Valentina Pyatkin

Valentina Pyatkin

@valentinapy.bsky.social

Postdoc in AI at the Allen Institute for AI & the University of Washington. 🌐 https://valentinapy.github.io

5.8K followers585 following77 posts

Valentina Pyatkin reposted

🚨 New Study 🚨 @arxiv.bsky.social has recently decided to prohibit any 'position' paper from being submitted to its CS servers. Why? Because of the "AI slop", and allegedly higher ratios of LLM-generated content in review papers, compared to non-review papers.

Valentina Pyatkin reposted

We're at #NeurIPS2025 with papers, posters, workshops, fireside chats, & talks across the conference. Come learn about our latest research + see live demos!

Valentina Pyatkin reposted

Olmo 3 is notable as a "fully open" LLM - all of the training data is published, plus complete details on how the training process was run. I tried out the 32B thinking model and the 7B instruct models, + thoughts on why transparent training data is so important simonwillison.net/2025/Nov/22/...

simonwillison.netOlmo 3 is a fully open LLMOlmo is the LLM series from Ai2—the Allen institute for AI. Unlike most open weight models these are notable for including the full training data, training process and checkpoints along …

Olmo 3 is out! 🤩 I am particularly excited about Olmo 3 models' precise instruction following abilities and their good generalization performance on IFBench! Lucky to have been a part of the Olmo journey for three iterations already.

Ai2@ai2.bsky.social

Announcing Olmo 3, a leading fully open LM suite built for reasoning, chat, & tool use, and an open model flow—not just the final weights, but the entire training journey. Best fully open 32B reasoning model & best 32B base model. 🧵

Valentina Pyatkin reposted

There’s plenty of evidence for political bias in LLMs, but very few evals reflect realistic LLM use cases — which is where bias actually matters. IssueBench, our attempt to fix this, is accepted at TACL, and I will be at #EMNLP2025 next week to talk about it! New results 🧵

Paul Röttger@paul-rottger.bsky.social

Are LLMs biased when they write about political issues? We just released IssueBench – the largest, most realistic benchmark of its kind – to answer this question more robustly than ever before. Long 🧵with spicy results 👇

Valentina Pyatkin reposted

"Although I hate leafy vegetables, I prefer daxes to blickets." Can you tell if daxes are leafy vegetables? LM's can't seem to! 📷 We investigate if LMs capture these inferences from connectives when they cannot rely on world knowledge. New paper w/ Daniel, Will, @jessyjli.bsky.social

Valentina Pyatkin reposted

Hi #COLM2025! 🇨🇦 I will be presenting a talk on the importance of community-driven LLM evaluations based on an opinion abstract I wrote with Jo Kavishe, @victorojewale.bsky.social and @geomblog.bsky.social tomorrow at 9:30am in 524b for solar-colm.github.io Hope to see you there!

solar-colm.github.ioThird Workshop on Socially Responsible Language Modelling Research (SoLaR) 2025COLM 2025 in-person Workshop, October 10th at the Palais des Congrès in Montreal, Canada

Now accepted to #neurips25 datasets & benchmarks! See you in San Diego! 🥳

Valentina Pyatkin@valentinapy.bsky.social

💡Beyond math/code, instruction following with verifiable constraints is suitable to be learned with RLVR. But the set of constraints and verifier functions is limited and most models overfit on IFEval. We introduce IFBench to measure model generalization to unseen constraints.

Valentina Pyatkin reposted

With fresh support of $75M from NSF and $77M from NVIDIA, we’re set to scale our open model ecosystem, bolster the infrastructure behind it, and fast‑track reproducible AI research to unlock the next wave of scientific discovery. 💡

🔈For the SoLaR workshop @COLM_conf we are soliciting opinion abstracts to encourage new perspectives and opinions on responsible language modeling, 1-2 of which will be selected to be presented at the workshop. Please use the google form below to submit your opinion abstract ⬇️

Valentina Pyatkin reposted

I'll be at #ACL2025🇦🇹!! Would love to chat about all things pragmatics 🧠, redefining "helpfulness"🤔 and enabling better cross-cultural capabilities 🗺️ 🫶 Presenting our work on culturally offensive nonverbal gestures 👇 🕛Wed @ Poster Session 4 📍Hall 4/5, 11:00-12:30

