Thomas Pope

Thomas Pope

@tompope.bsky.social

Chief Economist @instituteforgov.bsky.social

1.7K followers477 following148 posts

Pinned

My latest below previews the fiscal devo roadmap. This could be a radical change in how mayors operate, and will tell us a lot about the government's broader approach to devolution My blog lays out what the roadmap should do

Institute for Government@instituteforgovernment.org.uk

Tomorrow, alongside his budget, John Healey will unveil a new fiscal devolution roadmap. The roadmap will reveal how radical the Burnham government intends to be on devolution. Our chief economist @tompope.bsky.social sets out his key tests www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/comment/fisc...

Thomas Pope reposted

Thomas Pope reposted

๐Ÿ’ฏ๐Ÿ’ฏ๐Ÿ’ฏ(you get the idea) this makes so much sense from @timharford.ft.com - though I fear I can confidently predict that the Chancellor will do none of this (one example.. we don't levy VAT on children's shoes or clothes -- at least right-sized ones -- how about just making that a cash benefit)?

Thomas Pope reposted

Party conference season saw all political parties duck the big questions about the economy. @tompope.bsky.social reviews the tax and spend promises made at the conferences โ€“ and is left underwhelmed by a failure to confront the UKโ€™s fiscal reality www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/comment/no-p...

instituteforgovernment.org.ukNo political party is acknowledging the UKโ€™s fiscal reality | Institute for GovernmentParty conference season saw all political parties duck the big questions about the economy.

Thomas Pope reposted

NEW: Plans to reduce EHCPs look optimistic and Burnham's public service reforms still need a plan for schools In our first IfG Performance Tracker chapter, funded by @nuffieldfoundation.org, we look at how the government is performing on its schools agenda [1/9]

instituteforgovernment.org.ukPerformance Tracker 2026: Schools | Institute for GovernmentThe government must better measure success across its school priorities and set out a clear long-term vision for the structure of the school system.

Thomas Pope reposted

My latest for @instituteforgovernment.org.uk applauds Andy Burnham for tackling the absurdity of the triple lock. He will need to show more of the same boldness at the budget and beyond to properly fund his social care reform and other priorities www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/comment/burn...

instituteforgovernment.org.ukBurnham should follow triple lock reforms with more boldness on other fiscal problems | Institute for GovernmentThe PM is right to reform the pensions triple lock.

Thomas Pope reposted

The Treasury underestimated the impact of the triple lock was that they did not anticipate the seesaw between inflation and earnings. That is what has led to the big rise in spending and the pension growing well ahead of earnings. There are proposals around to ensure it grows with earnings.

View full thread

Ultimately I agree with where the committee has landed in its recommendations: now is not the time to radically change the remit of the OBR. It has simply become the latest bogeyman to take the blame for the UK's difficult fiscal position and government's difficulties in dealing with it

As we've recommended, the government should take the steps necessary to reduce focus on fiscal rule specifics by setting out clearer objectives, explaining how rules flow from those, + retaining enough headroom so small OBR judgments aren't decisive www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publication/...

instituteforgovernment.org.ukStrengthening the UKโ€™s fiscal framework | Institute for GovernmentThe UKโ€™s fiscal framework, including a flawed set of rules, incentivises bad policy decisions shaped by short-termism and fictional spending plans.

The report gives a good summary of the conflicting views on the OBR: it holds an influential position, its judgments are sometimes seen to be dictating policy, but its judgments only carry weight because of the fiscal rules and broader fiscal choices government has made

Thomas Pope reposted

NEW IfG report out today on how government should approach reforming health and disability benefits The big takeaway: the system needs to better match peopleโ€™s needs to the right support - through assessment reform, political leadership and more... www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publication/...

instituteforgovernment.org.ukDesigning better incapacity benefits | Institute for GovernmentPersonalising benefits and support is key to helping disabled people into work.

