Post

The dialogue around LLMs is kind of broken both in terms of critique and advocacy. For critique, we need to focus on how we attack fascist tech power consistently — LLMs are only one part of that; merely saying "AI bad" has simply ended up with a lot of people using AI quietly while feeling shame...

Ben Collins@bencollins.bsky.social

People can’t just say this for literally years now and have the products it creates only positively affect spreadsheet people. Most people have profoundly negative experiences with this product because its utility remains pretty niche but targeted to the capital class.

People who use it should feel shame. I include myself in that. It's a feeling one should embrace so that it is only used when strictly beneficial and to not trust the results.

I don't feel any shame about using a model I trained on my own writing that runs on my own machine, and it's insane to suggest that I should.

0 reposts7 likes

More to the point, the shame about the use of the big tech platforms isn't _useful_. Everybody has an instagram account and feels bad about it while Zuck profits off of them. What the fuck good does that do anybody? All those Substack writers are ashamed but still on there. It means nothing.

no? i deleted my meta accounts ages ago bc i didn't want to support that company anymore—just bc you dont want to inconvenience yourself and stand by your morals doesnt mean everyone is like that

I have argued many times that people have to stop making the “convenient” choices; it’s good that you’re doing so. The vast majority of folks arguing for wanting to just feel smug about others feeling ashamed are not doing the same. And (as you know) it’s not just an individual action thing…

People need to be thinking about structural change to systems. You won’t engage those folks in enabling that structural change if they’re being shamed. You have to offer them affirmative alternatives.