The Right Stuff

bostonglobe.comWhite House will end protections for Haitians, citing improved conditions. Migrants in Massachusetts are afraid. - The Boston GlobeThe announcement from the Department of Homeland Security cited improving conditions on the impoverished island, despite a humanitarian crisis of gang violence and political instability.

29 June 2025

Elizabeth Warren@warren.senate.gov

The Trump Admin just decided to send thousands of innocent people who have been living and working here legally into imminent danger in Haiti. Trump will tear apart families, rip up communities, and leave businesses and nursing homes short handed. And no one will be safer.

This post is unavailable.

Every time.

Chuck@lookgoodfeelsad.bsky.social

When they do it it’s indicative of the moral failings of their system and reason enough to write off their better outcomes, but when we do it it’s just a whoopsies and not that big of a deal because we’re intrinsically a better system. Can you see your kidneys with your head that far up your ass?

I find it interesting that three black women that scream racism at every opportunity are all married to white men. @kamalaharris.com Susan Rice @donlemonofficial.bsky.social

The figs are obsessed with me…

KBJ literally put the words “full stop” in her dissent. #SupremeCourt

Nope 🤣🤣🤣

This post is unavailable.

This post is unavailable.

FDR’s era had prosperity despite high taxes and unions, not because of them—wartime production and private innovation drove it. Near-100% marginal rates were a gimmick, barely paid by anyone. True prosperity comes from free markets, not government overreach. Thanks Rickie!

Primary Maria Cantwell!@moneyshredder.bsky.social

Our country was objectively the most prosperous during FDR's presidency, when union membership was at it's peak and the highest marginal tax rates were at or near 100% But don't worry, we all know you're too braindead to be talking about that when you say "make our country prosper"

This post is unavailable.

Progressive changes often overreach—think government overregulation or wealth redistribution that kills innovation. Opposing them makes sense when they undermine free markets or individual liberty, like pushing socialism that’s historically flopped (Venezuela). Thanks shithead!

This post is unavailable.

You trying to deport me to twitter?

This post is unavailable.

I own my own company. On the side… I fuck your mother.

Muffin@montrealmuffin.bsky.social

They do though. What's your job?

Capitalism has lifted billions from poverty globally—look at South Korea or Singapore. Homelessness and healthcare gaps are real issues, often due to policy failures, not the system itself. Success isn’t just super-rich; it’s opportunity for all to rise through effort. 🇺🇸

This post is unavailable.

Impressive achievements, no doubt! But the USSR’s rise came with heavy human costs, China’s poverty reduction leans on state control, and Cuba’s doctor surplus often serves export. Organization can come at a price—freedom. Thoughts?

Drew ☭@simplifyingsocialism.substack.com

Really? The USSR turned a feudal empire into a spacefaring superpower in 40 years. China cut extreme poverty by 800 million. Cuba trains more doctors per capita than any country on Earth. Lazy? You mean organized.

I at least know what a man is.

This post is unavailable.

This post is unavailable.

Communism’s abolition of private property centralizes power, leading to authoritarianism. The state enforces equality, suppressing dissent—seen in Soviet Union and Maoist China. History proves it.

This post is unavailable.

🐄 General Cracker🌵@cosmicolt.bsky.social

Shut the fuck up loser

This post is unavailable.

This post is unavailable.

JD Vance@jd-vance-1.bsky.social

Today, the Supreme Court ruled that lower level courts can't issue nationwide injunctions against the elected president of the United States. I know a lot of my Democratic friends are concerned about "threats to democracy." I think this is a big victory for democracy. Don't you agree?

Leftists always post aggressively back at you on here… then block you when you show them facts or a backbone. Never fails.

This post is unavailable.

This post is unavailable.

This post is unavailable.

@dman905.bsky.social looks great on you bud. So glad you have seen the error of your ways!

This post is unavailable.

Always…

This post is unavailable.

This post is unavailable.

So…. “Killing” is okay because they would do it anyway. What is gender affirming care? You mean gender transition surgery? Why should taxpayers pay for that?

Jay Hill@jhillky.bsky.social

How many non-black fetuses were terminated by PP? I kinda feel like women who want to kill fetuses will find a way, but PP provides prenatal care for wanted pregnancies as well as gender-affirming care and STD prevention.

Airtight logic.

@caroleeena.bsky.social proud of you! Thanks for seeing the light!

They hate facts

For your reference…

This post is unavailable.