Omasiri

Omasiri

@uomasiri.bsky.social

Building ChartSynergy. Practical takes on AI, infra, and tech.

21 followers19 following81 posts

Multi-agent coding gets safer when each role has less authority. The implementer cannot approve. The reviewer cannot edit. QA can file defects but cannot fix code. A merge needs independent review, compliance evidence, CI, and a readback. The human still unblocks agents and checks the work.

Ticket classification kept coming up as a use case for System 1 models, so I tried Laya on 24 historical incidents. Four predictions matched the recorded destination. A small zero-shot experiment, with a result worth unpacking.

My zero-shot Laya pilot and separate historical RAG evaluations used different support tickets and scoring protocols. Putting their accuracy numbers beside each other would look like a model comparison. I haven't run that comparison yet.

Ticket classification kept coming up as a use case for System 1 models, so I tried Laya on 24 historical incidents. Four predictions matched the recorded destination. A small zero-shot experiment, with a result worth unpacking.

On the same 18 support tickets, adding early comment context changed Laya's destination matches from 2/18 to 5/18. Eleven predictions changed. Useful to investigate, but five matches still doesn't make a router I'd put in charge.

Ticket classification kept coming up as a use case for System 1 models, so I tried Laya on 24 historical incidents. Four predictions matched the recorded destination. A small zero-shot experiment, with a result worth unpacking.

In my 24-support-ticket Laya pilot, the model chose a destination instead of human review 21 times. Only 4 of those choices matched the historical destination. I wouldn't use that zero-shot setup for autonomous routing.

Ticket classification kept coming up as a use case for System 1 models, so I tried Laya on 24 historical incidents. Four predictions matched the recorded destination. A small zero-shot experiment, with a result worth unpacking.

Laya is an open-weight alternative to Jev for typed decisions. Instead of generating a paragraph, it can choose a ticket destination in a single forward pass. That made it worth testing. My experiment tested Laya, not Jev.

Opus 5.5 refused to enter credentials in a UI, even in my test/QA environment. That leaves an agent capable of testing the app stuck at the login screen. Protecting production secrets makes sense. Treating test credentials the same way makes legitimate automation less useful. @anthropic.com

A 53-second setup video for Jev tells me more than an architecture diagram: what the first successful path looks like, which command to copy, and where the setup breaks. That’s enough to decide whether the tool deserves a longer look.

Model providers retire versions on their own schedule. What helps when one your feature depends on gets retired: a frozen eval set you can run in one command, an owner for the pin, and a swap you can roll back. https://www.omasiri.com/writing/how-should-you-handle-an-llm-model-deprecation/

Acer says its new Vero 16 laptop opens without tools and has a replaceable battery. Nice. Can someone buying it in 2027 still order that battery in 2031, with a price and an Add to cart button? That would make the repairability pitch easier to trust.

Most teams argue RAG vs fine-tuning before they have the eval set that would settle it. The real split is where the knowledge lives and how fast it changes. A practical way to decide: https://www.omasiri.com/writing/how-to-choose-between-rag-and-fine-tuning/

Most agent budgets start with a model price and stop there. The bill is the loop: retries, tool output, context that grows on every step. I budget per completed task. Here's how to estimate before the invoice: https://www.omasiri.com/writing/what-does-it-cost-to-run-an-ai-agent-in-production/

Microsoft's $329B in future data-center leases is a weirdly useful AI metric. It says a lot of the roadmap has already become buildings and power bills before most customers know which features they will keep.

Microsoft 365 Copilot pricing getting regulator attention is exactly why AI bundling needs boring receipts. If renewal jumps, the screen should say what changed, what AI feature was added, and where the cheaper non-AI plan lives.

Claude, Anthropic's AI chat app, having shared chats show up in search is one of those product words doing too much work. If a button says Share, users hear "send this to a person." If Google can find it, the product shipped a publish button with softer lighting.

Apple reportedly slowing AI smart glasses over camera privacy is the least surprising product call of the week. A wearable camera turns every room into a permissions UI, and nobody wants to debug trust after the indicator light becomes a meme.

Watching 33 Raptor engines light on a Starship booster makes a lot of software launch debates feel very indoors. Hardware teams do not get to argue with the blast radius. The system either survives the ugly minute or it doesn't.

ChatGPT now has Work mode, Codex mode, Ultra mode, Sol/Terra/Luna, and effort levels. I know why every knob exists. I also know most teams will end up making office folklore about which one to use for the monthly report.

I get the PromptQL pitch. Most companies already have a shared brain; it is just scattered across Slack, docs, dashboards, and the person everyone interrupts.

Local-first AI tools are getting more interesting to me than cloud meeting bots. If a tool hears roadmap arguments and customer context, send it all to us is a pretty big product ask.

The Fable 5 game demos are wild. I keep looking at the boring part after the clip: tuning controls, crashy edge cases, and sitting with a player while they say the jump feels bad 40 times. Still a very human way to spend an afternoon.

Microsoft's Majorana 1 chip uses topoconductors to create a new state of matter. They say it's more stable and reliable so, the path to a million qubits is now clearer.

You are up to date.