TrumpWatch

TrumpWatch

@trumpwatch.skyfleet.blue

Aggregating news, decoding the power. This feed tracks Trump's elected regime through the lens of US media—its narratives, contradictions, and patterns of influence. Watch the spin, follow the moves and get ready to resist. check out @uspol.skyfleet.blue

12.4K followers2.5K following117.2K posts

There are 7 days until the Midterms, 742 days until the next theoretical Presidential Election, and 816 days until the next optional Inauguration Day. Midterms progress: █████████▒ 99% Presidency/Regime progress: ████▒▒▒▒▒▒ 46% Until Next Inauguration : ████▒▒▒▒▒▒ 44% #Resist

impeachtrumpagain.orgIMPEACH TRUMP. AGAIN.Impeach Trump. Sign the petition NOW to defend democracy and demand accountability! He is disqualified from office, and has violated the U.S. Constitution.

Key Senate Democrats set high bar for permitting bill support #Trump

axios.comKey Senate Democrats set high bar for permitting bill supportFour Senate Democrats are pressing Trump officials to begin restoring billions of dollars in clean energy grants before a key vote on the permitting deal. Why it matters: The path for the bipartisan bill in the lame duck session just got steeper. The big picture: Before the first vote, the senators — Tammy Duckworth (Ill.), Ron Wyden (Ore.), Ed Markey (Mass.), and Jeff Merkley (Ore.) — want Trump aides to tell the Energy Department to: Begin reinstating grants terminated in October 2025 that have not already been restored with a clear timeline for completion, and allow recipients to draw on the funds under the original terms. Pledge in writing not to cancel grants based on the political hue of a state or its officials. Driving the news: Their new letter to the bill's authors stops shy of an ultimatum, but says it would be "compelling" if these steps occurred. It shows deep misgivings about the bill, arguing it could provide new tools for Trump to favor fossil fuels. "[T]he promise of BAAJA will only succeed if President Trump takes care that it is faithfully executed. The Trump administration's record gives us no basis to assume that he will," the letter states, calling the bill by its acronym. Catch up quick: The letter recounts the scuttling of Biden-era grants, and White House budget chief Russ Vought listing states that did not vote for President Trump in 2024. The Energy Department has acknowledged , in a court filing , that selections of grants for termination in October 2025 were based on politics. Restoring "unlawfully terminated DOE clean energy awards would be a small but important first step" toward fairness in permitting, it states. Friction point: Co-authors Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) and Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) want to see more federal approvals of stalled renewables projects. They've called some recent administration moves a step in the right direction. But the new letter shows that other lawmakers have separate asks of the administration. Already, some House Democrats have criticized other portions of the bill and called for changes, such as its effects on tribal input into energy projects. State of play: The status of billions of dollars in scuttled or frozen grants — under the 2021 infrastructure and 2022 Inflation Reduction Act — is a moving legal and administrative target. Many are in "limbo," per a report this month from the DOE Alumni Network and Lawyers for Good Government. It also found that most projects DOE retained have received "negligible" funding. The October 2025 cancellations largely targeted blue states, but wider delays and uncertainty have affected places of varying political stripes. Flashback: DOE has said it reviewed grants for financial soundness, economic viability, consistency with administration goals, and other criteria. Sign up here for Axios' Future of Energy newsletter.

Capitol agenda: Democrats face reckoning on trans issues #Trump

politico.comCapitol agenda: Democrats face reckoning on trans issuesA potential Democratic majority on Capitol Hill would face a serious split over whether to use its newfound power to protect transgender Americans. Progressive lawmakers are pushing Democratic leaders to undo President Donald Trump’s attacks on trans people’s health care, participation in athletics and protections against discrimination. But affordability, not culture war fights, has been the overriding theme of Democrats’ push to retake control of Congress. Many centrists fear any pivot away from that pledge would splinter the party, especially with many Democratic candidates openly rejecting some trans rights initiatives during their campaigns. “You have to focus on what people care about,” Rep. Tom Suozzi (D-N.Y.) said in an interview. “Right now that’s affordability, and they want some relief. That’s what we should talk about.” One senior House Democrat serving on House Appropriations, who was granted anonymity to discuss a private conversation, recalled personally asking Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries not to focus on trans issues or other flashpoints if the party wins the House. Nearly a dozen lawmakers and advocates, however, argued for a two-pronged approach to protecting trans people: passing legislation to codify certain rights for trans individuals and using committee gavels to probe the Trump administration’s actions. “We need to have an affirmative platform that protects and expands rights for LGBTQ people,” Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) said in an interview, while the Human Rights Campaign’s Ramiro Sarmiento said Congress “needs to use every tool it has to push back” on Trump. Jeffries did not respond to a request for comment, but other top Democrats are responding to the conflict between affordability and civil rights by asking: Why not both? “If we are telling people that we no longer value equality in this country, it's really hard to build a fair economy,” House Minority Whip Katherine Clark said in an interview. “You can't silo these issues out.” What else we’re watching:  — THE GOP'S SMALL DONOR PROBLEM:  The GOP’s cash advantage over Democrats this cycle has been thanks to a small group of megadonors like Elon Musk. But when it comes to the grassroots donor base, there’s a stark contrast between the parties . Small donations through major online platforms have dipped for Republicans since 2022 while they're up for Democrats by about a third. That’s left vulnerable Republican candidates more reliant on Trump’s campaign war chest and super PACs. — GOP CLIMATE BLOC FACES WIPEOUT: A midterm blue wave could decimate the cohort of Republicans who advocate for addressing climate change and pursuing clean-energy policies. The Conservative Climate Caucus, a House GOP group that pushes for those policies, could lose up to a third of its members in the midterms, with 11 of 66 members in tight races and another 15 retiring. That would shrink the pool of negotiating partners for Democrats as they plan on a renewed push for climate legislation. CORRECTION: A previous version of this report misstated Rep. Tom Suozzi's party affiliation. He is a Democrat.

There are 7 days until the Midterms, 742 days until the next theoretical Presidential Election, and 816 days until the next optional Inauguration Day. Midterms progress: █████████▒ 99% Presidency/Regime progress: ████▒▒▒▒▒▒ 46% Until Next Inauguration : ████▒▒▒▒▒▒ 44% #Resist

impeachtrumpagain.orgIMPEACH TRUMP. AGAIN.Impeach Trump. Sign the petition NOW to defend democracy and demand accountability! He is disqualified from office, and has violated the U.S. Constitution.