Post

NEW: Anti-voting lawyer Cleta Mitchell and election denier Tina Peters are both pushing a scheme to have Trump's commerce secretary regulate voting machines as part of a broader effort to interfere in the midterms. But legal experts say their scheme is way off base and blatantly unconstitutional.

democracydocket.comElection deniers Cleta Mitchell and Tina Peters want Trump’s commerce secretary to regulate voting machinesThe problem? No federal official can seize control of election administration from the states and counties, who hold the power run elections under the U.S. Constitution.

167 reposts288 likes

It will be extraordinarily disillusioning and disappointing if these anti-democratic miscreants, and untold number of other election interference scumbags, aren’t prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law when all is said and done.

In 2018, China fast tacked voting machine trademarks to Ivanka. In 2025: ‘The company was purchased by Scott Leiendecker, a former Republican Missouri election official who founded KnowInk, which makes electronic pollbooks used at voting sites across the country’ www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...

theguardian.comDominion, voting firm targeted by false 2020 election claims, sold to new ownerCompany, which reached $787.5m defamation settlement with Fox News, becomes new entity called Liberty Vote

This is just great. Peters prison term was commuted by Democratic Governor Polis which resulted in her release from prison and Mitchell was recommended by a grand jury to be referred for an indictment in a scheme to overturn the 2020 election and somehow escaped accountability.

Not against the LAW? 🙄 What are WE going to do about it? We are currently a lawless dictatorship. Stop describing obvious things, and give us a plan to fight it!