The 11th edition of the @webaim.bsky.social Screen Reader User Survey is now live! This is a vital resource into better understanding how people who use screen readers actually operate your website or app. webaim.org/projects/scr... My commentary on it as a thread 🧵 #a11y
Post
For region, a reminder that it's the World Wide Web, not the wealthy Western web. This breakdown is a complicated mix of factors—too large for Bluesky. Here, we should not forget at the end of the day that it's people who use this technology regardless of location. webaim.org/projects/scr...
0 reposts2 likes
For self-reported disability, I hope the data of the 5.2% of not identifying was discarded. I view this survey as collecting information from daily users, information from people who don't rely on the technology could unnecessarily skew the results. webaim.org/projects/scr...
Disability is a word with multiple meanings. It has a legal meaning, a medical meaning, and a personal meaning. I think without getting more information from survey respondents it would be difficult to know what the 5.2% include. Hard to exclude an ambiguous value, they're still screen reader users.
I'm glad they capture disability types. It's a great reminder that screen reader use is not exclusively for fully blind individuals, and also not exclusively for vision-related disabilities. I wish more people knew this. webaim.org/projects/scr...
Self-reported proficiency is always a fun one. Setting selection bias aside for the moment: It's a good reminder that just because something can technically be accessed and operated via some obscure command that it doesn't necessarily mean someone knows about said command. webaim.org/projects/scr...
Same general thoughts for internet proficiency. People who are more online probably have a better chance of being aware of, and filling out this survey. webaim.org/projects/scr...