Post

this is absolutely perfectly said

Online mutual aid dares to ask “what if charity was distributed according to the recipients’ ability to accumulate clout and perform abjection on English language social media?”

The reason you want an actual humanitarian aid system and *don’t* want to force everybody to rely on online mutual aid is because online mutual aid *forces people experiencing horrific trauma* to perform on the Internet for survival.

Which is not to say that online mutual aid is therefore always bad or that it’s bad to participate in it, but we have to be very honest about how it creates a pretty brutal competition.

What I am really trying to say here is "this is exactly why USAID and the international aid system it once supported, which is now close to collapsing due to its destruction, was Good Actually"

This is also why I really don't care for how an increasing number of people on both the left and the right (and in between) now claim that mutual aid is *better* than existing aid organizations, and therefore we don't really need to prioritize saving them.

The one time I saw Dean Spade speak in person, in a presentation that was promoted as "what is mutual aid & how we can do it", I was sincerely curious to hear how he would boil it down, and then... it was nothing. Literally 100% of the talk was "why charity nonprofits are bad"... (1/2)

0 reposts6 likes

...and 0.5% was "how we do better" (other than don't do nonprofits). It was very frustrating, and I do *not* think this was really all that Spade had to offer on the subject, but it was what he chose to focus on so completely that it made the talk nearly useless. (2/2)