Post

I don’t think there’s a single serious critic who says AI’s not useful? The concerns I see are about content rights, worker impacts, environmental effects, epistemological threats, or media manipulation. But that’s all predicated on the idea that it *does* work, often too well for people to manage…

Kevin Roose@kevinroose.com

The NYT Magazine asked me and @caseynewton.bsky.social to open their AI issue by talking about how we use AI, why it's not going away, and how you can't be a serious critic if you're in denial about how useful it is. Bluesky's gonna love this one! www.nytimes.com/2025/06/16/m...

AI is only “useful” if you ignore that a huge part of the usefulness of creative work is DOING the work, not the end product. If I’m writing a spec for a new software feature, sitting and thinking and being stuck and frustrated and organizing my thoughts is a large portion of the point.

I’m not arguing that that’s not valuable? I’m saying there are, for example, working coders who find utility in having systems assist them in writing their code. Are you saying they don’t?

0 reposts1 like

No replies yet.