Post

The dialogue around LLMs is kind of broken both in terms of critique and advocacy. For critique, we need to focus on how we attack fascist tech power consistently β€” LLMs are only one part of that; merely saying "AI bad" has simply ended up with a lot of people using AI quietly while feeling shame...

Ben Collins@bencollins.bsky.social

People can’t just say this for literally years now and have the products it creates only positively affect spreadsheet people. Most people have profoundly negative experiences with this product because its utility remains pretty niche but targeted to the capital class.

And amongst AI advocates, there's too often the same tedious fallback to arguments of inevitability and "progress", which excuse the enabling of the bad actors in tech, and advance their authoritarian project. It's a failure of imagination, in addition to being complicit in their political goals...

I think the "inevitability" frame, coming hot on the heals of the "we stole all your art and you can't stop us, peasants" opening bid, is about 50% of why everyone hates it now. I think it's intended in a larger "progress marches on" sense, but...

0 reposts2 likes

... I think virtually always the way it's *received* is that this specific techn is going to be shoved at us and the person saying it's "inevitable" is making a personally targeted threat. I think most don't intend to be threatening but it's really received that way. Very "lie back and enjoy it"