Post

I've been thinking a lot about what the most-logical next cities would be for congestion-relief pricing and I really think Chicago and Boston are the best options. Both have good metro and regional rail networks, clearly defined CBDs, and logical geographic boundaries.

Taras Grescoe 🚇@taras-grescoe.com

Congestion-relief pricing has been a big success in #NYC. Car traffic is down, transit ridership is up. Another city that could benefit? #Chicago. With its compact core, transit efficiency would jump if cars were limited. chi.streetsblog.org/2025/02/12/n...

For Chicago, I think the logical boundaries would be Roosevelt Road to the south and all of the river crossings to the West and North. I'd keep Lake Shore Drive untolled but if you turn off it anywhere between Roosevelt and the River, you're tolled (akin to the West Side Hwy in NYC).

Boston is a bit trickier on the southwest side. I'd like to see Back Bay included in the zone, but including the South End is probably not necessary. So there are three options that I see. Dark blue as the most expansive, teal to include Back Bay, and pink as perhaps as phase 1 with room to grow.

Center City Philly is another good option (perhaps between Spring Garden and South Streets) but I worry that the regional rail component of SEPTA's operations isn't robust enough currently to be viable at present (classic chicken-egg problem).

0 reposts0 likes

No replies yet.