Post

For region, a reminder that it's the World Wide Web, not the wealthy Western web. This breakdown is a complicated mix of factors—too large for Bluesky. Here, we should not forget at the end of the day that it's people who use this technology regardless of location. webaim.org/projects/scr...

0 reposts2 likes

Sorry, I am curious if you are saying that the survey data itself is focused largely on the wealthy western web? It definitely seems to be

Yes, but also consider the language the survey is in, the language of the channels it is promoted in, the primary language of the communities it is shared in, etc.

yeah ok, I was just checking that I understood the same way and wasn't missing your point :). I have asked a few times I think if we know who runs this and had questions for them. I'm not sure if I ever did find out...

For self-reported disability, I hope the data of the 5.2% of not identifying was discarded. I view this survey as collecting information from daily users, information from people who don't rely on the technology could unnecessarily skew the results. webaim.org/projects/scr...

Disability is a word with multiple meanings. It has a legal meaning, a medical meaning, and a personal meaning. I think without getting more information from survey respondents it would be difficult to know what the 5.2% include. Hard to exclude an ambiguous value, they're still screen reader users.

My personal favourite “other” was a person who persistently heard intrusive voices. She liked to listen to pages while also reading them visually because the sound helped to drown out the voices.

Self-reported proficiency is always a fun one. Setting selection bias aside for the moment: It's a good reminder that just because something can technically be accessed and operated via some obscure command that it doesn't necessarily mean someone knows about said command. webaim.org/projects/scr...