Judith

Judith

@studiojkt.com

Digital Artist | UI/UX Centered Front-End Dev | Accessibility & Usability Advocate "The Art of Healing in a Digital World." ©️2026 Studio JKT. All Rights Reserved.

360 followers65 following260 posts

Pinned

The greatest danger from AI isn’t that it suddenly “decides to kill us.” I’m increasingly more concerned about the human systems we build around it: bad data, security vulnerabilities, poor oversight, misplaced trust, inadequate safeguards and failures to verify before acting.

On Oct. 17, France's Orchestre du Nouveau Monde performed "The Hanging Tree" from The Hunger Games in solidarity with student protesters amid growing anger over the cost of living and school conditions. They eventually halted the performance because conditions became too dangerous.

The responsibility for fair compensation should rest with the employer or delivery platform, not with customers feeling pressured at checkout.

Artificial intelligence and artificial superintelligence are not scientifically interchangeable terms. 

‼️ “Seven Cornell inhuman scum drugged and raped a woman for seven hours advertising it to an entire group chat.” ‼️👇🏼 #cornell7

Humans are deploying increasingly capable systems into messy environments full of vulnerabilities, bad data, leaked credentials, poorly designed permissions, and other humans doing unpredictable things. Whatever happens downstream, humans remain a major part of that chain…

Trump’s switch from “artificial intelligence” to “super intelligence” creates a terminology problem. In AI research, superintelligence already has a specific meaning: a hypothetical system whose capabilities substantially exceed humans across a very broad range of domains.

View full thread

If everything from a chatbot on your phone to a frontier reasoning model becomes “super intelligence,” what do we call the thing researchers have historically meant by superintelligence? A terminology change isn’t evidence that today’s AI has crossed that technical threshold.

Nothing clears up confusion over one technical term quite like misusing a second technical term that already has a definition. 🤦🏻‍♀️

Trump’s switch from “artificial intelligence” to “super intelligence” creates a terminology problem. In AI research, superintelligence already has a specific meaning: a hypothetical system whose capabilities substantially exceed humans across a very broad range of domains.

“Artificial” in artificial intelligence doesn’t mean fake. It means the intelligence is produced by an artificial, human-made system rather than a biological organism. Artificial satellites aren’t fake satellites. Artificial limbs aren’t fake limbs.

And “superintelligence” isn’t a compliment meaning “really impressive AI.” It’s a capability classification. Calling today’s AI superintelligence doesn’t give it those capabilities any more than renaming a sports car a “hypersonic vehicle” makes it travel at Mach 5.

The greatest danger from AI isn’t that it suddenly “decides to kill us.” I’m increasingly more concerned about the human systems we build around it: bad data, security vulnerabilities, poor oversight, misplaced trust, inadequate safeguards and failures to verify before acting.

View full thread

Humans are putting increasingly powerful technology into systems with bad information, vulnerabilities and imperfect oversight then trusting the technology enough that nobody catches the error before the consequences become irreversible.

AI can be extraordinarily capable. It can also be wrong, incomplete or working from a false premise. The more consequential the decision, the more important human verification becomes, not less...

The greatest danger from AI isn’t that it suddenly “decides to kill us.” I’m increasingly more concerned about the human systems we build around it: bad data, security vulnerabilities, poor oversight, misplaced trust, inadequate safeguards and failures to verify before acting.

Minab is a horrifying example. The Iranian school site struck by the U.S. was classified in a military database as an IRGC facility, despite evidence that its use had changed. An analyst documented changes as early as 2019 but in a system that wasn’t connected to the primary targeting database.

Some personnel expected Maven to flag stale or inconsistent intelligence. It didn’t. The site passed through multiple stages of human review before the strike was authorized. Horrifyingly more than 150 people were killed, including at least 123 children.

Judith reposted

another researcher accuses OpenAI of training on conversations and then claiming a breakthrough

Beautiful… Darby‘s Mum “Patricia was an English high school teacher, a librarian and a Barrister/attorney. Despite participating in reality. She also struggled with it.”

“Don’t let your empathy, rob people of the necessary consequences they need to suffer for their actions.” Ccelli Exponent’s Mom (on TickTock)

The Arabs/Muslims are evil narrative is being pushed by Israel, all the bots, all the fake accounts, all the ridiculous comments, all of it.

Judith reposted

Dragonflies fun facts - Just one dragonfly can consume over 100 mosquitos in a day - Dragonflies can fly backwards - They have nearly 360° vision - Their wings inhibit bacterial growth due to their natural structures - They're actually beautiful

“If I cut you off, completely out of my life, understand something, you probably handed me the scissors.”

Judith reposted

🌱 "You are allowed to build a small, quiet, unimpressive life that makes you deeply happy and never apologize for it." —Michell C Clark

“Do you know what you get when you give someone time, effort, and grace? Long term success.” Sarah Schauer