Lucia Walinchus

Lucia Walinchus

@walinchus.bsky.social

Managing Data Editor, NBC owned stations. Public records attorney, journalist, ice hockey player/coach. Former bylines: NY Times , Washington Post, Eye on Ohio, etc. Hearts= likes OR bookmarks

5.6K followers802 following1.6K posts

These political ads are relentless. Never thought I would long for the day when I could just be annoyed by car insurance and desperate pleas to talk to your doctor about superfluous pharmaceuticals.

This is exactly how we got the notion that you shouldn’t put a preposition at the end of a sentence. The next time someone suggests as much show them where this is at. 

This post is unavailable.

🧵This is a great series. Nominally about England's Medieval queens but keep in mind this is a time when when contemporary chroniclers often left women out, even if they had considerable political influence. So I would call it, a more inclusive history. A few highlights: #histbookchat #booksky💙📚

View full thread

🧵This is a great series. Nominally about England's Medieval queens but keep in mind this is a time when when contemporary chroniclers often left women out, even if they had considerable political influence. So I would call it, a more inclusive history. A few highlights: #histbookchat #booksky💙📚

View full thread

🧵This is a great series. Nominally about England's Medieval queens but keep in mind this is a time when when contemporary chroniclers often left women out, even if they had considerable political influence. So I would call it, a more inclusive history. A few highlights: #histbookchat #booksky💙📚

View full thread

Queens had their own lands and taxes for income, and often acted as regents for husbands and spouses away at war. Many had influence at court. A few successfully invaded England by themselves. To read a history that downplays their role is to read a history with a big chunk missing.

🧵This is a great series. Nominally about England's Medieval queens but keep in mind this is a time when when contemporary chroniclers often left women out, even if they had considerable political influence. So I would call it, a more inclusive history. A few highlights: #histbookchat #booksky💙📚

Freshman boy talking to my daughter: I want to be a misogynist. Daughter: Uh… WHAT?! Boy: a misogynist. You know, someone who gives other people massages.

Apropos of nothing, I thought you might want to read this previous investigation I did that took over a year. For legal reasons, we could only use documented complaints of rape and SA. I stitched together >60 gigabytes worth of records from 16 different agencies. Conviction rates were about 3-4%.

Lucia Walinchus@walinchus.bsky.social

1/6 #BehindTheStory: Boston Officials said the very existence of all violent sex crimes was a secret. We appealed under MA's public records law. Read this story, which was only possible as a result! #FOIA #PublicRecords www.nbcnews.com/specials/sex...

View full thread

And all my usual caveats. Funny aside- Me, reading the dedication: Oh wow her dad's last name is Law! I thought- she writes about law... and is a lawyer... that must be a pseudonym. My kid: Seriously?! Your initials are LAW & you're a lawyer! Me: yeah I guess it's the subliminal advertising. 😂

View full thread

This is not to say that those prejudices didn't persist. For example, the federal government would go on to restrict immigration in the 1920s using some very explicitly racist language. But it is fascinating to read about how birth of anthropology challenged many hardwired assumptions.

View full thread

And this story goes into the chart above in more depth. bsky.app/profile/wali...

Lucia Walinchus@walinchus.bsky.social

You will want to check out this @shelbybremer.bsky.social @nbcsandiego.com story: we waited 5 months for the release of this data! Thank you to the @deportationdata.bsky.social who obtained the #FOIA. www.nbcsandiego.com/video/videos...

View full thread
View full thread

Racism is sometimes called the "original sin" of America and I think that's an apt metaphor here: when faced with the cognitive dissonance between the above and slaveholding, some founding fathers decided that this was actually rational if one group was subhuman.

"Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship" takes a deep dive into what "liberty" actually means in terms of the ability to stay or go & argues that at many points throughout history, the government offered incentives to some while restricting the movement of others based on race or origin.

View full thread

Major changes in judicial precedent, state pressure to exclude certain immigrants, and the desire to use federal power against Native American tribes changed all this in the late 1800s. But why is it important to understand something that happened in the Arthur administration?

This goes to the question: Who is an American? On paper, it is "we the people" who "hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

A standard history textbook says immigration policy started in the late 1800s. It is, after all, federal law, and that's when the first major federal immigration laws passed. But the author argues that actually in antebellum America states controlled immigration and didn't want federal inference.

Just bought a ticket to #SPJ26 and excited to see some great speakers! Looks like they will have @nicolekraft.bsky.social @franklomonte.bsky.social @jackshuler.bsky.social @bethanybruner.dispatch.com @annastaver.bsky.social @ameliarobinson.bsky.social and a few more not on bluesky.

🗓️ #SPJ26 is just around the corner! The countdown is on — now’s the time to register for SPJ’s biggest gathering of the year and make your plans to join us in Columbus. ➡️ Register, explore the current lineup and reserve your discounted hotel room today: spj26.org

View full thread

11/ Very cool I did not know what Uhuru meant. Though DS9 is my favorite of the Trek series as it’s a little grittier. It still incorporates the wonder of exploration but not to the point of naïveté. Wow ironically TV execs almost dropped the ball until saved by Ball!

View full thread
View full thread

7/12 Ooh I love Emmy Noether! Check out this book (and my review of it a few days ago) to learn more about this. I actually read both of these somewhat simultaneously and I felt like they helped me understand each other.

8/12 I was thinking this the whole time and it’s casually mentioned in just a line. If a black hole a centimeter across has as much matter as the Earth, & they are very hard to see, & we can’t see inside them, isn’t that a more logical explanation for dark matter than invisible particles?

View full thread

5/12 Lastly, I love the attitude that science is about questions and not answers. Physics isn’t just a regurgitation of facts. It’s a complex field that we are now just scratching the surface of understanding.

6/12 Though there are a few things that the book could have been explained better. For example, there’s a very detailed explanation about particle spin. But then they actually don’t spin? What?

View full thread

2/12 Three things I really liked about this book. First, I have read many science books where are the author’s attitude is like: some people waste their time indulging in fiction about this subject, but I am actually furthering the knowledge of humanity! But Prescod-Weinstein has as much respect

View full thread

5/ Noether’s personal life was as tragic as she was brilliant. She taught for decades without pay even after contributing vital research. She was forced to flee her home as Nazi forces purged Jewish academics.

6/ And all my usual caveats. In the acknowledgments, the author thanks everyone who has contributed to open source projects, which I thought was neat. I should do that more, too!

View full thread

3/6 I thought this book had one of the best explanations of general relativity I have come across. If you draw a line on a map, it looks like a straight line, but actually it is ever so slightly curved. The difference is imperceptible over short distances. But the bigger the distance, the bigger…

4/6 the problem. This is a simplification but basically: Newtonian physics works over short spans. But space-time is curved and you have to account for that over astronomical distances. This is not in the book, but it reminded me of Iowa’s attempt to have perfectly square counties. So close.

2/ @astrokatie.com: “Noether’s theorem is to theoretical physics what natural selection is to biology.” Her work paved the way for things as varied as quantum computing and the calculation of planetary orbits. She personally helped Einstein with the trickier bits of the math he needed.