Transparency International EU

Transparency International EU

@transparency-eu.bsky.social

Fighting corruption in Brussels and beyond. The EU office of @anticorruption.bsky.social. https://transparency.eu/ Subscribe to our newsletter: https://buff.ly/48WMANo Support us and donate: https://buff.ly/4fWpkS6

6.6K followers1.6K following398 posts

According to our data from integritywatch.eu, Philip Morris International (PMI) comes fourth, after Meta, Google and Apple, among the companies that have held the most meetings with MEPs and their assistants. Check out the data on our platform and judge for yourself.

POLITICO Europe@politico.eu

European lawmakers have held four times as many meetings with tobacco and nicotine lobbyists in the past two years compared with the entire previous parliamentary term, according to data analyzed by us.

View full thread

To get there, the students promise real progress on the judiciary, fundamental rights, justice, freedom and security. These areas fall under Chapters 23 and 24, two of the most important and demanding chapters in the EU accession negotiations.

View full thread

For Brussels, the Student List’s win could mark a turning point in Serbia’s long-stalled EU bid. The movement says its commitment to reform comes not from a wish to tick boxes for accession, but from respect for the country’s own constitution.

Its programme includes a new section on “Serbia and Europe”, which pledges to secure Interim Benchmark Assessment Report (IBAR) status, a precondition for provisionally closing accession chapters under the revised enlargement methodology.

Episode 3/4 of breaking down our newly published report: By Invitation Only – Policy Capture and the EU Omnibus I is here! 📄 🧭Who was steering the Omnibus I? This episode looks at Commissioner Dombrovskis (in charge of simplification, including the CSRD and CSDDD) and his cabinet.

We're back with another explainer! This episode sheds light on the European Commission: who lobbies there, who is being lobbied, and what we think should change to improve lobbying transparency in the Commission. Expect plain language and easy-to-understand explanations. Follow for more!🔔

But the lack of action by the Parliament is astonishing. What public (or private) institution allows an employee to continue having budget authority under these conditions? He must be immediately stripped of this authority and face appropriate disciplinary procedures.

There are also fresh allegations that the PfE continued this scheme, for which we submitted a complaint to the EPPO in July. Mr Claeys is an employee of the European Parliament, who allegedly oversaw millions in misspending of taxpayer money which is subject to criminal investigation.

Yet, he remains in charge of the PfE budget while the police raid his offices. We submitted a complaint against him to the EU’s anti-fraud office in April, to establish any administrative misconduct. But the lack of action by the Parliament is astonishing.

This is linked to an investigation by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) for alleged misspending of millions of euros of taxpayer money by these groups.💰 🔎Reportedly, one of the offices raided was Philip Claeys’s, the secretary general of the far-right Patriots for Europe (PfE) group.

⚠️ The risk of this approach? Policy capture: a group of large organisations, unevenly distributed across EU Member States and more often than necessary with roots in the US, gain disproportionate influence during the policymaking process.

The Commission’s revision of its Better Regulation framework could turn this approach into standard practice. We cannot let this go unnoticed. That’s why we dug into the data and wrote an easy-to-digest report, with recommendations on how to turn the tide.

Large corporates and US-linked interests were heavily over-represented, while civil society and small businesses were barely heard. Sharp criticism from various quarters, including the European Ombudsman, did not stop the process, and to this day shaped 11 other Omnibuses.

📄 Our report looks at who was consulted, and who wasn’t, during the Omnibus I process. 📊 The analysis reveals that, despite the European Commission’s Better Regulation Guidelines, closed-door roundtables replaced public stakeholder consultations.

That is why we are launching a mini-series that debunks the myths surrounding EU funding for NGOs. We will explain how and why these organisations are funded, and test the most persistent claims against the facts. 🔍 In this first episode, we look at why the EU funds NGOs in the first place.

Nick walked the students through our work, our three advocacy teams, and gave his candid assessment of the state of lobbying in the EU institutions today: where transparency is improving, and where it still falls short. Thank you to Chris and the students for the invitation and the sharp questions!

Summer is officially over, meaning the lobbyists are back in Brussels. And that's clear when looking at the data. 🌊 📊Swipe to deep dive into last month's Integrity Watch data on lobbying in both the European Parliament and Commission.