Post

I don’t think there’s a single serious critic who says AI’s not useful? The concerns I see are about content rights, worker impacts, environmental effects, epistemological threats, or media manipulation. But that’s all predicated on the idea that it *does* work, often too well for people to manage…

Kevin Roose@kevinroose.com

The NYT Magazine asked me and @caseynewton.bsky.social to open their AI issue by talking about how we use AI, why it's not going away, and how you can't be a serious critic if you're in denial about how useful it is. Bluesky's gonna love this one! www.nytimes.com/2025/06/16/m...

If I have a lawnmower that works really well to mow grass but requires the life of someone else to run it, is it useful? No, because I have a moral obligation to avoid using it. (And LLMs are nowhere near as reliable as a lawnmower.)

You would think, but billions of people have decided that the photo sharing app that runs on genocide is useful. I’m just responding to reality.

0 reposts1 like

If moral vacuity is a necessary part of finding something useful, it doesn't make you more of a realist to credit that utility with the costs separated out. Someone has to pay up, even if it's not whoever entered the prompt. Don't help them duck responsibility.