Post

OK @explaintrade.com did it.. the best gloss on it is that the UK-Australia FT is much better for UK beef consumers than the EU one is...

Dmitry Grozoubinski@explaintrade.com

Wondering what leverage in negotiations looks like? Australia's new FTA with the EU provides 16,830 tonnes of tariff free access for beef. Australia's FTA with the UK, completed with a desperate Johnson administration, provided 35,000 tonnes tariff free, rising to unlimited over 15 years.

Yeah. There are two separate things here: a) A policy argument about the wisdom of agricultural protectionism; and b) A negotiation observation about the fact that it was/is policy, and Australia was able to push the UK much further off it than it has been the EU.

5 reposts35 likes

I agree.. if the UK position was based on a robust pro-consumer view then would be defensible (as opposed to EU producer driven perspective). As an outcome of rubbish negotiating tactics with a timetable dictated by a photo op rather less so.

If you're concerned about consumers then unilaterally cut the MFN rate and get the cheapest/best beef in from anywhere. UK exporters have little to gain from Oz market access anyway.

This is of course the easiest Brexit trade benefit and one they should have done more. You don't even need to change the MFN schedule ffs, just cut the applied rate! It's not rocket engineering.

They tried! Remember the week we spent with "No Deal Tariffs" before the inglorious retreat? They discovered that actually many of those tariffs are strongly lobbied for by influential groups

Even worse a timetable dictated by a photo op when you claim that you're going to be tough leading to a collapse in credibility with other partners when you try the same thing