief Justice MacDonald announces resignation; ethics probe loomedGordon MacDonald, the state's top judge, announced his sudden resignation on Tuesday. He was facing potential discipline for his role in a unique personnel maneuver that benefited a top ally.

Stephen Spaulding reposted

BREAKING: Tonight’s Supreme Court ruling is a victory for the millions of American citizens who rely on mail voting. The Trump administration tried to use the postal service to interfere in our elections: it failed. 1/2

The Supreme Court has had its own building for only about 91 years. Kind of remarkable, when you think about it. Congress otherwise loaned the Court space in the Capitol, most recently the Old Senate Chamber.

The @washingtonpost.com just covered a major new report that the @brennancenter.org published today. We interviewed 35 sitting & retired federal judges. What they told us was chilling: judges and their families are facing a barrage of threats to their safety. This must be addressed.

Brennan Center@brennancenter.org

We interviewed 35 federal judges. Every single one said the dangers federal judges face are more serious today than in the past. @washingtonpost.com breaks down our report, which covers the sharp rise in threats over the past decade and makes recommendations.

Stephen Spaulding reposted

New: Federal judges and their families are facing extraordinary pressures. Improved security can ensure that they remain safe and that judicial independence remains uncompromised. Here are our recommendations.

brennancenter.orgProtecting Judges from Rising ThreatsFederal judges and their families are facing extraordinary pressures. Improved security can ensure that they remain safe and that judicial independence remains uncompromised.

Here's what happened today at SCOTUS re: voting ⬇️

Brennan Center@brennancenter.org

BREAKING: The Supreme Court has not ruled on the merits of President Trump’s executive order targeting mail voting. Today’s interim decision only addresses the timing. Voting rights groups will continue to vigorously pursue all available avenues to challenge the executive order. 1/2

61 years ago today, the Voting Rights Act became law. Congress then reauthorized it five times—each time with overwhelming bipartisan votes. Then the Roberts Court started dismantling it. Congress must be repair & strengthen the VRA after the damage done by the Supreme Court.