Post

California bill AB 2047 mandates 3D printers analyze each print. These scans are only feasible through cloud-connected AI scans, a surveillance apparatus that’s prone to misuse and will chill lawful speech. Creators deserve better. www.eff.org/3DPrintCA

eff.salsalabs.orgReject California’s Attack on 3D PrintersCalifornia lawmakers are advancing A.B. 2047 in the State Assembly within the next few weeks. The impact is surveillance, manufacturer lock-in, and censorship for all creators and in the state.

91 reposts245 likes

Except that their solution won't actually solve that at all, and will just be a huge, expensive violation of privacy. Also, there... isn't a solution. It's not like the law proposes a *method*, it just says "Identify gun parts from print files". This is not possible, even by "cloud based AI".

It depends entirely upon what is being printed. There are parts one wouldn't want 3D printed in the first place. And then there are parts which are obviously gun parts, like a lower receiver. The law is still unenforceable and useless.

The problem is that the law's proposed "scan" is impossible, but the law *is* very enforceable, at least against printer manufacturers. No scan software, get sued. To express what I mean by impossible - the proposed scan runs on gcode. This is gcode. What is this a part of? Is it a gun part?:

No, it was originally _intended_ to be about 3D printing gun parts. That's not the law they wrote, though. The law they wrote applies to ALL 3D printing, not just gun part 3D printing. I sympathize if you think they *meant well*, but they clearly screwed it up horribly, and need to start over.

I don't think they mean well at all. I think it's political. I think well meaning people enact the least restrictive means possible to secure the public safety. Well meaning persons do not preemptively punish the general public or chop down the entire tree because of a few bad apples.

NY recently passed a very similar law despite the law's own proponents expressing concerns that it isn't actually feasible. Other states are trying more feasible but still insane steps like gun background checks for all 3d printer purchases.

I imagine most printer manufacturers will simply drop California if this passes. There is no way that 90% of the printer companies will be able to afford to make this impossible, make-believe "gun-detection" software (for gcode!!). It's not like California is providing it, just demanding it.

Furthermore, all of the software needed to operate a 3D printer is open-source. It is straightforward to build your own printer from parts. How will this bill impact that? Is the state of CA going to tell me that I can't build a printer because they think I might be a gun-printing criminal?

Again, I can do nearly nothing because I don't live in CA. I tried raising my own reps about this subject, but only got auto responses about protecting 2nd amendment rights. This may wind up a dead letter law due to the unfeasibility of this, but that's cold comfort when I can only sit and watch.

How on earth does trying to stop 3D printed guns trample your rights? On what planet should the 2nd amendment written by people who never imagined a car or dishwasher, much less semi-automatic weapons cover something like this? There's plenty of ways to get guns in America. Let's stop this one.

By all means, we should reduce the number of guns in this country. What I was trying to get at is that laws like this can open the doors to undue censorship and block otherwise lawful making and file sharing beyond firearms, all passed under the guise of gun control. www.eff.org/deeplinks/20...

eff.orgDon’t Repeat NY’s 3D Printing BlunderThis year the state of New York had the dubious honor of being the first to pass a controversial provision to mandate all 3D printers come with surveillance and censorship. That means not only is ther...