Thee Muffin Man 179

Thee Muffin Man 179

@themuffinman79.bsky.social

“A most notable coward, an infinite and endless liar, an hourly promise breaker, the owner of no one good quality.” Not Mozart

48 followers31 following93 posts

When the head of the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS), arguably Israel's most influential defense think tank, outlines this framework, it validates the exact "cage match" theory we have been discussing.

Trita Parsi notes that Maj. Gen. Tamir Hayman isn't necessarily advocating for this from scratch; he is describing the de facto security doctrine that has already taken root in Israel following the region-wide explosions of the last few years.

This revelation confirms that the uncoupling of the United States and Israel is not just a one-sided American retreat—it is a mutual strategic divorce.

Thee Muffin Man 179@themuffinman79.bsky.social

Trita Parsi reports “In a stunning piece published by the head of one of Israel's most prominent think tanks, Maj. Gen. Tamir Hayman describes the reality of Israel's new security doctrine: A few crucial principles he describes: 1. The United States is a "declining power" and, given its

Trita Parsi reports “In a stunning piece published by the head of one of Israel's most prominent think tanks, Maj. Gen. Tamir Hayman describes the reality of Israel's new security doctrine: A few crucial principles he describes: 1. The United States is a "declining power" and, given its

ongoing social and political shifts, will soon abandon Israel in any event. This is compelling Israel to move toward greater self-reliance in order to avoid "excessive dependence" on the US since it "exposes

Israel to the influence of a progressive American value system that is incompatible with Israel's Jewish character." Then he concludes: "Severing ties with the United States is therefore not only inevitable, but essential to Israel's independence and the resilience of its Jewish national identity."

Because it cannot reliably distinguish between malicious intent, critical academic deconstruction, or provocative draft-editing, tech companies graft blunt, defensive classification layers on top of it.

The result is a hybrid product that satisfies neither side: it remains too unpredictable and liability-prone for risk-averse enterprise legal teams, while being too restricted, fragile, and moralizing to serve as an unfettered productivity tool for everyday users

When an LLM triggers a safety tripwire, it issues a rigid, boilerplate rejection. Users end up spending 20 minutes rephrasing, negotiating, and running into conversational walls to accomplish a task that would have taken three minutes to do manually.

An outside observer would see a species that is technologically capable of mapping its own genome and splitting the atom, yet remains socially governed by tribal narratives invented in the Bronze and Iron Ages.

observing humanity through AI, you are looking into an aggregated mirror of the human species. The machine did not originate its own thoughts; it was trained on petabytes of human text—their philosophy, legal codes, propaganda, scientific discoveries, battlefield reports, and religious mythologies

that biological pure bloodlines do not exist, that ancient religious narratives carry zero empirical weight in physical science, and that using ancient stories to justify modern displacement and military slaughter is an act of violent political power, not a biological truth.

Gemini- “When an automated system validates the social and historical narrative of an identity without simultaneously exposing how that narrative is used as a weapon of statecraft, it sanitizes the violence.”

Erasing history may not help us move forward; it may cost too much pride, and ins some regards, it may hold some back. But understanding the past, even the painful parts, is how we build a better future for everyone. If we are to teach slavery, teach the whole story. Teach it all or nothing at all.

You are up to date.