My latest for @instituteforgovernment.org.uk is a reflection on what No.10 North and devo might mean for policy eco-systems outside London (and specifically in Manchester). Reflections based on my 4 years living in Manchester working for a think tank instituteforgov.substack.com/p/on-no10-no...

instituteforgov.substack.comOn No.10 North and the Manchester policy ecosystemTom Pope, the IfGโ€™s Manchester correspondent, is optimistic about the future of UK politicsโ€™ self-styled second city

Thomas Pope reposted

Thomas Pope reposted

If the PM and chancellor are (finally) alive to the challenges facing them, then they must deliver a budget that meets them head on. This means presenting a coherent strategy for fiscal policy for the rest of this parliament and beyond www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/comment/burn...

instituteforgovernment.org.ukBurnham and Healey must avoid the budget mistakes of Starmer and Reeves | Institute for GovernmentThe chancellor should take difficult decisions at the budget rather than ducking tough choices.

Thomas Pope reposted

Thomas Pope reposted

It's not too late to sign up for this event tomorrow lunch. In person in Manchester if you're there (or online). How Burnham can make his devolution agenda succeed? With @drhannahwhite.bsky.social @lukeraikes.bsky.social @jenwilliamsft.bsky.social

Institute for Government@instituteforgovernment.org.uk

EVENT | Andy Burnham, Manchester and No.10 North: How can the PM make his devolution agenda succeed? ๐Ÿ“… Tuesday 8 Sept, 12:30 Join @tompope.bsky.social @lukeraikes.bsky.social @jenwilliamsft.bsky.social @drhannahwhite.bsky.social in Manchester www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/event/andy-b...

Thomas Pope reposted

In practice, I suspect few mayors would try to rebate even if they could. Most see economic potential that could be unlocked through delivering joined-up projects across the economic competencies they have. And regional govs tend to focus more long-term too, which helps with investment 11/12

But it still points towards priorities for making this tier of government more settled and effective: 1. Better understanding of what tiers of govt do, more public engagement. 2. Effective local accountability and scrutiny 3. Clarity on the role of mayors in public services 12/12

Another key weakness in our mayoral system right now is local accountability, and even an understanding by the public of what mayors do. Could there be a high risk, again in the short term, that the public see their mayoral rebate but blame central gov for crumbling infrastructure? 9/12

This doesn't mean mayors shouldn't be able torebate necessarily. But I think they are reasons to be cautious. We think it's right that central govt ties its hands through rules to stop is slashing capital for the sugar rush of short-term current spend or tax breaks. Should mayors too? 10/12

We know that the benefits of econ. development spend and capital in particular are long-term, and so they are quite easy to cut opportunistically. And it might take some time for voters to notice. This is why we have fiscal rules that distinguish current and capital spend 7/12

It is much easier, at least in the short-term, to choose to cut capital without anyone noticing than to cut service provision. So I do think this makes it more plausible for some mayors to gain in the short-term from tax cuts 8/12

Lots of countries allow some variance of tax rates locally (normally both increases and decreases), and on the whole, they are at least as likely to increases taxes to pay for services rather than cut taxes. So is there a reason to worry about allowing that freedom in England? 5/12

One difference between mayors and regional govt in other countries is what they spend money on. Most mayoral spending is on economic development, and lots is capital investment. In other countries, the bulk of spend would be core public services... See e.g. here for GM integrated settlement 6/12

But we should be wary of tax competition - places lowering tax to make their area more attractive. This is inefficient - we want the tax system to be neutral and not distort decisions, including location. Location decisions should be based on fundamentals - people, infrastructure etc. 3/12

So when people say that a benefit of devolution is places competing, I think on tax they're just wrong. Tax competition is a bad thing. That said, the international evidence suggests the theoretical 'race to the bottom' does not tend to happen... 4/12

In general, the argument that mayors should be able to make decisions they think will be best for their citizens - and face accountability at the ballot box - is a strong one. If you are committed to the devolution principle you need strong reasons not to permit this kind of policy 2/12

Thomas Pope reposted

Really great it looks like government is going further on devolving employment support. It's a big opportunity to join-up services, tailor support locally, improve engagement and innovate. Flexible funding will be key to this (and should help areas streamline the current patchwork of programmes)

Stuart Hoddinott@stuarthoddinott.bsky.social

Details on some of the first services they intend to devolve power for, including employment support. A big win for @drbenpaxton.bsky.social and @martha-ford.bsky.social who recommended exactly that in their recent paper on the topic www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publication/...