Akhila Yerukola@akhilayerukola.bsky.social

Did you know? Gestures used to express universal concepts—like wishing for luck—vary DRAMATICALLY across cultures? 🤞means luck in US but deeply offensive in Vietnam 🚨 📣 We introduce MC-SIGNS, a test bed to evaluate how LLMs/VLMs/T2I handle such nonverbal behavior! 📜: arxiv.org/abs/2502.17710

Valentina Pyatkin reposted

This week is #ICML in Vancouver, and a number of our researchers are participating. Here's the full list of Ai2's conference engagements—we look forward to connecting with fellow attendees. 👋

I'll be at ICML in Vancouver next week! #ICML2025 You can find me at the following: - giving an invited talk at the "Models of Human Feedback for AI Alignment" workshop - giving an invited talk at the "AI for Math" workshop I'll also present these two papers ⤵️

💡Beyond math/code, instruction following with verifiable constraints is suitable to be learned with RLVR. But the set of constraints and verifier functions is limited and most models overfit on IFEval. We introduce IFBench to measure model generalization to unseen constraints.

View full thread

💡Beyond math/code, instruction following with verifiable constraints is suitable to be learned with RLVR. But the set of constraints and verifier functions is limited and most models overfit on IFEval. We introduce IFBench to measure model generalization to unseen constraints.

Additionally, we wrote new training constraints and verifier functions and suggest a good recipe for IF-RLVR training for improved generalization. We find that IF-RLVR generalization works best on base models and when you train on multiple constraints per instruction!

Valentina Pyatkin reposted

This new benchmark created by @valentinapy.bsky.social should be the new default replacing IFEval. Some of the best frontier models get <50% and it comes with separate training prompts so people don’t effectively train on test. Wild gap from o3 > Gemini 2.5 pro of like 30 points.

Ai2@ai2.bsky.social

Introducing IFBench, a benchmark to measure how well AI models follow new, challenging, and diverse verifiable instructions. Top models like Gemini 2.5 Pro or Claude 4 Sonnet are only able to score up to 50%, presenting an open frontier for post-training. 🧵

Valentina Pyatkin reposted

Introducing IFBench, a benchmark to measure how well AI models follow new, challenging, and diverse verifiable instructions. Top models like Gemini 2.5 Pro or Claude 4 Sonnet are only able to score up to 50%, presenting an open frontier for post-training. 🧵

Valentina Pyatkin reposted

Check out our take on Chain-of-Thought. I really like this paper as a survey on the current literature on what CoT is, but more importantly on what it's not. It also serves as a cautionary tale to the (apparently quite common) misuse of CoT as an interpretable method.

Fazl Barez@fbarez.bsky.social

Excited to share our paper: "Chain-of-Thought Is Not Explainability"! We unpack a critical misconception in AI: models explaining their steps (CoT) aren't necessarily revealing their true reasoning. Spoiler: the transparency can be an illusion. (1/9) 🧵

Valentina Pyatkin reposted

🚨Submission deadline extended to June 27th AoE!🚨 Our reviewer interest form is also open! See below for more details👇

Valentina Pyatkin@valentinapy.bsky.social

Interested in shaping the progress of responsible AI and meeting leading researchers in the field? SoLaR@COLM 2025 is looking for paper submissions and reviewers! 🤖 ML track: algorithms, math, computation 📚 Socio-technical track: policy, ethics, human participant research

Interested in shaping the progress of responsible AI and meeting leading researchers in the field? SoLaR@COLM 2025 is looking for paper submissions and reviewers! 🤖 ML track: algorithms, math, computation 📚 Socio-technical track: policy, ethics, human participant research

Valentina Pyatkin reposted

i created a gist with some non default llm courses gist.github.com/yoavg/95bbc5...

gist.github.comllm-materials-2025.mdGitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
Yoav Goldberg@yoavgo.bsky.social

i am looking for academic (or similarly "serious") courses or textbook-y texts on LLMs with a major component (lets say >66%) that is NOT about the technicalities of Transformers, optimization, RL, tokenization, etc, but instead focus more on data, eval, interpretability, etc. pointers?

Valentina Pyatkin reposted

I’m thrilled to share RewardBench 2 📊— We created a new multi-domain reward model evaluation that is substantially harder than RewardBench, we trained and released 70 reward models, and we gained insights about reward modeling benchmarks and downstream performance!

Valentina Pyatkin reposted

RewardBench 2 is here! We took a long time to learn from our first reward model evaluation tool to make one that is substantially harder and more correlated with both downstream RLHF and inference-time scaling.