Thomas Fraise

Thomas Fraise

@thfraise.bsky.social

Nuclear weapons, deterrence, secrecy, and democracy. Currently, Univ. of Copenhagen & Nuclear Knowledges. Co-editor in chief of PARISS Journal.

506 followers281 following244 posts

Pinned

What were the 'Wizards of Armageddon' good for? 🧙 Critiques of nuclear deterrence have mocked the "medieval wizardry" involved in their "esoteric body of learning" who would ultimately have amounted to little policy influence. My latest article argues differently. academic.oup.com/isagsq/artic...

academic.oup.comThe Magicians of Nuclear Strategy: Ritualized Knowledge Production and the Origins of Strategic Nuclear ThoughtAbstract. In the 1950s, a new intellectual figure emerged in American strategic debates: the nuclear strategist. Drawn largely from the RAND Corporation, t

It should be surprising that European allies perceive France as potentially less committed to Europe than the United Kingdom, the country who most famously refused to politically commit to Europe. Could be a method issue, I guess (from RAND Europe latest report)

Thomas Fraise reposted

Going from claiming your company is working on technology that might destroy humanity to leaking you’re on track to generate $100 billion in sales this year, just in time for the IPO. Makes it hard to defend the claims that this hasn’t all been a cynical form of marketing and regulatory capture.

I have a new paper out! It looks into the early history of nuclear secrecy and examines how US standards of secrecy diffused toward European allies through coercion and imitation, shaping their domestic practices. www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

tandfonline.comExporting nuclear secrecy. The transatlantic diffusion of nuclear secrecy practices in the postwar period (1945-1953)Published in Cambridge Review of International Affairs (Ahead of Print, 2026)
View full thread

I have a new paper out! It looks into the early history of nuclear secrecy and examines how US standards of secrecy diffused toward European allies through coercion and imitation, shaping their domestic practices. www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

tandfonline.comExporting nuclear secrecy. The transatlantic diffusion of nuclear secrecy practices in the postwar period (1945-1953)Published in Cambridge Review of International Affairs (Ahead of Print, 2026)

Our understanding of nuclear secrecy is heavily influenced by US-based (and to an extent, UK) case studies. This piece attemps to correct this tendency by looking at Sweden and France.

Thomas Fraise reposted

Thomas Fraise reposted

Replying to @kohngregory.bsky.social

His comment about becoming "head of the department of eugenics and race science at Harvard" seems to confirm that his whole DEI/race/woke-obsession is just him never having gotten over the fact that he was rejected at Harvard

An opportunity to repost my favorite Hume atheism persecution story

Kevin Zollman@kevinzollman.com

Academia was so much better before Woke. Sure, David Hume was never able to secure an academic job because he might have been an atheist. But at least no one made him use the singular "they"

Thomas Fraise reposted

Thomas Fraise reposted

Un texte qui me semble tout à fait important: critique des orientations du directeur de ScPo Luis Vassy en matière d'études internationales, avec de très bons rappels sur l'efficacité des outils des sciences sociales, y compris pour penser de façon "réaliste" la "puissance" aoc.media/analyse/2026...

aoc.mediaPenser le monde d’aujourd’hui avec des idées d’hier : Luis Vassy et l'international - AOC mediaLe directeur de Sciences Po a publié dans Le Grand Continent sa vision des études internationales : un retour au réalisme stratégique, une méfiance assumée envers le droit, une approche réduite à ce q...

What is the timeline of this kind of proposals? The UK retired the WE.177 in the 90s. It would probably have to redesign a warhead, or rework existing designs, without the possibility of testing and, presumably, with strained US support (French support maybe?).

I don't see how they could field those weapons before 2030/2035, which is presumed to be our next year of maximum danger. Also, with what budget, and to the sacrifice of which other programs? The problem is a bit different for France, but timeline issues are not different.

Pour The Conservation, j'explore ce que les évolutions des capacités cyber-offensives révèle des modalités du pari nucléaire. L'IA n'hackera pas la bombe demain, mais son fonctionnement normal dans le futur relève irréductiblement de la chance. theconversation.com/hacker-la-bo...

theconversation.comHacker la bombe ? Ce que l’IA Mythos révèle du pari de la dissuasion nucléaireL’essor des IA telles que Mythos met en lumière la vulnérabilité potentielle des arsenaux nucléaires, et complique le pari de la dissuasion nucléaire.

Unpopular opinion : on n'est pas obligé de prendre au sérieux n'importe quel théorie du complot issue de r/UFO simplement parce que la Maison Blanche en parle.

Le Parisien@leparisien.fr

27 février 2026, Nouveau-Mexique. Dans le comté de Bernalillo, à Albuquerque, Susan McCasland Wilkerson se presse. Il est 11 heures passées et la retraitée est attendue pour un rendez-vous médical. Elle claque la porte de son domicile, laissant à l’intérieur son mari...