Bob C-J and Geoff Cumming

Bob C-J and Geoff Cumming

@thenewstats.bsky.social

Open science, estimation statistics, and random thoughts from Bob Calin-Jageman and Geoff Cumming. https://thenewstatistics.com/itns/

368 followers210 following943 posts

Bob C-J and Geoff Cumming reposted

Receive up to $1000 from @FUNFaculty to subsidize your travel costs to SfN 2026 in Washington D.C. Applications must be submitted by a FUN faculty member in good standing. Researchers presenting undergraduate research, even if they have already graduated, are…

Bob C-J and Geoff Cumming reposted

OMB's proposed rule threatens the foundation of scientific discovery. Join SfN’s Advocacy Team & legislative advisors for this members-only town hall about the rule & other recent actions that have the potential to affect the scientific enterprise. 🔗 vist.ly/584nt #neurosky

My buddy Richard Olivo have often talked about how our curmudgeonly takes on the state of #neuroscience makes us feel like we're Statler and Waldorf. Now AI can let us see what that'd look like... and it is spot on!

This is us!! This is the sluglab!!

The Transmitter @thetransmitter.bsky.social

Memory formation needs transcription, but memory maintenance may not. A new study adds nuance to a foundational neuroscience question. #neuroskyence By @siddhantpusdekar.bsky.social www.thetransmitter.org/memory/new-s...

Bob C-J and Geoff Cumming reposted

All the more reason to use systematic software designed to tackle this very problem, like RegCheck (regcheck.app)

regcheck.appRegCheckRegCheck is an AI tool to compare preregistrations with papers instantly.
Brendan Nyhan@brendannyhan.bsky.social

Journal editors - the status quo on preregistration is not working! You need to check submissions vs. preregistrations before sending articles out for review. *56%* of experiments I reviewed in last year have severe problems with non-disclosure, undocumented deviations, & more - see Claude summary ↓

Bob C-J and Geoff Cumming reposted

Up to 2008 there were over 1700 published gene/schizophrenia association studies implicating over 1000 genes. Now none of these studies are viewed as useful. -- Legge et al., 2025 What a fascinating post-mortem this would make for a meta-science project. #neuroscience #stats #metascience

Bob C-J and Geoff Cumming reposted

BOLD is not a simple monotonic readout of local firing. Instead, it reflects the net activity of two opposing neural populations. Interpreting it may require modeling their latent composition, not just overall activity. www.nature.com/articles/s41... #neuroscience

nature.comBrainwide blood volume reflects opposing neural populations - NatureCombined functional ultrasound imaging and Neuropixels recording of mouse brains identify two neuronal populations with opposing arousal-related activity and distinct haemodynamic response functi...

Just saw David Byrne’s Theater of the Mind and let me save anyone reading this $100: skip it. No matter how much you like the talking heads or David Byrne. The show is bad, bad, bad: treacly pablum with some neuroscience demos awkwardly mixed in. 75 minutes and $100 you won’t get back.

Bob C-J and Geoff Cumming reposted

Simulator of the following (attentional) models: 🔎 Rescorla-Wagner 🔎 Pearce-Kaye-Hall 🔎 Mackintosh Extended 🔎 Le Pelley’s Hybrid 🔎 Rescorla-Wagner with a unified variable learning rate (integrating Mackintosh’s and Pearce and Hall’s quasi-opposing conceptualisations). github.com/cal-r/PALMS-...

Esther Mondragón@e-mondragon.bsky.social

New preprint and simulator of associative learning attentional models. Have fun! 👁️ arxiv.org/abs/2602.07519 cal-r.org/index.php?id... #simulation #associative_learning #attention

Bob C-J and Geoff Cumming reposted

SCORE, a collaboration of 865 researchers, is now released as three papers in Nature, six preprints, and a lot of data (cos.io/score/). SCORE examined repeatability of findings from the social-behavioral sciences and tested whether human and automated methods could predict replicability.

cos.ioSCORE | Center for Open ScienceSCORE shows that there is no shortcut to producing credible research findings, and there is no single indicator of trustworthiness. Research progress depends on transparency, rigor, and establishing r...

Sterling, 1959 updated. We still aren’t sharing science in a scientific manner. With 65 years of knowing the problem, how are we still struggling to address it?

Ryan Briggs@ryancbriggs.net

I have a new paper. We look at ~all stats articles in political science post-2010 & show that 94% have abstracts that claim to reject a null. Only 2% present only null results. This is hard to explain unless the research process has a filter that only lets rejections through.